QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
QuickLogic is a fabless semiconductor company that sells programmable logic — blocks of circuitry customers can reconfigure after a chip is built. Its main product is eFPGA hard IP, which lets other companies embed programmable logic inside their own ASICs and system-on-chips. It also sells radiation-hardened FPGAs for defense and aerospace, and legacy anti-fuse chips that have shipped to those customers for years. The company is shifting from a discrete-chip vendor toward an IP-licensing model, where it is paid for design work and licenses rather than only shipments. That shift is what ties it to the advanced-node and defense spending cycles.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M |
| Revenue Growth | −9.4% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | -31.3% |
| Net Cash | $17M |
| Earnings Beats | 2 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- Full-year 2026 revenue growth is guided to 70%–80%, with the low end raised even after two named contracts slipped to 2027.
- The U.S. government rad-hard contract carries an $89M total ceiling, with a $13M tranche on track for full recognition in FY2026.
- Non-GAAP gross margin was 46.8% in Q2 FY2026, above the 42% outlook and up from 31% a year earlier.
- Four Intel 18A eFPGA contracts with an unnamed DIB customer total nearly $2M, spanning two test chips, a 1M LUT feasibility study, and a very large 18A eFPGA core.
- The balance sheet showed $18.5M in cash against $1.2M of total debt at 2026-06-28, a net cash position.
What We’re Watching
- Two contracts — a seven-figure extension and a commercial Intel 18A ASIC design — were removed from the 2026 forecast and are now expected in 2027.
- Q3 FY2026 is guided flat at $5.5M ±10%, so Q4 must carry the full-year growth target, anchored on the government contract and on closing pending deals.
- Customer concentration is severe: Customer A was 70% of Q1 FY2026 revenue and 41% of receivables; two customers were 10%+ in Q2, with percentages deferred to the filing.
- The ATM program remains live and was not paused; a $5M line-of-credit drawdown was disclosed at the Q2 close.
The thesis is intact, but the timing risk is concentrated. The strategic position — leading-edge eFPGA IP, radiation-hardened parts, and a government vehicle larger than the current business — keeps improving, and the full-year growth range was narrowed upward at the low end. But two named contracts moved out of 2026 in a single quarter, the prior two quarters both missed on contract timing, and the year now depends heavily on Q4. The open question is whether Q4 delivers on the government tranche and the unclosed contracts, or whether the slip pattern repeats.
Earnings
For FY2026 Q2 (quarter ended 2026-06-28), QuickLogic reported revenue of $5.5M, up 48.7% year over year and 8.5% sequentially. Reported gross margin was 43.9%; non-GAAP gross margin was 46.8%, above the 42% outlook and up from 31% a year earlier. New product revenue rose 59.7% y/y to $4.7M, with mature product at $0.8M. Revenue landed at the low end of guidance because a seven-figure contract extension slipped out of 2026.
| Metric | Q2 FY2026 | Q1 FY2026 | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6M | $5M | $4M | +48.6% |
| Gross margin | 43.9% | 36.5% | 25.9% | +1800bps |
| EBITDA | −$0M | −$0M | −$1M | −83.3% |
| EPS | $-0.05 | $-0.13 | $-0.17 | −70.6% |
| New product revenue | $4.7M | $4.3M | n/a | +59.7% y/y |
| Mature product revenue | $0.8M | $0.8M | n/a | +6.9% y/y |
This delay is the sole reason why Q2 revenue was at the low end of our guidance range and we will forecast flat Q3 revenue.— Brian Faith, President and Chief Executive Officer, 2026-08-11
Management tone: Management kept confident language — the Q2 call said "2026 is on target to be a very successful year" — while naming the two revenue items removed from 2026 and tying the Q2 revenue miss and flat Q3 guide directly to them. The pattern across the two calls is an improving strategic story paired with slipping near-term timing. On harder questions, the team was direct on Q4 timing risk and Storefront scale, but repeatedly deferred program quantities, remaining government value, and Q2 customer percentages to filings or NDAs.
Management Guidance
For Q3 FY2026, management guides total revenue flat at the Q2 level, ±10%, split $4.7M new product and $0.8M mature; non-GAAP gross margin of ~47% ±5% based on anticipated mix; non-GAAP OpEx of ~$3.6M ±5%; and a non-GAAP net loss of ~$900K, or ~$0.05 per share. For the full year, guidance is 70%–80% revenue growth, ~51% non-GAAP gross margin, mature revenue flat at ~$3.3M, and non-GAAP OpEx of $13.7M–$13.9M, with non-GAAP profitability and positive cash flow modeled for H2 2026. Management says the Q3 guide is "based on backlog and customer forecast" and that the open risk is business-side contract closure, not engineering.
Trajectory
Revenue has stepped higher across the last two quarters — $3.7M in Q4 FY2025, then $5.1M in Q1 FY2026 and $5.5M in Q2 FY2026 — but each step was gated by contract closure rather than demand. The code-computed signals read the revenue trajectory as stable, with gross, operating, and EBITDA margins all expanding over the trailing period. Reported gross margin moved from negative in Q3 FY2025 to 36.5% in Q1 FY2026 and 43.9% in Q2 FY2026. The catch is composition: the full-year gross-margin guide was cut to ~51% from ~57% because the mix carrying the second half is lower-margin than the Storefront device business the company expects in 2027.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $24.1M with EBITDA of $1M (6.2% margin), and FY+2 revenue of $34.0M with EBITDA of $6M (16.9% margin). The near term is anchored on government work, existing IP contracts, and closing pending deals; FY+2 leans on Storefront device revenue and chiplet programs the company now frames as 2027-weighted. The five model runs show a 16% spread on FY+2 revenue, with a low of $32M and a high of $38M.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14M | $24M | $34M |
| YoY Growth | — | +75.9% | +41.1% |
| EBITDA | −$6M | $1M | $6M |
| EBITDA Margin | -44.5% | 6.2% | 16.9% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 21.0% above analyst consensus.
For Q3 FY2026, management guides total revenue flat at the Q2 level, ±10%, split $4.7M new product and $0.8M mature; non-GAAP gross margin of ~47% ±5% based on anticipated mix; non-GAAP OpEx of ~$3.6M ±5%; and a non-GAAP net loss of ~$900K, or ~$0.05 per share. For the full year, guidance is 70%–80% revenue growth, ~51% non-GAAP gross margin, mature revenue flat at ~$3.3M, and non-GAAP OpEx of $13.7M–$13.9M, with non-GAAP profitability and positive cash flow modeled for H2 2026. Management says the Q3 guide is "based on backlog and customer forecast" and that the open risk is business-side contract closure, not engineering.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- Q4 FY2026 delivers the step-up, with the next U.S. government tranche awarded and pending contracts closed.
- The second-ever eFPGA IP architectural license signs in late 2026, validating a higher-value licensing model.
- Storefront device revenue arrives in 2027 at the "mid to high 60%" gross margin management describes, reversing the mix drag.
- The follow-on 1M LUT Intel 18A-P contract is awarded on schedule in Q4 2026, confirming the port cost is low.
- Rad-Hard evaluations convert to signed programs, showing the government vehicle is a franchise rather than a single tranche.
- Q4 FY2026 misses because a contract does not close or the next government tranche slips, breaking the 70%–80% full-year guide.
- The two contracts pushed to 2027 turn out to be lost rather than deferred, thinning the forward pipeline.
- Gross margin settles well below the ~51% full-year guide as second-half mix or supplier cost pass-through bites.
- The Intel 18A-P transition stalls in the customer ecosystem, pushing advanced-node revenue out again.
- The ATM stays live while revenue slips, adding dilution against a still-unprofitable P&L.
Looking Ahead
Over the next year the story turns on whether the company can convert its pipeline on schedule. Q4 FY2026 is the pivot: management models non-GAAP profitability and positive cash flow in H2 2026 and a Q4 step-up anchored on the U.S. government contract and unclosed deals. Beyond that, the 2027 path rests on events just getting under way — a second architectural license targeted for late 2026, a follow-on Intel 18A-P contract, a 12LP evaluation kit and two more tape-outs, and initial Storefront and chiplet revenue. Each is dated, and each has slipped before.
- Q4 2026Follow-on 18A-P contract — 1M LUT contract targeted for Q4; tests the low-cost port claim.
- Q4 202612LP eval kit release — Eval kit shipping enables hardware evaluations for Storefront.
- Late 2026Two more MPW tape-outs — One should yield devices for initial Storefront production orders.
- Late 2026Second architectural license — Signing would validate the higher-value IP licensing model.
- End of 2026Next government tranche — Expected before year-end; supports Q4 revenue recognition.
- 2027Initial Storefront demand — First device orders; management sizes it at single-digit millions.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20M | $14M | $16M | -30.8% |
| Gross Margin | 59.3% | 16.0% | 27.5% | 4,332bps |
| EBITDA | $0M | −$6M | −$5M | -6200.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 0.5% | -44.5% | -31.3% | 4,503bps |
| Net Income | −$4M | −$15M | −$13M | -282.1% |
| Free Cash Flow | −$6M | −$7M | −$1M | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)27.5%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)-31.3%
- Net Margin (TTM)-80.4%
- ROIC-63.7%
- SBC / Revenue15.3%
The Company
QuickLogic develops programmable logic technology — chips and intellectual property that customers can reconfigure after manufacturing. Its core product is eFPGA hard IP, which lets a semiconductor company embed a block of programmable logic inside its own ASIC or system-on-chip. It also sells discrete FPGAs, including radiation-hardened parts under the RadPro brand for defense and aerospace, and legacy anti-fuse chips that have shipped to those customers for decades. The business is reported in two revenue lines: a new-product line carrying eFPGA IP, rad-hard, and advanced-node programs, and a mature-product line of anti-fuse devices.
QuickLogic is fabless and asset-light. It owns no fabs and outsources all manufacturing — wafer fabrication to foundries, and packaging and final test to assembly houses. Its principal facility is a roughly 24,164 sq ft office in San Jose, California that houses administration, sales, marketing, R&D, and final testing; it keeps flexible sales offices in London and Taipei. Because each hardware product is fabricated, assembled, and programmed by a single supplier, the company carries single-source risk across its products. It reports a single reportable business segment.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
QuickLogic competes in programmable logic against much larger vendors. Its own 10-K lists Lattice Semiconductor, Microchip Technology, Advanced Micro Devices (Xilinx), and Intel (Altera brand) as competitors in discrete FPGAs. In the advanced-node IP niche, the record shows a narrower position: four Intel 18A eFPGA contracts with an unnamed DIB customer totaling nearly $2M, with management saying the majority of design activity has since shifted to Intel 18A-P. The record also shows an overlap — Intel appears at once as a discrete-FPGA competitor and as the foundry process partner on 18A/18A-P. Whether that advanced-node position carries to 18A-P, where design activity has moved, is not disclosed.
- Lattice SemiconductorNamed in filings; not discussed.
- Microchip Technology (Microsemi)Named in filings; not discussed.
- Advanced Micro Devices (Xilinx)Named in filings; not discussed.
- Intel (Altera)Listed in the 10-K as a discrete-FPGA competitor; also the foundry process partner named in QuickLogic's Intel 18A/18A-P eFPGA work.
Supply Chain
QuickLogic is fabless and sits upstream in the semiconductor chain, selling programmable logic IP and specialty chips into defense, aerospace, and advanced-node ASIC markets. It owns no factories and relies on a small set of foundries and assembly houses, with each hardware product made by a single supplier.
Related companies
See all Silicon Design companies → · How this layer works: Chapter 1, The Chip →
More on QUIK: Earnings recap