Keel Infrastructure Corp. (KEEL) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure

Mkt cap · 52-wk · YTD · delayed
Updated Aug 12, 2026Q1 FY2026 reviewed
Keel Infrastructure develops powered, permitted data center capacity for HPC and AI workloads across North America.
2.2 GW pipeline
Power capacity pipeline includes PJM, Québec and Washington sites.
$819M liquidity
Up from $533M in May; funds SG&A through 2028 per management.
First HPC rev 2027
Moses Lake expected first HPC revenue-generating site.
No HPC lease signed
No HPC/AI revenue yet; current income is legacy Bitcoin mining.
The Buildout Takeaway
KEEL's story rests on turning near-term power into signed leases. Until that happens, the income statement is still a shrinking, loss-making Bitcoin business.
4 analysts·4 Buy0 Hold0 Sell
Coverage is thin — only 3 price estimates, so no target is shown

Cash SG&A tracking about $100M for 2026 · Bitcoin hashrate ~14 EH/s to ~5 EH/s by end-2026 · three leases targeted year-end 2026 in Q1; not reaffirmed in Q2
Important: The Buildout is a data analytics platform. Content is generated by algorithms and AI agents using public filings, earnings transcripts, and market data. This is not personalized investment advice.
Our View

The Verdict

KEEL develops, owns, and plans to operate data centers and energy infrastructure for HPC and AI workloads. It sells the physical layer the AI buildout needs: permitted, developable capacity near constrained power, to be leased to hyperscalers, cloud providers, AI companies, and enterprises. The company is the former Bitfarms Bitcoin mining business, now deliberately winding down mining to convert its assets into HPC campuses.

Market Cap
Revenue (TTM)$199M
Revenue Growth−4.8%
EBITDA Margin (TTM)-24.9%
Net Debt$234M
Earnings Beats2 of 7
P/E (TTM)
EV/EBITDA (TTM)

What We Like

  • $819 million liquidity as of August 7, 2026, supports site development and cash SG&A through 2028 per management.
  • 2.2 GW power capacity pipeline, with PJM interconnections in Pennsylvania and approximately 100% renewable hydro capacity in Québec and Washington.
  • Management says new large-load interconnections in PJM, Québec, and Washington can take 4 to 10 years, and KEEL has already done that long-lead work.
  • Ganesh Aiyer joined as President of Keel in July 2026 after nearly seven years as Digital Realty's Chief Business Officer, leading commercial efforts.
  • Pre-purchased Vertiv modules delivered to Moses Lake; transformers delivered at Sharon; fiber contracts across all three U.S. sites began execution.

What We’re Watching

  • No signed HPC/AI lease and no HPC revenue; first HPC revenue is not expected until 2027.
  • Q2 call did not explicitly reaffirm Q1's target of signing three leases by year-end 2026.
  • Panther Creek environmental permits are taking a few months longer than anticipated; Moses Lake is delayed a couple of months.
  • No company-specific CapEx guidance; management pointed analysts to industry rules of thumb.
Bottom Line

The structural half of the thesis has strengthened: liquidity, equipment, permitting progress, and commercial leadership all moved forward. The commercial half remains unproven, and the Q2 call softened the year-end three-lease target. The open question is whether KEEL can convert stated demand into a first signed, financeable HPC lease.

Next upMoses Lake go-vertical permitting is expected to wrap later in Q3 2026; it tests whether the first HPC site stays on its 2027 path.
Last Quarter — Q1 FY2026

Earnings

Q2 2026 revenue was $30 million, down from $61 million a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA was negative $24 million versus positive $7 million a year earlier, and the operating loss of $141 million included $63 million of accelerated depreciation tied to mining shutdowns at Panther Creek and Scrubgrass.

MetricQ1 FY2026Q4 FY2025Q1 FY2025YoY
Revenue$37M$15M$67M−44.6%
Gross margin-71.1%-65.0%-0.8%-7030bps
EBITDA−$25M−$26M−$3M+840.7%
EPS$-0.24$-0.25$-0.07+236.2%
Total liquidity$819M (Aug 7, 2026)$533M (May 8, 2026)n/a
A lease is not a trophy for a press release, it is a 15-year commitment of infrastructure, credit and trust.— Benjamin Gagnon, CEO, August 10, 2026

Management tone: Management shifted from Q1's transformational, target-focused posture to a more patient, negotiation-focused tone on the Q2 call. It did not explicitly reaffirm the year-end three-lease target, emphasized lease economics over speed, and described itself as "incredibly optimistic" while declining to name tenants or detail negotiation status.

Management Guidance

No formal revenue, margin, or EPS guidance was issued. Management's project-level guidance includes cash SG&A tracking about $100 million for 2026, Bitcoin hashrate declining from about 14 EH/s to roughly 5 EH/s by end-2026, and first HPC revenue in 2027. It did not explicitly reaffirm the Q1 target of signing three leases by year-end 2026.

Business Trajectory

Trajectory

Revenue is decelerating and margins are compressing through the transition. Q1 FY2026 revenue was $37.0 million with gross margin of -71.1% and EBITDA margin of -68.8%; the Q2 2026 call showed revenue of $30 million and adjusted EBITDA of negative $24 million. The weakness reflects the deliberate wind-down of Bitcoin mining and rising depreciation, infrastructure, and energy costs, not the HPC segment, which remains pre-revenue.

Revenue & Margin Trajectory
RevenueGross margin$0$50$16M$7M$7M$5M$4M$8M$10M$10M$9M$7M$7M$11M$28M$37M$45M$60M$40M$42M$33M$27M$30M$36M$35M$46M$50M$42M$45M$56M$67M$78M$69M$15M$37M68%-71%Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26
RevenueGross margin$0$50$16M$7M$7M$5M$4M$8M$10M$10M$9M$7M$7M$11M$28M$37M$45M$60M$40M$42M$33M$27M$30M$36M$35M$46M$50M$42M$45M$56M$67M$78M$69M$15M$37M68%-71%Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26
Gross margin as reported.
Share Price — 12 Months
$2$4$6$052-wk high $6Aug '25NovFeb '26MayAug '26
52-week range $1–$6.
Share Price — 12 Months
$2$4$6$052-wk high $6Aug '25NovFeb '26MayAug '26
52-week range $1–$6.
The Numbers

The Model

The model projects FY+1 revenue of $122 million and EBITDA of -$109 million (-89% margin). FY+2 revenue is projected at $45 million with EBITDA of -$102 million (-227% margin). The near-term projection is anchored by no signed HPC leases and a shrinking Bitcoin base; FY+2 remains deeply negative because the model does not yet reflect converted HPC revenue.

Revenue & EBITDA Projections
REVENUE$229M$122M$45MFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN−$27M−$109M−$102M-227.0%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
REVENUE$229M$122M$45MFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN−$27M−$109M−$102M-227.0%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
Solid bars are reported actuals; outlined bars are model projections — not company guidance.
MetricFY2025Next FY (E)Following FY (E)
Revenue$229M$122M$45M
YoY Growth−46.8%−63.1%
EBITDA−$27M−$109M−$102M
EBITDA Margin-11.8%-89.0%-227.0%

Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs.

No formal revenue, margin, or EPS guidance was issued. Management's project-level guidance includes cash SG&A tracking about $100 million for 2026, Bitcoin hashrate declining from about 14 EH/s to roughly 5 EH/s by end-2026, and first HPC revenue in 2027. It did not explicitly reaffirm the Q1 target of signing three leases by year-end 2026.

What Could Go Right — and Wrong

What good looks like
  • A signed HPC lease at any near-term site, especially with investment-grade credit support, converts the development pipeline into contracted cash flow.
  • A portfolio-level deal materializes; management said multiple tenants want all three sites.
  • The roughly 2 GW Pennsylvania expansion applications convert into secured ESAs, extending the runway beyond the near-term sites.
  • The 96 MW Sherbrooke project receives provincial approval, consolidating three legacy Bitcoin PPAs into an HPC/AI PPA.
  • Moses Lake is energized and generates first HPC revenue in 2027 as planned.
What could go wrong
  • No lease is signed in 2026; the Q2 call did not explicitly reaffirm the year-end three-lease target.
  • Panther Creek or Moses Lake permitting slips further, pushing delivery beyond the 2027 ready-for-service window.
  • The first lease carries non-investment-grade credit support or modified gross terms, reducing financing efficiency and margin predictability.
  • Legacy Bitcoin losses widen while cash SG&A runs near $100 million, consuming liquidity before HPC revenue begins.
  • Expansion capacity remains unsecured if regulatory or utility changes interfere with the 2 GW Pennsylvania applications.
What’s Next

Looking Ahead

Over the next 12 months the watch items are permit completions, lease conversion, and expansion optionality. Moses Lake's go-vertical permit is expected later in Q3 2026, and a Pennsylvania expansion and Scrubgrass load-study update is expected as early as December 2026 or January 2027. First HPC revenue remains targeted for 2027, led by Moses Lake.

Catalysts
  • August 20, 2026Panther Creek DEP meeting — Described by management as routine; final environmental permits remain the gating item.
  • Later Q3 2026Moses Lake go-vertical permitting — Tests whether the first HPC site keeps its 2027 path.
  • December 2026 / January 2027Pennsylvania expansion update — Covers roughly 2 GW applications and the 750 MW Scrubgrass load study.
  • 2027First HPC revenue — Moses Lake expected first energized and revenue-generating HPC data center.
  • No date statedSherbrooke provincial approval — Only remaining approval for the 96 MW HPC/AI consolidation.
Numbers

Financials

Annual Summary

MetricFY2024FY2025TTMYoY
Revenue$193M$229M$199M+18.8%
Gross Margin-18.0%-19.2%-22.4%123bps
EBITDA$33M−$27M−$121M-182.1%
EBITDA Margin17.1%-11.8%-24.9%2,884bps
Net Income−$54M−$285M−$394M-427.0%
Free Cash Flow−$530M−$327M−$1.4B
Net Cash

Key Ratios (Trailing)

Valuation
  • P/E TTM
  • EV/EBITDA TTM
  • EV/Revenue TTM
  • Price/FCF TTM
Profitability
  • Gross Margin (TTM)-22.4%
  • EBITDA Margin (TTM)-24.9%
  • Net Margin (TTM)-197.6%
  • ROIC-20.6%
  • SBC / Revenue7.2%
Reference

The Company

KEEL develops, owns, and plans to operate data centers and energy infrastructure for HPC and AI workloads. It is the former Bitfarms Bitcoin mining business, redomiciled to the United States effective April 1, 2026, and rebranded as Keel Infrastructure Corp. The company's pitch is near-term, permitted power in constrained North American markets; management says new large-load interconnections in PJM, Québec, and Washington can take 4 to 10 years, and KEEL says it has already done that work at its sites.

The 10-K describes two segments: HPC Infrastructure, the intended growth business, and Bitcoin Mining, the legacy business managed for cash while assets are redeployed. KEEL relies on third-party utilities and construction partners including PPL, FirstEnergy, Hydro-Sherbrooke, Grant County PUD, Turner Construction, Corgan, and T5, and pre-purchased Vertiv modular equipment at Moses Lake. It sold its final Latin American site, Paso Pe, on April 21, 2026.

Business Segments

HPC Infrastructure
Growth segment; pre-revenue
Develops powered, permitted data center campuses designed for HPC/AI workloads, intended for long-term leases.
Growth driver: First HPC revenue expected in 2027, Moses Lake first.
Bitcoin Mining
Legacy segment; Q2 2026 revenue $30 million
Managed for cash while U.S. mining has been decommissioned and assets are redeployed to HPC.
Growth driver: Deliberately winding down

Competitive Landscape

KEEL competes with other Bitcoin miners converting to HPC and with established data center operators. Management's stated edge is time-to-power: it says it has already completed interconnection and permitting work that would otherwise take 4 to 10 years. The 10-K identifies competitive risks from pivoting Bitcoin miners and established data center operators.

  • Named in 10-K self-constructed peer group.
  • Hut 8
    Named in 10-K self-constructed peer group.
  • Named in 10-K self-constructed peer group.
  • Named in 10-K self-constructed peer group.
  • IREN
    Named in 10-K self-constructed peer group.
Names drawn from the 10-K self-constructed peer group; the provided sources do not include company-specific lease, revenue, counterparty, or financing metrics for these peers.

Supply Chain

KEEL sits between electric utilities and construction/equipment suppliers upstream, and hyperscale/AI tenants downstream. Its product is powered, permitted data center capacity, not compute itself.

Supplier
PPL
350 MW ESA for Panther Creek
Supplier
FirstEnergy
110 MW ESA for Sharon
Supplier
Vertiv
Modular infrastructure, transformers, backup generators
Supplier
Turner Construction
Construction partner
Supplier
Corgan
Architecture/engineering partner
Supplier
T5
Development/construction partner
Time-to-power advantage
KEEL
Developer/owner/operator of powered, permitted HPC data center campuses.
Foundry Pool
88% of FY2025 revenue
Sole mining pool operator in legacy Bitcoin segment.
Hyperscalers / AI companies / GPU clouds / enterprises
Described target HPC tenants; no signed leases disclosed.

Analysis updated Aug 12, 2026, reviewing Q1 FY2026. Prices delayed. Built with The Buildout’s published methodology. Not investment advice. No positions held. © The Buildout 2026.

More on KEEL: Earnings recap