Earnings/Recap
MLMMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.

Earnings Recap — Q2 FY2026

CY Q3 2026 · Reported July 30, 2026 · Beat 4 of last 7 quarters

The Buildout is a website built on agentic AI tools, currently in beta, and could have factual errors.

Go to the full Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. company page →
What this means for the buildout

Martin Marietta's results underscore the strength of the AI infrastructure buildout, with heavy nonresidential demand driven by data centers, power generation, and manufacturing. The company's proximity advantage—70% of planned data center and manufacturing square footage within 55 miles of its facilities—positions it to benefit from continued secular growth. The pending LNA acquisition adds lime products essential for steel and data center construction, further aligning with the buildout theme.

Results vs consensus
EstimateActualvs est
Revenue$1.87B$1.95B+4.1%beat
EPS$4.76$5.00+5.0%beat
What was said

Martin Marietta delivered record second quarter revenues and adjusted EBITDA, with aggregates revenue up 16% to $1.5B and Specialties revenue up to $152M. Organic aggregates shipments grew 2.3% and organic mix-adjusted pricing rose 3.7%, while organic COGS per ton increased only 2.1% ex-freight. Reported aggregates gross profit of $418M was impacted by a $52M noncash inventory step-up charge and higher DD&A; adjusted cash gross profit was up 15% year-over-year. The company completed the NFM acquisition in May and announced the transformational LNA combination in June, while completing the enterprise-wide rollout of Precise IQ quoting tool.

Key metrics
Record Q2 Revenue
$1.947B
Record second quarter revenues, up 16% year-over-year, driven by infrastructure and heavy nonresidential demand plus acquisitions.
Record Q2 Adjusted EBITDA
$583M
Record second quarter adjusted EBITDA; first half 2026 adjusted EBITDA exceeded $1 billion, a new record.
Aggregates Organic Shipments
+2.3%
Fourth consecutive quarter of organic volume growth; total shipments up 17% to 61.6M tons including Quikrete and partial NFM.
Organic Mix-Adjusted Pricing
+3.7%
Organic ASP up 3.7% after adjusting for geographic mix; headline ASP down 2% due to acquisition and geo mix.
Organic COGS per Ton
+2.1%
Excluding pass-through external freight; controllable cost growth notably below the implied 3% guidance, with flat COGS ex-energy.
Management outlook

Management raised full-year revenue guidance to $7.2–7.4 billion (up $140M at midpoint) while reaffirming adjusted EBITDA guidance of $2.36–2.5 billion, reflecting strong first-half performance and NFM contributions partially offset by elevated energy costs. They expect organic volumes to trend toward the high end and pricing toward the low end of original guidance, with strong realization of midyear increases in Quikrete and New Frontier markets. The pending LNA combination is expected to close in H2 2026, with guidance to be updated post-close; management expects to delever to target range within 24 months. They identified ~$350M of run-rate pretax cash flow improvements (OpEx, working capital, sustaining CapEx) and expect to exit 2027 at that level, likely revising upward. Infrastructure demand remains durable with a short-term CR expected but no material impact; heavy nonresidential strength driven by data centers, power, and manufacturing, with 70% of planned data center and manufacturing square footage within 55 miles of a Martin Marietta facility.

From the call

And so if we're looking at reported aggregates cash gross profit, and we think about a bridge, I mean, here's the way I rack it up in my mind. $418 million reported, if we come back and adjust for the fair market value inventory adjustment, that's $52 million. Then if we come back and look at the adjusted gross profit at that number, you're at $470 million. That's 9% over prior year. And then equally, if we come back and take a look at the noncash DD&A of $166 million, that gets us to adjusted cash gross profit of $636 million and that's up 15% year-over-year.

on Aggregates gross profit bridge

I think the primary thing that we're doing is we're simply looking at the energy markets, and we're saying, let's not bet on that getting better in the second half of the year. And so I think we're taking a very conservative view of the way that we're going to approach cost for the rest of the year.

on Cost outlook

So when we think about that geography and think about their network of 20 quarries and production facilities and then 45 distribution terminals and how that's going to click in to what we've had historically, we think that's a great opportunity.

on LNA acquisition rationale

What analysts asked

Ward, I wanted to focus on your organic aggregates business. If you strip out deals, how is the underlying aggregates business performing versus your expectations?

Ward highlighted strong organic performance: volumes up 2.3% (fourth consecutive quarter of growth), mix-adjusted pricing up 3.7%, and COGS up only 2.1% ex-freight. He noted that ex-energy, COGS would have been flat. He walked through the bridge to adjusted cash gross profit of $636M, up 15% year-over-year, emphasizing the underlying strength beyond GAAP noise.

Next up in queue and focus is acquisitions and more specifically with Lhoist, you now are in the midst of -- you've made the announcement -- you've already had a call that gave some details at the time of closing of the announcement of the acquisition. But where we sit today, what are you seeing as the risk and opportunities for this acquisition.

Ward outlined opportunities: LNA is the leading U.S. producer of dolomitic and high-calcium lime with a Sun Belt footprint, mission-critical products, and low customer cost share (1-4%). He cited Woodville's resilient performance as evidence of lime's durability. Risks are manageable given proven integration track record, complementary businesses, and ability to delever within 24 months. He confirmed the deal is 'not a whole lot different from Martin's core strategy.'

So my question is on the updated guidance for the year. You're taking the revenue guide up $140 million at the midpoint, reiterating the EBITDA range. So maybe if you could discuss some of the puts and takes here.

Ward and Michael explained that EBITDA contributions from NFM will largely offset elevated diesel costs. Volumes are trending toward the high end (YTD organic +4.3%), pricing toward the low end due to mix. Midyear increases are expected to realize strongly in Quikrete and NFM markets, and the Specialties business should continue at a ~$50M quarterly gross profit run rate. They remain confident in the 3% COGS per ton guide.

Potential supply chain impact
VMCMartin Marietta's strong organic volume and pricing performance, along with its cost discipline, could signal similar trends for Vulcan Materials, though geographic mix differences may affect comparability.
CRHCRH, as a major aggregates producer, may see similar demand tailwinds from infrastructure and data center construction, but its broader geographic and product diversification could lead to different results.
KNFKnife River, with a focus on aggregates and construction materials, could benefit from the same infrastructure and heavy nonresidential demand trends, though its regional footprint may differ.
ACAArcosa's aggregates and construction products segments may experience similar demand dynamics, but its exposure to other end markets like transportation could provide a different mix.
AMRZAmrize, as a smaller aggregates producer, may be impacted by the same market trends but could face different competitive pressures given its scale.
TTAMTitan America, with operations in the Southeast, could see similar infrastructure and data center demand, though its product mix and geographic focus may lead to different performance.