Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
Cohu makes the equipment and consumables semiconductor manufacturers use at the last step before a chip ships: testing that it works and inspecting that it was built correctly. Its AI connection runs through two products — the Eclipse thermal handler, which holds high-power AI processors at precise temperatures during final test, and the Neon inspection platform for HBM memory. Both sit at the back end of the manufacturing chain — the stage where advanced packaging is the fastest-growing part of the semiconductor equipment market and back-end integration is increasingly the defining constraint.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $522M |
| Revenue Growth | +32.6% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | 2.5% |
| Net Cash | $171M |
| Earnings Beats | 3 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- HPC revenue guidance has been raised twice in two quarters — from $60M-$85M to $80M-$100M to $100M-$110M — and management says the entire increase is on the Eclipse side.
- The HPC opportunity pipeline grew from ~$750M to ~$850M of annual customer spend, with $190M qualified across four customers and $250M in active qualification across five.
- Profitability inflected in a single quarter: non-GAAP income went from $0.6M in Q1 FY2026 to $14.1M in Q2 FY2026, and the GAAP loss narrowed from $12.1M to $0.2M.
- The core business is recovering alongside HPC — test utilization rose from 78% to 80% and industrial orders grew 87% year over year in Q2 FY2026.
- Recurring revenue — interface products, spares, thermal heads and software — was about 53% of Q2 revenue, and the balance sheet holds $498M of cash and short-term investments against $326.9M of total debt.
What We’re Watching
- Gross margin has stepped down as systems mix rises: 45.4% in Q2 FY2026, guided to ~45% in Q3, with higher-margin recurring revenue falling from ~60% to ~53% of the mix.
- Memory cost inflation is unresolved — management says memory is leading higher costs and longer lead times and that pass-through conversations with customers have 'just started.'
- Automotive orders fell 24% year over year in Q2 and management does not expect recovery until late Q1 or Q2 2027.
- Q4 FY2026 is guided roughly flat to Q3, with management saying it is 'maxed out' on the HPC side and expects the core business to stay flattish.
Cohu's thesis is strengthening on demand, but unevenly. Revenue growth guidance was raised from 20-25% to about 35%, HPC guidance was raised twice, a single $26M Eclipse order landed in early Q3, and non-GAAP profitability swung from $0.6M to $14.1M in one quarter. Against that, gross margin is drifting down with mix, automotive orders are falling rather than recovering, and Q4 is guided flat on capacity ceilings. The open question is whether the AI ramp lifts gross margin as Eclipse ramp costs roll off and the recurring tail arrives, or whether mix keeps pulling it down while the core cycle stalls.
Earnings
Cohu reported Q2 FY2026 revenue of $149M, up 38% year over year and above the midpoint of its $144M ±$7M guide. Gross margin was 45.4%, above guidance on favorable product mix but below the prior quarter. The GAAP loss narrowed to $0.2M from $12.1M in Q1 FY2026, and non-GAAP income was $14.1M. Computing was 46% of system orders, up 150% year over year, driven by Eclipse growth in high-performance computing.
| Metric | Q2 FY2026 | Q1 FY2026 | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $149M | $125M | $108M | +38.3% |
| Gross margin | 45.4% | 40.4% | 34.4% | +1100bps |
| EBITDA | $10M | $1M | −$2M | −554.5% |
| EPS | $-0.00 | $-0.26 | $-0.36 | −98.8% |
| Test utilization (end of quarter) | 80% | 78% | n/a | — |
| Recurring revenue share | ~53% | ~60% | n/a | — |
sales of $149 million up 38% year over year— Luis A. Müller, CEO, 2026-07-30
Management tone: The Q2 FY2026 call reads as more confident than Q1. Language moved from a range — growth of 20% to 25% — to a concrete figure of approximately 35%, the HPC outlook was raised for a second consecutive quarter, and the pipeline was re-segmented with customer counts and dollar buckets. Management was direct on the pipeline breakdown, qualification timing, capacity, competition and lead times, but declined to name customers, deflected on memory cost pass-through and CPU/GPU mix, and declined to quantify co-packaged optics revenue for 2027–2028. The framing also shifted from selling an opportunity to describing the difficulty of delivering it.
Management Guidance
For Q3 FY2026, management guided revenue to ~$170M ±$7M, up 14% sequentially and 35% year over year, with gross margin of ~45% and operating expenses of ~$54M. Full-year revenue growth is guided to ~35%, implying about $610M-$615M, with Q4 expected roughly flat to Q3 and full-year gross margin in the mid-40% range. Management also guided Q3 net interest income of ~$1.6M, a tax provision of ~$5.2M, and ~55M diluted shares including 5.8M convertible shares. Management said roughly 40% of sequential revenue growth should convert to operating profit, that the Q3 sequential step-up splits about 50% HPC and 50% core at roughly $10M each, and that capex is targeted at ~2% of revenue.
Trajectory
Revenue has climbed from a cyclical trough — $95.3M in Q3 FY2024 and $96.8M in Q1 FY2025 — to $149M in Q2 FY2026, up 38% year over year and 19.1% sequentially. Gross margin recovered from 33.5% in Q1 FY2025 to 45.4% in Q2 FY2026, though it edged down from the prior quarter as higher-margin recurring revenue fell from ~60% to ~53% of the mix. EBITDA has swung from negative through most of FY2024 and FY2025 to positive in Q1 and Q2 FY2026 ($0.7M and $10.0M). Management guides Q4 roughly flat to Q3, citing capacity ceilings on both the HPC and core sides.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $614M and EBITDA of $50M, an 8.1% margin, then FY+2 revenue of $800M and EBITDA of $118M, a 14.7% margin. The near-term anchor is the guided FY2026 ramp: the Q3 guide of ~$170M, the $100M-$110M HPC revenue target, and the Malaysia handler capacity build. FY+2 depends on converting the pipeline's $250M active-qualification and ~$445M early-engagement buckets into orders, and on the operating leverage management describes — roughly 40% of sequential revenue growth converting to operating profit.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $453M | $614M | $800M |
| YoY Growth | — | +35.6% | +30.3% |
| EBITDA | −$7M | $50M | $118M |
| EBITDA Margin | -1.5% | 8.1% | 14.7% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 17.0% above analyst consensus.
For Q3 FY2026, management guided revenue to ~$170M ±$7M, up 14% sequentially and 35% year over year, with gross margin of ~45% and operating expenses of ~$54M. Full-year revenue growth is guided to ~35%, implying about $610M-$615M, with Q4 expected roughly flat to Q3 and full-year gross margin in the mid-40% range. Management also guided Q3 net interest income of ~$1.6M, a tax provision of ~$5.2M, and ~55M diluted shares including 5.8M convertible shares. Management said roughly 40% of sequential revenue growth should convert to operating profit, that the Q3 sequential step-up splits about 50% HPC and 50% core at roughly $10M each, and that capex is targeted at ~2% of revenue.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- HPC revenue reaches the $200M-$250M that the Malaysia expansion is being sized for by early 2027 — roughly double the FY2026 target.
- The $190M qualified pipeline converts to orders and the ~$250M active-qualification bucket moves to qualified across one or two more customers.
- Gross margin holds near 45% as Eclipse ramp costs roll off in 2027 and the recurring tail from 2026 system shipments arrives about a year after shipment.
- Automotive orders inflect, broadening a core recovery that is currently led by industrial.
- Software scales off its first $1M quarter as the largest single-customer deployment expands in the second half of 2026.
- Test utilization rolls back below the 80% level management calls the turning point for core IDM capex.
- The Malaysia capacity build slips — management names the supply chain as the binding constraint on the HPC handler ramp.
- Memory cost inflation is not passed through to customers, keeping gross margin in the low 40s as systems revenue grows.
- One of the four qualified HPC customers delays, dual-sources, or fails to convert, moving the AI revenue line materially.
- Automotive stays weak into 2027, leaving the core recovery dependent on industrial and computing alone.
Looking Ahead
Over the next 12 months Cohu faces a capacity test more than a demand test. Malaysia handler output is scheduled to rise about 50% over six months and roughly double by mid-2027, with a stated path to triple that output by end-2027 if the market takes it there. One in-qualification customer is expected to give a green light 'within a month' of the July call and a fifth by mid Q1 FY2027.
- Within a month of Jul 30 callFirst HPC qualification — One in-qualification customer expected to give a green light.
- 2H 2026Largest software deal expands — Expansion of the largest single-customer software subscription.
- Mid Q1 FY2027Fifth customer qualification — Fifth in-qualification HPC customer expected to complete.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $402M | $453M | $522M | +12.7% |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 34.4% | 39.2% | 955bps |
| EBITDA | −$19M | −$7M | $13M | +63.9% |
| EBITDA Margin | -4.8% | -1.5% | 2.5% | +323bps |
| Net Income | −$70M | −$74M | −$39M | -6.3% |
| Free Cash Flow | −$8M | $11M | $35M | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)39.2%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)2.5%
- Net Margin (TTM)-7.4%
- ROIC-4.4%
- FCF Conversion268.5%
- SBC / Revenue4.6%
The Company
Cohu sells the equipment, consumables and software that chipmakers and outsourced assembly-and-test houses use at the back end of semiconductor production — testing whether a finished device works and inspecting whether it was built correctly. The FY2025 10-K describes it as 'a global supplier of equipment and services optimizing semiconductor manufacturing yield and productivity.' Its AI relevance is concentrated in two products: the Eclipse thermal handler, which holds high-power AI processors at precise temperatures during final test, and the Neon platform, which inspects HBM memory stacks.
Cohu reports as a single segment, Semiconductor Test and Inspection Equipment, with three internal operating segments — Test Handler, Semiconductor Tester and Interface Solutions — aggregated under shared accounting criteria. It runs 11 locations. The manufacturing-bearing sites in Melaka, Malaysia (117,000 sq ft), Calamba City in the Philippines (92,000 sq ft), Kolbermoor, Germany (83,000 sq ft) and Osaka, Japan (67,000 sq ft) are owned; Singapore and Lincoln, Rhode Island are leased. The 10-K states that Cohu depends on Jabil to manufacture most of its semiconductor test systems from a facility in Malaysia. Revenue is heavily Asia-weighted: by shipment destination in Q1 FY2026, Malaysia was $20.8M, the Philippines $16.8M, Taiwan $14.8M, China $13.5M and the rest of the world $59.2M.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
In HPC thermal handlers, management describes an effectively single-competitor market: Hon Precision of Taiwan, which it calls the long-time supplier at test subcontractors, framing the market as effectively a duopoly. The 10-K competitor list is broader — Advantest, Teradyne, Hon Precision, KLA and other Asia-based manufacturers. Management's stated differentiator is thermal control. Adjacent pressure is real: Teradyne's compute revenue grew 600% year over year and KLA's advanced packaging process-control business is expected at about $1.1B in calendar 2026, though in different sockets and segments.
- Hon PrecisionNamed in the 10-K competitor list and on the Q2 FY2026 call as the primary HPC handler rival, described by management as the long-time supplier at test subcontractors.
- AdvantestNamed in filings; not discussed.
- TeradyneListed in the 10-K as a primary competitor; the evidence places it in adjacent test segments rather than in HPC handlers, and its compute revenue grew 600% year over year.
- KLAListed in the 10-K as a primary competitor; the evidence describes its advanced packaging process-control business as much larger than Cohu's Neon inspection business.
Supply Chain
Cohu sells test and inspection equipment into the back end of the semiconductor chain — to chipmakers and outsourced assembly-and-test houses. Its one disclosed manufacturing dependency is Jabil, which builds most of its test systems in Malaysia. No neighbor named Cohu on its own call.
Related companies
See all Chip Making companies → · How this layer works: Chapter 1, The Chip →
More on COHU: Earnings recap