Dnow Inc. (DNOW) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
DNOW is a distributor and light fabricator of pipe, valves and fittings, pumps and process equipment. It does not build or own the projects it supplies; it stocks, modifies and delivers the parts that go into them. In the AI-infrastructure buildout its role is physical and second-order: valves and pipe for data-center cooling loops, pumps and fluid-handling equipment, automation and controls, plus the midstream pipe and compressor-station packages that move feed gas to power generation. Management does not use the word "AI" on its calls, and the company captures none of the compute or networking layer.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.1B |
| Revenue Growth | +69.8% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | -0.9% |
| Net Debt | $517M |
| Earnings Beats | 5 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- Q2 2026 revenue rose 10% sequentially to $1.3B, above guidance, and adjusted EBITDA jumped 54% to $60M, a 4.6% margin.
- U.S. midstream crossed a $1 billion annualized revenue rate for the first time; gas utilities rose 15% sequentially to an 11-quarter high.
- Cost synergies have been raised twice — $17M to $23M to $30M on a 2026 exit-rate basis — with the $70M year-three target unchanged.
- Q2 operating cash flow was a record $133M, turning year-to-date cash flow to positive $38M after a $95M Q1 outflow.
- Data-center revenue was revised up within one quarter from about $30M to $40M-$50M for 2026.
What We’re Watching
- Adjusted gross margin slipped to 20.8% in Q2 from 21.6% in Q1 on $4M of aged-inventory charges and about $4M of lower international vendor consideration.
- Recovered revenue came back at what management calls "teaser level margins"; how sticky those concessions are is unresolved.
- ERP temporary costs of about $8.5M a quarter taper by only about $1M in each of Q3 and Q4, and the program runs into 2027 by management's own account.
- A securities class action alleges MRC ERP integration failures were omitted from the merger proxy; the lead-plaintiff deadline is October 2, 2026.
The thesis is strengthening on the operating line but not settled. Guidance was delayed, then reinstated, then raised; the synergy target moved up twice; and the Q1-to-Q2 margin and cash-flow inflection is visible in the reported numbers. Offsetting that, the organic trend was negative before the recovery started — Q1 2026 revenue was up 97.5% year over year on the acquisition but down $128M pro forma — and adjusted gross margin is still going the wrong way. The open question is whether the rebound is a durable re-rating of the combined platform or a recovery off a self-inflicted, still-not-fully-remediated ERP trough.
Earnings Beat
DNOW's second quarter of 2026 produced revenue of $1.3 billion, up $124 million, or 10%, sequentially and above management's guidance. Adjusted gross profit was $272 million, a 20.8% margin, down from 21.6% in Q1. Adjusted EBITDA rose 54% sequentially to $60 million, a 4.6% margin, and cash from operations reached a second-quarter record of $133 million.
| Metric | Q2 FY2026 | Q1 FY2026 | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B | $628M | +108.1% |
| Gross margin | 18.6% | 16.3% | 22.9% | -430bps |
| EBITDA | $24M | −$22M | $49M | −51.0% |
| EPS | $-0.12 | $-0.24 | $0.24 | −148.9% |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $60M | $39M | n/a | +54% sequential |
| Operating cash flow | $133M | -$95M | n/a | Record Q2 |
there's no doubt that recapturing some of these projects with those customers, gaining back some of the market share did require some teaser level margins to get back in the door, but we see that as an opportunity now as we reestablish ourselves…— David Cherechinsky, President and CEO, 2026-08-06
Management tone: Management's posture shifted from defensive to offensive between the two quarters. In May 2026, CEO David Cherechinsky said he was confident the business had bottomed in Q1 and guidance was delayed amid ERP problems; by the August call he called Q2 "an important step forward" and said he was "thrilled with our significantly improved performance." The call carried several candid admissions — that recaptured revenue came back at "teaser level margins," that Q4 would decline seasonally, and that the ERP temporary cost bucket ran about $8.5 million a quarter — alongside a decision not to give a count of remaining SAP conversions.
Management Guidance
Management guides FY2026 revenue to approach approximately $5 billion to $5.1 billion and an EBITDA margin to approach 4.5%, and added Q3 detail: revenue up sequentially in the low- to mid-single-digit range at a 5.0%-5.5% EBITDA margin, described as above the prior guide. It expects a Q4 sequential revenue decline modeled somewhat better than history, citing DNOW's historical 6%-8% Q3-to-Q4 decline, MRC's roughly 10% and gas utilities' roughly 13%. ERP temporary costs fall about $1 million in Q3 and another $1 million in Q4 from about $8.5 million in Q2. It guides another $25 million-$50 million of inventory reduction and another $25 million-$50 million of receivables reduction, mostly in Q4, a GAAP effective tax rate in the mid- to high single digits, Q3 D&A of about $24 million and slightly lower Q3 interest expense. The FY2026 operating cash flow range of $100 million-$200 million was not explicitly reaffirmed on the Q2 call.
Trajectory
Sequential revenue growth slowed from 23% in Q1 2026 to 10% in Q2, though both prints landed above guidance. The reported margin series is distorted by acquisition accounting: gross margin collapsed to 7.1% in Q4 FY2025 on $135 million of inventory-related charges, then recovered to 16.3% in Q1 and 18.6% in Q2 as those charges narrowed. On the company's adjusted basis, gross margin slipped from 21.6% to 20.8% between the two quarters on $4 million of aged-inventory charges and about $4 million of lower international vendor consideration. Adjusted EBITDA margin moved the other way, from 3.3% to 4.6%, and cash from operations swung from a $95 million first-quarter outflow to a record $133 million second-quarter inflow.
The Model
Our model projects FY+1 revenue of $5,107.5 million and EBITDA of $230 million, a 4.5% margin, and FY+2 revenue of $5,467.5 million with EBITDA of $350 million, a 6.4% margin. The near-term figure lines up with management's own FY2026 guide of roughly $5.0 billion to $5.1 billion in revenue at about a 4.5% EBITDA margin. FY+2's $350 million matches the 2027 EBITDA level management has called plausible but not guidance, built from 6.5%-7% revenue growth and modest gross-margin improvement. What anchors the near term is MRC integration, revenue recapture and the synergy ramp; what drives FY+2 is operating leverage on that recovered volume.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.8B | $5.1B | $5.5B |
| YoY Growth | — | +81.1% | +7.0% |
| EBITDA | $54M | $230M | $350M |
| EBITDA Margin | 1.9% | 4.5% | 6.4% |
Projections are the median of 4 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 2.9% above analyst consensus.
Management guides FY2026 revenue to approach approximately $5 billion to $5.1 billion and an EBITDA margin to approach 4.5%, and added Q3 detail: revenue up sequentially in the low- to mid-single-digit range at a 5.0%-5.5% EBITDA margin, described as above the prior guide. It expects a Q4 sequential revenue decline modeled somewhat better than history, citing DNOW's historical 6%-8% Q3-to-Q4 decline, MRC's roughly 10% and gas utilities' roughly 13%. ERP temporary costs fall about $1 million in Q3 and another $1 million in Q4 from about $8.5 million in Q2. It guides another $25 million-$50 million of inventory reduction and another $25 million-$50 million of receivables reduction, mostly in Q4, a GAAP effective tax rate in the mid- to high single digits, Q3 D&A of about $24 million and slightly lower Q3 interest expense. The FY2026 operating cash flow range of $100 million-$200 million was not explicitly reaffirmed on the Q2 call.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- Recaptured revenue migrates from teaser margins to normal price levels, lifting gross margin rather than diluting it.
- The ERP program completes across the remaining MRC U.S. locations and the roughly $8.5M quarterly temporary cost falls away.
- Midstream, gas utilities and data-center demand keep growing at Q2's rates, holding the mix toward more durable end markets.
- Cost synergies reach the roughly $30M 2026 exit rate and progress toward the $70M year-three target.
- Working capital keeps releasing cash, funding further share repurchases.
- Teaser margins prove permanent, leaving recovered volume at a structurally lower gross margin.
- The Q4 seasonal revenue decline comes in worse than the 6%-13% history, putting the full-year revenue guide at risk.
- Downstream turnaround pre-buys fail to appear, pushing the recovery past Q1 2027.
- ERP disruption recurs at a converted location, or the remaining conversions slip.
- The securities class action builds into a longer legal and disclosure overhang.
Looking Ahead
Over the next twelve months the story turns on whether the sequential recovery holds through a seasonal fourth-quarter decline and into a downstream turnaround season that lands in Q1 2027. Management guides Q3 revenue up low-to-mid single digits sequentially at a 5.0%-5.5% EBITDA margin, expects a Q4 decline somewhat better than history, and looks for another $25 million-$50 million each of inventory and receivables to come out of working capital. Cost synergies reach a roughly $30 million exit rate, ERP temporary costs step down modestly, and data-center revenue is guided at $40 million-$50 million. A securities class action's lead-plaintiff deadline falls on October 2, 2026.
- Late Q3 2026Downstream pre-buy activity — First physical tell of the Q1 2027 turnaround recovery.
- Oct 2, 2026Class-action lead-plaintiff deadline — Tests the disclosure overhang tied to the merger proxy.
- Nov 2026Q3 2026 earnings — Tests guided low-to-mid single-digit growth and 5.0%-5.5% margin.
- Q4 2026Seasonal revenue decline — Tests whether the decline tracks better than the 6%-13% history.
- Q1 2027Downstream turnaround execution — Tests the recovery pointed at the strongest downstream quarter.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.4B | $2.8B | $4.1B | +18.8% |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 19.0% | 15.9% | 370bps |
| EBITDA | $147M | $54M | −$37M | -63.3% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.2% | 1.9% | -0.9% | 428bps |
| Net Income | $81M | −$75M | −$187M | -192.6% |
| Free Cash Flow | $289M | $134M | $136M | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)15.9%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)-0.9%
- Net Margin (TTM)-4.6%
- ROIC-3.4%
- SBC / Revenue0.8%
The Company
DNOW is a distributor and light fabricator serving energy and industrial end markets. It stocks and delivers pipe, valves and fittings, pumps, gas products, and process and production equipment — the physical parts that go into oil and gas, utility and industrial projects. In the AI-infrastructure buildout that means valves and pipe for data-center cooling, pumps and fluid-handling equipment, automation and controls, and the midstream pipe and compressor-station packages that move feed gas to power generation. The 10-K calls the company "a premier provider of energy and industrial solutions, serving as a global leader in the distribution of pipe, valves and fittings, and pumps."
DNOW operates through three reporting segments — U.S., Canada and International — from roughly 300 locations with about 5,300 employees. The U.S. is 83% to 85% of revenue, with about 210 locations; Canada has about 35, mostly in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba; and international has about 55. It is not vertically integrated: it distributes and light-fabricates rather than manufacturing at scale, and its contracts are predominantly one year or less, with no backlog disclosed. Its one specifically named facility is a valve engineering and modification center in La Porte, Texas. The MRC Global acquisition, completed in November 2025, roughly doubled revenue and added the MRC Global brand.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
DNOW does not describe its competitive position in detail on its calls. What management does say is that the MRC combination removed internal competition — it is "no longer competing in the Permian, where we were going to head to head against each other" — and that the combined product range and geographic coverage expand its commercial reach. It also confirms that winning back lost share required price concessions, which implies customers had alternatives. The supply-chain wiring map classifies Applied Industrial Technologies, DXP Enterprises, Ferguson, Grainger and MSC Industrial as competitors; those are file classifications, not company statements. On data centers the competitive set is wider and less identified.
- Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT)Classified as a competitor in the supply-chain wiring map; not discussed by the company.
- DXP Enterprises (DXPE)Classified as a competitor in the supply-chain wiring map; not discussed by the company.
- Ferguson (FERG)Classified as a competitor in the supply-chain wiring map; not discussed by the company.
- Grainger (GWW)Classified as a competitor in the supply-chain wiring map; not discussed by the company.
- MSC Industrial (MSM)Classified as a competitor in the supply-chain wiring map; not discussed by the company.
Supply Chain
DNOW sits between equipment manufacturers and the energy, utility and industrial customers that build projects. It buys valves, pumps, pipe and controls from suppliers, then stocks, modifies and delivers them locally. Of the labeled ecosystem neighbors scanned, none names DNOW directly.
More on DNOW: Earnings recap