Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
Ameresco designs, engineers, builds, owns, and operates energy infrastructure: energy-efficiency retrofits, distributed generation, battery storage, microgrids, and renewable fuels. Its link to the AI buildout is behind-the-meter power. Data-center developers, hyperscalers, and neoclouds increasingly need on-site generation because grid access is constrained or delayed, and Ameresco sells that as EPC projects — reciprocating engines, gas turbines, fuel cells, battery storage, and integrated microgrids — with an operations-and-maintenance stream attached after construction. Federal and military-base land through enhanced-use leases is a different siting route; management says military land has fewer land permitting requirements than commercial properties.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.0B |
| Revenue Growth | +8.9% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | 12.6% |
| Net Debt | $1.9B |
| Earnings Beats | 5 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- Awarded project backlog rose 65% to $4.4B in Q2 2026, on a record $1.8B of new awards — $1.2B of it data centers and $600M other key markets.
- Five awarded data-center projects plus the Lemoore asset collectively represent more than one gigawatt of power generation; Texas and Arizona were added to the footprint.
- Data-center EPC margin is anchored at 'high teens,' which CEO George Sakellaris says is what Ameresco gets on federal EPC work, and the projects run through ordinary percentage-of-completion accounting rather than a gain on sale.
- The recurring layer is compounding: O&M revenue grew 29% in Q2, third-party service covers over 2.5 GW of solar and battery storage, and long-term O&M backlog exceeds $1.5B.
- The Neogenyx Fuels joint venture with HASI closed with a $400M commitment — $300M into Neogenyx and $100M directly to Ameresco.
What We’re Watching
- Conversion cadence: awarded backlog takes 6–24 months to become contracted and up to three years to implement, and management ties it to commercial, permitting, procurement, financing, and execution milestones.
- Procurement: no long-lead equipment orders have been placed for the awarded data-center projects, while several larger peers describe pre-buying and supply constraints.
- Cash: Q2 working capital absorbed cash as work ran ahead of billing milestones; management calls cash conversion a key priority for the second half.
- Governance: CFO Mark Chiplock resigned effective 2026-09-25, after being the principal voice on the Neogenyx accounting, the tax-credit policy change, and the reaffirmed guidance. No successor is named in the source material.
The thesis is strengthening at the award level and intact at the operating level. Data centers went from pipeline language to $1.2B of awarded backlog in a single quarter, and the profit swing — gross margin from 14.1% to 17.7% and adjusted EBITDA from $40.5M to $62.8M — shows the base business can carry the build. But awards are not revenue. Management puts the major data-center impact in 2028–2030, no equipment has been ordered, and at March 31 the fully-contracted project backlog had slipped year over year while all the growth sat in awarded-but-unsigned. The open question is whether that awarded backlog converts on the promised timeline without giving up the high-teens margin.
Earnings Beat
Q2 2026 revenue was $515M, up 9% year over year. Gross margin improved to 17.7% from 14.1% in Q1, which management attributed to favorable business mix and strong execution. Adjusted EBITDA rose 12% to $62.8M, outpacing revenue growth, and net income attributable to common shareholders was $9.7M after a $18.3M loss in Q1. The headline was the order book: a record $1.8B of new awards, including $1.2B for data centers, lifted awarded project backlog 65% to $4.4B and total project backlog 32% to $6.7B.
| Metric | Q2 FY2026 | Q1 FY2026 | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $516M | $402M | $472M | +9.1% |
| Gross margin | 17.7% | 14.1% | 15.5% | +220bps |
| EBITDA | $74M | $39M | $53M | +40.0% |
| EPS | $0.18 | $-0.35 | $0.24 | −26.2% |
| Awarded project backlog | $4.4B | $2.8B | n/a | +65% |
| Total project backlog | $6.7B | $5.3B | n/a | +32% |
We said 6 months to 24 months. So most likely we will not see a big impact coming from the data centers till '28 and beyond. Between '28 to '30, you might see a small impact next year, but the major impact will be '28 to '30.— George Sakellaris, CEO, 2026-08-03
Management tone: The Q2 2026 call carried the most assertive tone in the record. Management called the quarter 'transformational' and used 'record' repeatedly. On the questions that mattered most they were direct and volunteered answers that cut against their own headline: the 2028–2030 revenue timing, the fact that no equipment orders have been placed, the working-capital cash absorption, and that the EPS guidance raise is tax- and accounting-driven rather than operational. They declined to discuss project-level risk allocation and liquidated damages.
Management Guidance
FY2026 guidance was reaffirmed across all metrics: revenue $2.0–2.2B and gross margin 17%–18%. Adjusted EBITDA is stated net of the 30% noncontrolling interest attributable to HASI in the biofuels business. Non-GAAP EPS was raised to $1.15–$1.35, driven by an expected tax benefit rate of 25%–40% and a planned transferable-tax-credit accounting policy change in the second half of 2026, with prior-period results to be recast. Management expects the second half to follow a normal seasonal cadence with activity weighted somewhat more toward Q4, and says the data-center contribution to 2026 is already baked in and not expected to be significant. The Q2 print beat the prior guide at the EBITDA line — $62.8M against $58–62M — and landed inside it on non-GAAP EPS.
Trajectory
Headline growth decelerated from 14% year over year in Q1 2026 to 9% in Q2, but the mix improved. Q2 revenue was $515M with gross margin of 17.7%, up from 14.1% in Q1, which management attributed to favorable business mix and strong execution; Q1's margin had been hurt by freeze-ups at three RNG plants and snow at solar sites. Inside Q2, energy-asset revenue grew 21% and O&M revenue grew 29%, while project revenue grew 6%. Management also noted Q1 had benefited from $20M–$30M of revenue pulled forward from the second quarter.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $2,150M and EBITDA of $280M, a 13.0% margin, then FY+2 revenue of $2,400M and EBITDA of $324M, a 13.5% margin. The near-term anchor is the reaffirmed FY2026 guidance range and the backlog already contracted, which converts over the following periods. The step up in FY+2 depends on awarded backlog converting — especially the awarded data-center projects — alongside the recurring O&M and owned energy-asset layers.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $2.1B | $2.4B |
| YoY Growth | — | +11.3% | +11.6% |
| EBITDA | $233M | $280M | $324M |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.0% | 13.0% | 13.5% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 4.5% above analyst consensus.
FY2026 guidance was reaffirmed across all metrics: revenue $2.0–2.2B and gross margin 17%–18%. Adjusted EBITDA is stated net of the 30% noncontrolling interest attributable to HASI in the biofuels business. Non-GAAP EPS was raised to $1.15–$1.35, driven by an expected tax benefit rate of 25%–40% and a planned transferable-tax-credit accounting policy change in the second half of 2026, with prior-period results to be recast. Management expects the second half to follow a normal seasonal cadence with activity weighted somewhat more toward Q4, and says the data-center contribution to 2026 is already baked in and not expected to be significant. The Q2 print beat the prior guide at the EBITDA line — $62.8M against $58–62M — and landed inside it on non-GAAP EPS.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- Awarded data-center backlog converts to signed contracts inside the stated 6–24 month window, opening the revenue clock.
- The current data-center award grows toward the $2 billion the CEO said he would not be surprised by.
- First long-lead equipment orders are placed at acceptable prices, protecting the high-teens EPC margin anchor.
- A Neogenyx-style capital vehicle for data centers is announced, funding the build without stretching the corporate balance sheet.
- The recurring layers keep compounding from an O&M backlog already exceeding $1.5B and third-party service covering over 2.5 GW.
- Awards sit un-contracted quarter after quarter; Lemoore has already remained in awarded backlog across two quarters.
- Equipment is secured late or at higher prices, compressing the high-teens EPC margin or forcing scope renegotiation.
- H2 cash flow does not reverse the Q2 working-capital absorption, pushing the capital-intensive build toward more external capital.
- Government concentration — 61.0% of FY2025 revenue and 57.2% from the largest 20 customers — persists while data-center revenue is still years away.
Looking Ahead
The next twelve months are about conversion rather than awards. Management has said the awarded data-center backlog takes 6–24 months to become contracted and up to three years to implement, with the major revenue impact in 2028–2030. Nearer in, the tests are whether cash conversion reverses the Q2 working-capital drag, whether the transferable-tax-credit accounting change lands with the promised prior-period recast, and whether a permanent CFO is named after Mark Chiplock's departure effective 2026-09-25.
- 2026-09-25CFO departure effective — Mark Chiplock's resignation takes effect; no successor named.
- H2 2026Tax-credit accounting change — Transferable-tax-credit policy adoption with prior-period recast.
- H2 2026Cash conversion test — Whether H2 reverses Q2's working-capital cash absorption.
- Q3/Q4 2026Back-half revenue cadence — Tests guided seasonality weighted somewhat more toward Q4.
- 6–24 monthsData-center conversion — Awards to contracted backlog; first long-lead equipment orders.
- 2028–2030Data-center revenue window — Management's stated timing for major data-center revenue impact.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.9B | $2.0B | +9.2% |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 15.6% | 16.1% | +97bps |
| EBITDA | $198M | $233M | $256M | +17.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 11.2% | 12.0% | 12.6% | +87bps |
| Net Income | $57M | $44M | $28M | -22.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | −$321M | −$332M | −$526M | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)16.1%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)12.6%
- Net Margin (TTM)1.4%
- ROIC3.5%
- FCF Conversion-205.6%
- SBC / Revenue1.0%
The Company
Ameresco designs, engineers, builds, owns, and operates energy infrastructure. Its portfolio runs from energy-efficiency work — building envelope, HVAC and indoor air quality, LED lighting, building controls, water efficiency — to generation and storage: solar, battery energy storage, cogeneration and combined heat and power, geothermal, hydropower, wind, and renewable natural gas. As of 2025-12-31 it owned and operated 227 small-scale renewable energy plants with combined capacity of roughly 838 megawatt equivalents, 224 of them across North America and three in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Customers have historically been government and institutional: about 61.0% of FY2025 revenue came from federal, state, provincial, or local government entities, and the largest 20 customers were about 57.2% of revenue.
The company operates as a developer and EPC contractor that also owns and operates assets, rather than a manufacturer or software company — it buys rather than manufactures. In Q2 2026 management reorganized the external story into two pillars, Power Infrastructure and Building & Public Infrastructure, and rebranded, while the 10-K's five reportable segments were unchanged: North America Regions, U.S. Federal, Renewable Fuels, Europe, and All Other. Behind that sits a recurring service layer — third-party operations and maintenance for more than 2.5 GW of solar and battery storage, with long-term O&M backlog exceeding $1.5B.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
Ameresco competes in several distinct fields, and the FY2025 10-K names competitors in each. In smart energy solutions the list runs from Honeywell, Johnson Controls, Schneider Electric, Siemens Building Technologies, and Trane to NORESCO (a Carrier unit), ABM Industries, Comfort Systems, EMCOR, Veolia, McKinstry, and others. In landfill gas and renewable natural gas it names Montauk Renewables, Vanguard Renewables, and Opal Fuels alongside landfill owners and divisions of large oil-and-gas companies. In solar PV and battery storage it names NextEra Energy, Engie SA, Invenergy, EDF Renewables, and Clearway Energy Group. The record shows Ameresco winning awards; it does not show whether it wins on capability, siting, or relationships.
- HoneywellNamed in the 10-K's competitive sets for both smart energy solutions and O&M services; not otherwise discussed.
- Johnson ControlsNamed in the 10-K's competitive sets for both smart energy solutions and O&M services; not otherwise discussed.
- NextEra EnergyNamed in the 10-K as a competitor in solar PV and battery storage; not otherwise discussed.
- Montauk RenewablesNamed in the 10-K as a competitor in landfill gas and renewable natural gas; not otherwise discussed.
- Opal FuelsNamed in the 10-K as a competitor in landfill gas and renewable natural gas; not otherwise discussed.
Supply Chain
Ameresco sits between equipment vendors and the customers who need on-site power, and it buys rather than manufactures. Two supply-chain neighbors name it directly: HASI, its $400M Neogenyx Fuels partner, and Terra Innovatum, which says Ameresco gives it federal and commercial deployment channels.
Related companies
See all Utilities & Energy companies → · How this layer works: Chapter 8, Grid, Gas & Fibre →
More on AMRC: Earnings recap