Mercury Systems, Inc. (MRCY) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure

Mkt cap · 52-wk · YTD · delayed
Updated Jul 11, 2026Q3 FY2026 reviewed
Mercury Systems designs mission‑critical processing platforms that may one day host AI at the tactical edge.
Book‑to‑bill 1.48
Record bookings of $348.3M drove backlog to $1.6B.
Domestic +17% YoY
Core U.S. revenue accelerated, now 88% of total.
EBITDA +46% YoY
Adj. EBITDA margin widened 360 bps to 15.3%.
RTX 17% of rev
Key customer concentration rose from 13% in FY2025.
The Buildout Takeaway
Mercury is shifting from lumpy development work toward a production‑driven growth cycle with structurally improving margins. The biggest risk is the growing reliance on RTX, now nearly a fifth of revenue.
19 analysts·12 Buy6 Hold1 Sell
Coverage is thin — only 5 price estimates, so no target is shown

Approaching mid‑single digits revenue growth · Mid‑teens adjusted EBITDA margin · Positive free cash flow
Important: The Buildout is a data analytics platform. Content is generated by algorithms and AI agents using public filings, earnings transcripts, and market data. This is not personalized investment advice.
Our View

The Verdict

Mercury designs mission‑critical processing systems that sit at the edge, where signals and data are first collected. It buys semiconductors from Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA, integrates them into ruggedized modules and secure servers, and sells to prime defense contractors like RTX and Lockheed Martin. Its Common Processing Architecture platform is the company’s bet on becoming the standard for secure edge processing, backed by DMEA‑certified facilities that few competitors can replicate.

Market Cap
Revenue (TTM)$967M
Revenue Growth+9.0%
EBITDA Margin (TTM)9.0%
Net Debt$322M
Earnings Beats6 of 7
P/E (TTM)
EV/EBITDA (TTM)

What We Like

  • Record backlog of $1.6B, up 18% YoY, with the 12‑month portion rising 10.3% sequentially.
  • Domestic revenue grew 17% YoY, showing core U.S. business accelerating without defense budget tailwinds.
  • Book‑to‑bill well above 1 signals demand outstripping shipments; trailing‑12‑month bookings also set a record at $1.23B.
  • Management is building a beat‑and‑raise track record, underpinned by conservative guidance that excludes pull‑forwards until material is in‑hand.
  • Low‑margin development backlog is burning off, clearing the path to targeted low‑mid 20% EBITDA margins.

What We’re Watching

  • RTX concentration hit 17% in Q3 — a slowdown in key programs would cut disproportionately into revenue.
  • Golden Dome and rearmament tailwinds may not materialize by end of CY2026 as management hopes.
  • Sole‑source suppliers can terminate with 30 days’ notice and discontinue components with 180 days’ notice; a disruption could choke deliveries.
  • Legacy low‑margin backlog still converting, and quarterly inventory reserve charges (e.g., $3M in Q3) can cause margin hiccups.
Bottom Line

The thesis is strengthening: Mercury has shifted from a development‑heavy past into a production‑driven growth cycle with record bookings, expanding margins, and a credible path toward long‑term margin targets. The open question is whether the demand surge is sustainable and whether pull‑forward revenue represents a structural improvement or one‑time acceleration.

Next upQ4 FY2026 results (ending June 2026) will test whether bookings stay at record levels and full‑year guidance of approaching mid‑single‑digit growth with mid‑teens EBITDA margin is met.
Last Quarter — Q3 FY2026

Earnings Beat

Mercury reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $235.8 million, up 11.5% organically, and gross margin of 29.3%, a 230‑basis‑point improvement year‑over‑year. The standout metric was record bookings of $348.3 million and a book‑to‑bill of 1.48, pushing backlog to approximately $1.6 billion.

MetricQ3 FY2026Q2 FY2026Q3 FY2025YoY
Revenue$236M$233M$211M+11.5%
Gross margin25.2%26.0%27.0%-180bps
EBITDA$25M$8M$3M+876.9%
EPS$-0.05$-0.25$-0.33−85.1%
Book‑to‑bill1.48n/an/a
none of those tailwinds are reflected in any of our bookings or our outlook, and we view them as all additive to the target profile.— Bill Ballhaus, CEO, 2026-05-05

Management tone: Management projected confidence grounded in a consistent pattern of execution. The tone was more buoyant than prior quarters, with guidance raised across the board. They provided direct answers on margin progression and working capital, while remaining candidly evasive on program‑specific impacts like the SCAR stop‑work order.

Management Guidance

For FY2026, management raised organic revenue growth guidance to 'approaching mid‑single digits' from low single digits, and adjusted EBITDA margin to 'mid‑teens' from 'approaching mid‑teens'. They reaffirmed positive free cash flow for the full year and expect Q4 free cash flow to be positive. The outlook does not include potential tailwinds from Golden Dome or rearmament.

Business Trajectory

Trajectory

Revenue has been volatile as programs moved from development to production. After a trough in early FY2025, quarterly revenue climbed from $204.4M to a high of $273.1M in Q4 FY2025 before settling around $230‑235M in recent quarters. Q3 FY2026 benefited from a $25M pull‑forward. GAAP EBITDA margin, which was in the low single digits for much of FY2025, jumped to 15.9% in Q4 FY2025 and remains volatile, dipping to 4.6% and 3.2% in Q1 and Q2 FY2026 before recovering to 10.8% in Q3, as the production mix improves and low‑margin development programs convert.

Revenue & Margin Trajectory
RevenueGross margin$0$100$200$249M$204M$223M$211M$273M$225M$233M$236M30%25%Q4'24Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2Q3
RevenueGross margin$0$100$200$249M$204M$223M$211M$273M$225M$233M$236M30%25%Q4'24Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2Q3
Gross margin as reported.
Share Price — 12 Months
$50$100$052-wk high $123Aug '25OctJan '26AprAug '26
52-week range $53–$123.
Share Price — 12 Months
$50$100$052-wk high $123Aug '25OctJan '26AprAug '26
52-week range $53–$123.
The Numbers

The Model

The model projects FY+1 revenue of $1,050 million and EBITDA of $131 million, a 12.5% margin. FY+2 sees revenue of $1,160 million and EBITDA of $183 million, lifting the margin to 15.8%. Near‑term growth is anchored by the record backlog and production ramp; FY+2 reflects further margin expansion as legacy low‑margin programs are replaced.

Revenue & EBITDA Projections
REVENUE$912M$1.1B$1.2BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$62M$131M$183M15.8%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
REVENUE$912M$1.1B$1.2BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$62M$131M$183M15.8%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
Solid bars are reported actuals; outlined bars are model projections — not company guidance.
MetricFY2025Next FY (E)Following FY (E)
Revenue$912M$1.1B$1.2B
YoY Growth+15.1%+10.5%
EBITDA$62M$131M$183M
EBITDA Margin6.8%12.5%15.8%

Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 0.2% above analyst consensus.

For FY2026, management raised organic revenue growth guidance to 'approaching mid‑single digits' from low single digits, and adjusted EBITDA margin to 'mid‑teens' from 'approaching mid‑teens'. They reaffirmed positive free cash flow for the full year and expect Q4 free cash flow to be positive. The outlook does not include potential tailwinds from Golden Dome or rearmament.

What Could Go Right — and Wrong

What good looks like
  • Sustained book‑to‑bill above 1.2 signals continued production momentum and pushes backlog to new records.
  • Golden Dome and rearmament contracts awarded, adding significant orders not currently in the outlook.
  • Gross margins cross 30% by FY2027 as legacy backlog converts, lifting EBITDA margins closer to the 20% target.
  • RTX concentration declines as other customer programs ramp, diversifying revenue.
  • Additional large production orders for CPA, similar to the Blue Raven 1,000‑unit contract, validate the platform's franchise.
What could go wrong
  • RTX reduces LTAMDS spending or shifts processing in‑house, materially reducing revenue.
  • Supply‑chain 'pull‑left' strategy falters, causing revenue lumpiness and missed guidance.
  • Book‑to‑bill drops below 1.0 as the demand surge proves temporary, eroding backlog growth.
  • Sole‑source component discontinuation forces redesigns, causing program delays and revenue shortfalls.
What’s Next

Looking Ahead

The next twelve months will test whether the production‑driven growth cycle can sustain momentum. Capacity expansion in Phoenix and the integration of the acquired process provider should de‑risk key programs, while the Blue Raven 1,000‑unit CPA order begins multi‑year deliveries. Management expects tailwinds from Golden Dome and defense budgets to potentially materialize by late calendar 2026, which could accelerate bookings. Quarterly lumpiness may persist despite supply‑chain improvements.

Catalysts
  • Q4 FY2026Q4 FY2026 earnings and bookings — Tests whether bookings surpass Q3's record $348M and full‑year guidance is met.
  • Late CY2026Potential Golden Dome awards — Tailwinds could translate into specific contracts, providing upside not yet in bookings.
  • Through FY2027Low‑margin backlog burns off — Legacy development programs nearly gone, enabling margin expansion to 20%+.
  • FY2027Blue Raven 1,000‑unit CPA deliveries begin — Multi‑year production contract starts, de‑risking medium‑term revenue.
  • FY2027CPA form‑factor expansion — New secure chiplet variants could open larger TAM for edge processing.
  • FY2027 and beyondDistributed AI at the edge — Long‑term vision; any AI‑related design wins would validate the platform.
Numbers

Financials

Annual Summary

MetricFY2025TTM
Revenue$912M$967M
Gross Margin27.6%27.7%
EBITDA$62M$119M
EBITDA Margin6.8%9.0%
Net Income−$38M−$14M
Free Cash Flow$119M$217M
Net Cash

Key Ratios (Trailing)

Valuation
  • P/E TTM
  • EV/EBITDA TTM
  • EV/Revenue TTM
  • Price/FCF TTM
Profitability
  • Gross Margin (TTM)27.7%
  • EBITDA Margin (TTM)9.0%
  • Net Margin (TTM)-1.5%
  • ROIC0.5%
  • FCF Conversion81.2%
  • SBC / Revenue3.6%
Reference

The Company

Mercury Systems designs and delivers mission‑critical processing systems to the edge — where signals and data are first collected — for aerospace and defense. It buys FPGAs, processors, and ASICs from semiconductor companies, integrates them into ruggedized modules, sub‑assemblies, and integrated solutions, and sells those to prime defense contractors like RTX, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman. Its products go into radars, electronic warfare, missile seekers, C4I, avionics, and space payloads.

The company operates more than 20 facilities, including DMEA‑certified trusted design and manufacturing sites in Andover, MA and Phoenix, AZ that provide a security moat. It runs three domestic business units — Signal Technologies, Processing Technologies, and Integrated Processing Solutions — plus an International unit with facilities in the UK, Spain, and Switzerland. Production is capital‑light, with most factories running on single shifts that can be expanded to meet demand.

Business Segments

Signal Technologies
RF and microwave components to integrated subsystems
Delivers RF/microwave components, modules, and subsystems for radar, EW, and missile seekers.
Growth driver: Land and space programs driving demand (missile defense, C4I, space
Processing Technologies
Rugged boards and servers
Provides embedded processing boards, rugged servers, and avionics mission computers.
Growth driver: Common Processing Architecture (CPA) platform expanding into secure
Integrated Processing Solutions
Complete subsystems
Builds integrated sensor‑processing chains on open‑standards chassis for C4I and missile defense.
Growth driver: Follow‑on production orders in missile, C4I, and space programs.

Competitive Landscape

Mercury competes with in‑house design teams at prime contractors like Lockheed and RTX, as well as defense electronics firms such as Curtiss‑Wright, BAE Systems, and Leonardo DRS. Its DMEA‑certified trusted manufacturing facilities and expertise in open‑standards processing create a moat that few competitors can replicate, though the risk of primes bringing processing in‑house remains.

  • Curtiss‑Wright Corporation
    Competitor in defense electronics and embedded systems, mentioned in 10‑K.
  • BAE Systems
    Competitor in rugged processing and electronic warfare systems, named in filings.
  • Leonardo DRS
    Competitor in defense electronics, referenced alongside other firms.
  • Kontron (KTN.DE)
    Competitor identified in 10‑K; competes in embedded computing.
  • In‑house design teams (Lockheed, RTX, Northrop)
    Can bring processing in‑house for key programs, reducing Mercury’s addressable market.
Competitors enumerated in 10‑K and competitive landscape section of intel file.

Supply Chain

Mercury sits between semiconductor component suppliers and defense prime contractors, integrating and ruggedizing processing systems. Its DMEA‑certified facilities are a moat, and it relies on sole‑source suppliers for custom ASICs, SRAM, and microprocessors.

Supplier
Intel (Altera)
Agilex 9 Direct RF FPGAs, Intel server‑class processors
Supplier
FPGAs
Supplier
GPUs for high‑performance embedded processing
Supplier
Unnamed sole‑source suppliers
Sole‑source custom ASICs, SRAM, microprocessors, chassis peripherals
Mission‑critical processing at the edge with trusted manufacturing certifications.
MRCY
Mercury designs and integrates ruggedized compute and RF systems, adding security and environmental hardening.
RTX Corporation
17% of Q3 revenue
Multiple programs including LTAMDS radar
Lockheed Martin
11%
Various programs
Northrop Grumman
<10% in Q3
Included in major programs
U.S. Navy
<10%
Down from 14% a year ago

Analysis updated Jul 11, 2026, reviewing Q3 FY2026. Prices delayed. Built with The Buildout’s published methodology. Not investment advice. No positions held. © The Buildout 2026.

More on MRCY: Earnings preview