Western Digital Corporation (WDC) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
Western Digital makes high-capacity hard disk drives that sit beneath the AI data load — not compute, not memory, but the economical mass-storage tier. It supplies the nearline systems where training, inference, agentic, and physical AI workloads accumulate data.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.8B |
| Revenue Growth | +9.1% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | 33.9% |
| Net Cash | $1.5B |
| Earnings Beats | 7 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- FY2026 revenue reached $12.9B, up 36% YoY, with gross margin expanding 970 bps to 49.1%.
- FQ4 FY26 gross margin hit 54.4%, and FQ1 FY27 guidance is 55%–56%.
- Long-term data storage growth view raised to greater than 25% CAGR.
- LTA discussions now extend to calendar 2029, 2030, and 2031.
- Balance sheet ended FQ4 at $500M net cash; FY26 free cash flow was $3.5B, a 27% margin.
What We’re Watching
- FQ4 exabytes grew 22% YoY, down from 34% in FQ3; management described hyperscale buying as lumpy.
- HAMR execution: 44TB HAMR is in qualification with four customers and targeted for 1H CY27; management declined to quantify HAMR mix by end of CY27.
- Cloud concentration: Cloud is 89% of total revenue, and top three customers were 17%, 15%, and 11% of FQ3 FY26 revenue.
- No unit capacity additions: exabyte growth depends on areal density, UltraSMR, ePMR, and HAMR transitions.
The thesis is strengthening: pricing per terabyte accelerated to high teens YoY, gross margin crossed 50%, the long-term demand view was raised, and visibility stretched toward 2031. The open question is whether WDC can execute the 40TB ePMR and HAMR transitions without giving back pricing or margin against Seagate.
Earnings Beat
Western Digital's FQ4 FY26 revenue reached $3.75B, up 44% YoY and at or above the high end of guidance. Gross margin came in at 54.4%, up 1,310 bps YoY. Exabytes shipped rose 22% YoY to 231, while Cloud revenue was $3.3B, 89% of total and up 43% YoY.
| Metric | Q3 FY2026 | Q2 FY2026 | Q3 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.3B | $3.0B | $2.3B | +45.5% |
| Gross margin | 50.2% | 45.7% | 39.8% | +1040bps |
| EBITDA | $1.3B | $1.1B | $870M | +47.8% |
| EPS | $8.52 | $4.90 | $1.46 | +482.4% |
| Exabytes shipped | 231 exabytes | 222 exabytes | n/a | +22% YoY |
During the quarter, the blended average year-over-year price increase per terabyte improved from high single digits last quarter to high teens this quarter, reflecting the impact of our predictable and sustainable pricing strategy as we deliver greater value to our customers.— Kris Sennesael, CFO, August 5, 2026
Management tone: Management shifted from a strong-quarter, improving-visibility tone in FQ3 to a structural, thesis-driven tone in FQ4. Pricing language strengthened from high single digits to high teens YoY, the long-term growth view was raised, and visibility was extended to 2029–2031 discussions.
Management Guidance
For FQ1 FY27, management guided revenue of $4.1B ± $100M, gross margin of 55% to 56%, diluted EPS of $4.00 ± $0.15, opex of $390M to $400M, and a 17% tax rate. Long-term exabyte growth was raised to greater than 25% CAGR, and cost per terabyte is expected to decline roughly 10% per year.
Trajectory
Trailing data through Q3 FY26 shows revenue rising from $2.8B in Q1 to $3.0B in Q2 and $3.3B in Q3, with gross margin expanding to 50.2%. FQ4 revenue then reached $3.75B, up 44% YoY, while gross margin hit 54.4%. The mix shifted toward price and product mix: FQ4 exabytes grew 22% YoY after FQ3 grew 34%, while price per terabyte moved to high teens YoY.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $17,300M and EBITDA of $7,629M, a 44.1% EBITDA margin, then FY+2 revenue of $21,250M and EBITDA of $9,988M, a 47.0% margin. The near-term anchor is Cloud pricing and the 40TB ePMR ramp; the FY+2 step assumes HAMR and UltraSMR add more capacity per drive.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.4B | $17.3B | $21.2B |
| YoY Growth | — | +51.8% | +22.8% |
| EBITDA | $3.1B | $7.6B | $10.0B |
| EBITDA Margin | 27.1% | 44.1% | 47.0% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 9.7% below analyst consensus.
For FQ1 FY27, management guided revenue of $4.1B ± $100M, gross margin of 55% to 56%, diluted EPS of $4.00 ± $0.15, opex of $390M to $400M, and a 17% tax rate. Long-term exabyte growth was raised to greater than 25% CAGR, and cost per terabyte is expected to decline roughly 10% per year.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- LTA discussions for calendar 2029–2031 convert into signed exabyte-based contracts.
- 40TB ePMR reaches >50% of nearline bits by FQ3 FY27, and UltraSMR approaches 60% of nearline exabyte shipments by exit FY27.
- 44TB HAMR ships in 1H CY27, followed by 50TB products in 2H CY27.
- High-bandwidth drives move from sampling with five customers to deployed design wins.
- Core cloud video-driven demand adds a durable non-AI leg to hyperscale storage growth.
- HAMR qualification or yield slips, delaying 44TB shipment beyond 1H CY27.
- A major hyperscaler pauses orders or shifts share; Cloud is 89% of revenue and top three customers were 17%, 15%, and 11% of FQ3 revenue.
- Exabyte growth stays below the >25% CAGR claim; FQ4 already decelerated to 22% YoY from 34% in FQ3.
- A competitive pricing cycle resumes once HAMR and areal-density gains loosen supply, reversing price per terabyte.
- Sole/single-source supply disruption or a slip in areal density and UltraSMR transitions caps exabyte output.
Looking Ahead
The next 12 months hinge on the 40TB ePMR volume ramp, first 44TB HAMR shipments in 1H CY27, and UltraSMR adoption toward roughly 60% of nearline exabytes by exit FY27. LTA discussions for 2029–2031 and the FQ1 FY27 gross margin guide of 55%–56% test whether the pricing and margin structure holds.
- FQ1 FY27FQ1 FY27 results — Tests $4.1B revenue and 55–56% gross margin guidance.
- 1H CY2744TB HAMR shipment — First volume HAMR; tests yield, reliability, and ramp.
- FQ3 FY2740TB ePMR mix target — Tests >50% of nearline bits on the 40TB platform.
- Exit FY27UltraSMR adoption target — Tests ~60% of nearline exabyte shipments via UltraSMR.
- 2H CY2750TB product launch — Next capacity step beyond 44TB HAMR.
- Ongoing2029–2031 LTA conversion — Tests whether discussions become signed multi-year contracts.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5B | $11.4B | $11.8B | +19.5% |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 38.1% | 45.4% | +1,405bps |
| EBITDA | $291M | $3.1B | $25.7B | +959.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 3.1% | 27.1% | 33.9% | +2,400bps |
| Net Income | −$806M | $1.9B | $6.5B | +331.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | −$781M | $1.3B | $10.6B | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)45.4%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)33.9%
- Net Margin (TTM)55.1%
- ROIC35.1%
- FCF Conversion72.9%
- SBC / Revenue1.7%
The Company
Western Digital is a pure-play HDD company after completing the Flash separation on February 21, 2025. It makes high-capacity nearline drives, ePMR drives up to 32TB, 40TB ePMR now entering volume production, 44TB HAMR in qualification, and UltraSMR software-defined capacity. These products supply the economical mass-storage layer hyperscalers use for AI and cloud data.
Manufacturing spans the U.S., China, Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand, with the largest manufacturing-related sites in Thailand and Penang, Malaysia. WDC deliberately avoids adding unit HDD capacity, investing instead in heads, media, and automation; capex was $108M in FQ4 FY26.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
The 10-K names WDC's HDD competitors as Seagate Technology Holdings plc and Toshiba Electronic Devices & Storage Corporation. The material's competitive discussion centers on Seagate, the direct HDD competitor with the most prominent public read-through. An analyst on WDC's FQ4 call challenged WDC's sequential growth and gross margin guide against that main competitor.
- Seagate Technology Holdings plcDirect HDD competitor; an analyst compared WDC's sequential growth and gross margin guide unfavorably to Seagate's.
- Toshiba Electronic Devices & Storage CorporationNamed in the 10-K as an HDD competitor; not otherwise discussed in the source material.
Supply Chain
WDC sits between a limited disclosed supplier base and a concentrated hyperscale/cloud customer set. No specific hyperscale customer names were disclosed on the earnings calls.
More on WDC: Earnings recap