Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
Datadog is a software layer, not an infrastructure operator. It provides an AI-powered observability and security platform that monitors cloud applications, infrastructure, logs, AI workloads, and security events in one place. For the AI buildout, Datadog makes new infrastructure legible: GPU fleets, LLM chains, agents, and training runs become monitored workloads, and customers consolidate legacy tools onto one platform.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.7B |
| Revenue Growth | +29.5% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | 1.0% |
| Net Cash | $3.5B |
| Earnings Beats | 7 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- Growth is broad-based: total revenue rose 36% y/y in Q2 FY2026 (32% in Q1), while non-AI customer revenue growth reached high-20s, up from 18% a year-ago quarter.
- New-logo economics improved structurally: annualized bookings more than doubled y/y, average land size set records, and new customers contributed ~30% of y/y revenue growth in Q2, up from 25% in Q1.
- Platform consolidation is deepening: 58% of customers use 4+ products, 37% use 6+, 13% use 10+, and customers with ARR ≥$100K hold ~91% of ARR.
- AI is a diversifying vector: 750+ AI customers include 31 spending >$1M and 8 >$10M annually; all 10 of the top 10 AI leaders are customers; MCP tool calls grew >22x versus Q4 2025.
- Cash generation is strong: Q2 FCF $279M (25% margin), $5.0B cash, and capex plus capitalized software guided at 4–5% of revenue.
What We’re Watching
- Largest customer usage reduction begins Q3 FY2026; Q3 guidance is 28–29% y/y versus Q2’s 36% reported, with Q4 implied to reaccelerate.
- Gross margin declined to 79.6% in Q2 from 80.2% prior quarter and 80.9% year-ago; management kept the 80% plus-or-minus expectation.
- Total customer count added only ~200 sequentially (to ~33,400), with nearly all net adds in the ≥$100K cohort; management attributes the low end to free/contract boundary noise.
- AI training revenue remains early and concentrated: Q2 added two 7-figure neuro-lab deals after Q1’s 7- and 8-figure hyperscaler lab wins, but breadth beyond frontier labs is unproven.
The thesis is strengthening: revenue growth accelerated to 36% in Q2, the non-AI base reaccelerated to high-20s, new-logo productivity set records, and AI training moved from not a market to real wins at hyperscaler and frontier labs. The offset is the largest customer’s disclosed usage reduction starting Q3, which management has derisked in guidance but leaves the trajectory dependent on Q4 reacceleration. The key open question is whether non-AI growth holds at high-20s through the derisked Q3 and whether the largest customer stabilizes.
Earnings Beat
Datadog reported Q2 FY2026 revenue of $1.12B, up 36% year-over-year and 11% sequentially, with a record $115M sequential dollar add. Non-GAAP gross margin was 79.6%, down from 80.2% in Q1 and 80.9% a year ago; non-GAAP operating income was $257M (23% margin), and free cash flow was $279M (25% margin). Non-AI customer revenue growth reached the high-20s percent, up from mid-20s in Q1 and 18% a year ago.
| Metric | Q1 FY2026 | Q4 FY2025 | Q1 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $953M | $762M | +32.1% |
| Gross margin | 79.2% | 80.4% | 79.3% | -10bps |
| EBITDA | $25M | $25M | −$1M | −2200.0% |
| EPS | $0.14 | $0.13 | $0.07 | +112.9% |
| Total RPO | $3.47B | $3,484.4M | n/a | +43% y/y |
we did chose to fully derisk our largest customer. And the reason for that is we don’t want that to be an overhang on what is otherwise business that is accelerating and performing extremely well.— Olivier Pomel, August 6, 2026
Management tone: Management’s tone on the Q2 call was confident and deliberately transparent, especially on the largest customer. The shift from Q1 is that the largest customer went from an abstract conservatism item to a concrete disclosed usage reduction, while management framed the rest of the business as booming and highlighted five quarters of acceleration excluding that customer.
Management Guidance
For Q3 FY2026, management guided revenue to $1.135B–$1.145B (+28–29% y/y) and non-GAAP operating margin to 23–24%. For FY2026, revenue guidance was raised to $4.45B–$4.47B (~30% y/y) and non-GAAP operating margin to ~23%. Management reiterated capex plus capitalized software of 4–5% of revenue and held gross margin expectation at 80% plus or minus; the Q3 sequential guide deliberately reflects the largest customer’s usage reduction.
Trajectory
Reported revenue growth accelerated from 32% y/y in Q1 FY2026 to 36% in Q2, with the $115M sequential add the largest on record. Non-AI customer revenue growth reached the high-20s percent, up from mid-20s in Q1 and 18% a year ago, and new-customer contribution to y/y growth rose to ~30%. Gross margin slipped to 79.6% from 80.2% and 80.9% a year ago on cloud-hosting cost growth, while non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 23% from 20% a year ago on OpEx leverage.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $4,490M and EBITDA of $189M (4.2% margin), and FY+2 revenue of $5,700M with EBITDA of $428M (7.5% margin). The FY+1 revenue figure sits just above the midpoint of management’s raised FY2026 revenue guide of $4.45B–$4.47B and reflects the largest-customer derisking in guidance; FY+2 assumes continued broad-based growth and operating leverage as new-logo ramps and AI/agentic usage convert.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.4B | $4.5B | $5.8B |
| YoY Growth | — | +31.3% | +28.0% |
| EBITDA | $11M | $162M | $357M |
| EBITDA Margin | 0.3% | 3.6% | 6.2% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 9.3% above analyst consensus.
For Q3 FY2026, management guided revenue to $1.135B–$1.145B (+28–29% y/y) and non-GAAP operating margin to 23–24%. For FY2026, revenue guidance was raised to $4.45B–$4.47B (~30% y/y) and non-GAAP operating margin to ~23%. Management reiterated capex plus capitalized software of 4–5% of revenue and held gross margin expectation at 80% plus or minus; the Q3 sequential guide deliberately reflects the largest customer’s usage reduction.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- Non-AI customer revenue growth holds at high-20s or better through Q3/Q4, confirming five quarters of core acceleration continue.
- The largest customer’s usage reduction is contained to Q3, and the account resumes expansion in 2027.
- Training-workload adoption broadens beyond frontier labs and hyperscaler research divisions into a repeatable motion.
- Agentic traffic converts to paid platform usage across Agent Console, Agent Observability, and LLM Observability.
- BYOC metrics/traces reach GA and produce more petabyte-scale displacements beyond the >$30M TCV media deal.
- Largest customer usage reduction is deeper or longer than derisked, and Q4 reacceleration implied by guidance fails.
- Non-AI base decelerates toward mid-20s or below, removing the engine that currently carries growth.
- AI cost-optimization focus and pricing changes (AI credits, Infinite Cardinality) decouple AI usage volume from revenue.
- Gross margin breaks below the 80% plus-or-minus range and stays there as cloud-hosting costs scale.
- Training and agentic revenue stay concentrated among a small set of frontier labs and hyperscalers.
Looking Ahead
The next twelve months turn on whether the derisked Q3 step-down is followed by the implied Q4 reacceleration and whether non-AI growth holds in the high-20s. Management also pointed to a product wave still rolling out from DASH (100+ capabilities), the integration of Adaptive ML for time-series and post-training models, BYOC metrics/traces expansion, and an early federal pipeline after FedRAMP High; none of these carries a precise revenue date in the source.
- Q3 FY2026Q3 results vs. guide — Tests largest-customer derisking and whether non-AI growth stays high-20s.
- Q2 10-Q filingAI-native cohort disclosure — Shows Q2 AI-native growth after Q1's high-single-digit print.
- Q4 FY2026Q4 results vs. implied guide — Tests the guided sequential reacceleration after the Q3 step-down.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $3.4B | $3.7B | +27.7% |
| Gross Margin | 80.8% | 79.9% | 79.9% | 92bps |
| EBITDA | $97M | $11M | $114M | -88.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 3.6% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 330bps |
| Net Income | $184M | $108M | $136M | -41.4% |
| Free Cash Flow | $836M | $1.0B | $3.4B | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)79.9%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)1.0%
- Net Margin (TTM)3.7%
- ROIC-3.8%
- FCF Conversion2863.4%
- SBC / Revenue21.3%
The Company
Datadog is a SaaS platform for AI-powered observability and security across cloud applications. It integrates infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring, log management, user-experience monitoring, cloud security, service management, and many adjacent capabilities into one real-time view of a customer’s technology stack. That consolidation is the core promise: instead of running separate tools for APM, logs, RUM, and SIEM, customers see the whole stack and increasingly adopt more Datadog products, with 58% of customers using at least four products and 37% using at least six.
The model is usage-based and cloud-run. Management has repeatedly said most workloads run in the cloud, so costs appear in operating expenses rather than heavy capital expenditure; FY2026 capex plus capitalized software is guided at 4–5% of revenue. The 10-K lists only leased office facilities — the principal executive office in New York (~395,000 sq ft, leases to June 2033) and other leased offices in Boston, Denver, San Francisco, Paris, Dublin, Amsterdam, Sydney, Tokyo, Singapore, and Seoul. Datadog does not report formal operating segments.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
Datadog’s competitive dynamic is fragmented across categories. The 10-K names IBM, Microsoft, and SolarWinds in on-premise infrastructure monitoring; Cisco, New Relic, and Dynatrace in APM; Cisco and Elastic in log management; and native cloud-monitoring solutions from AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. In disclosed deals, replacement direction has run toward Datadog — four tools displaced at an online media company, three legacy APM tools at an insurer, an entire on-prem layer at a hedge fund — while competitive pressure comes from hyperscaler native tools and the named APM/log vendors.
- Named in 10-K for APM and log management.
- Microsoft / Microsoft AzureNamed in 10-K for on-premise infrastructure monitoring and cloud monitoring.
- New RelicNamed in 10-K for APM.
- DynatraceNamed in 10-K for APM.
- IBMNamed in 10-K for on-premise infrastructure monitoring.
Supply Chain
Datadog is a software layer, not an infrastructure operator. Its primary input is third-party cloud infrastructure, disclosed in the Q1 10-Q as a driver of cost of revenue.
More on DDOG: Earnings recap