Keysight Technologies, Inc. (KEYS) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
Keysight makes design and test solutions used across computing, communications, and electronics. Its instruments, software, and emulation systems validate chips, optical transceivers, switches, racks, and clusters before they ship at volume, placing the company in the validation layer of AI infrastructure. Customers use Keysight from pre-silicon design through component validation, system-level emulation, and high-value manufacturing.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.6B |
| Revenue Growth | +25.5% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | 24.8% |
| Net Debt | $141M |
| Earnings Beats | 7 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- Management sized the AI business at $500M–$600M in H1 FY2026, almost in line with all of FY2025, and said the AI-related business surpassed all of 2025.
- Q3 orders were $2.091B, up 56% reported and 52% core; management expects a third above $2B in Q4.
- Operating margin was 33.2%, up 820 bps and above the 31%–32% long-term target; core operating margin was 34.7% with 66% incremental leverage.
- Commercial Communications revenue was $1.006B, up 56%; wireline orders more than doubled year over year and wireline revenue exceeded wireless for the first time.
- Acquisition integration is largely complete one quarter ahead of schedule; cost synergies are now 80%–90% of $100M exiting FY2026, with about $50M incremental into FY2027.
What We’re Watching
- Supply chain is now the stated governor of near-term revenue; management says the supply environment is less flexible than a year ago and likely nonlinear for several quarters.
- The AI business is scoped 'largely in the wireline segment'; EISG AI-attributed semiconductor and general-electronics demand is not reconciled to that figure, and no definition has been published.
- Management says one-time tariff impacts artificially pulled up FY2026 profitability and will not repeat, making the FY2027 margin comparison harder.
- EISG operating margin declined sequentially to 31.0% from 33.1%; software and services mix fell to about 33% of revenue and ARR to 24%, from 36% and 27% in Q2.
The thesis is strengthening. Q3 extended the Q2 materiality read with record orders, record revenue, the wireline-above-wireless crossover, and margin above the company's own long-term target. The open question is whether supply flexibility arrives before it caps FY2027 revenue conversion, and whether management quantifies the broader AI-linked demand it describes outside the wireline-scoped AI business figure.
Earnings Beat
Keysight reported fiscal Q3 2026 revenue of $1.846B, up 36% reported and 31% core, with gross margin of 65.9% on reported figures and operating margin of 33.2%. EPS was $3.07, up 79% year over year, and orders were $2.091B, up 56%, a second straight $2B+ quarter. Management said results exceeded the high end of its revenue and EPS guidance.
| Metric | Q3 FY2026 | Q2 FY2026 | Q3 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.7B | $1.4B | +36.5% |
| Gross margin | 65.9% | 68.6% | 61.7% | +420bps |
| EBITDA | $567M | $489M | $300M | +89.0% |
| EPS | $2.29 | $2.02 | $1.10 | +107.9% |
| Orders | $2.091B | $2.051B | n/a | +56% reported |
| Free cash flow | $403M | $472M | $381M | +6% |
The supply environment is less flexible today than … a year ago.— Satish Dhanasekaran, President & CEO, August 18, 2026
Management tone: On the Q3 call, demand language strengthened — records, all-time-high pipeline, demand 'far exceeding' supply — while supply language became more constrained: 'less flexible today' and 'governor of near-term revenue.' Management also volunteered that one-time tariff benefits flattered FY2026 profitability and would not repeat.
Management Guidance
Management guided Q4 FY2026 revenue of $1.930B–$1.950B and EPS of $3.34–$3.40, and FY2026 revenue growth of 32% with EPS growth of approximately 60% at the midpoint. It reaffirmed 'upper 60s percent' gross margin as sustainable and a 40% long-term incremental-margin framework, while saying it expects to outperform that framework in FY2027 adjusted for non-repeating tariffs. Cost synergies are now expected at 80%–90% of $100M on a run-rate basis exiting FY2026, with roughly $50M incremental into FY2027. Management said it would give Q1 FY2027 guidance at the Q4 report.
Trajectory
Revenue stepped from $1.600B in Q1 FY2026 to $1.717B in Q2 and $1.846B in Q3. EBITDA margin on reported figures rose from 17.9% to 28.5% to 30.7%. Management ties the move to AI infrastructure scaling, wireline orders more than doubling year over year, and record semiconductor test demand. The near-term ceiling is supply: management says supply chain is the governor of near-term revenue.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $8,740M and EBITDA of $2,753M, a 31.5% margin. For FY+2 it projects revenue of $10,371M and EBITDA of $3,371M, a 32.5% margin. The near-term anchors are AI infrastructure demand, wireline orders above $2B per quarter, and the supply constraint as the main swing factor. The FY+2 step-up depends on supply flexibility arriving, the product refresh contributing, and 6G and defense activity building.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $8.7B | $10.4B |
| YoY Growth | — | +62.6% | +18.7% |
| EBITDA | $1.2B | $2.8B | $3.4B |
| EBITDA Margin | 21.4% | 31.5% | 32.5% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 15.1% above analyst consensus.
Management guided Q4 FY2026 revenue of $1.930B–$1.950B and EPS of $3.34–$3.40, and FY2026 revenue growth of 32% with EPS growth of approximately 60% at the midpoint. It reaffirmed 'upper 60s percent' gross margin as sustainable and a 40% long-term incremental-margin framework, while saying it expects to outperform that framework in FY2027 adjusted for non-repeating tariffs. Cost synergies are now expected at 80%–90% of $100M on a run-rate basis exiting FY2026, with roughly $50M incremental into FY2027. Management said it would give Q1 FY2027 guidance at the Q4 report.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- Supply deconstrains faster than planned, allowing the $2B+ order pace to convert to revenue beyond the Q4 guide.
- The AI business definition broadens to include EISG semiconductor and general-electronics demand, lifting visible AI revenue.
- Wireline stays above wireless and R&D content holds while production ramps, supporting mix and margins.
- Cost synergies reach the top of the 80%–90% range and the roughly $50M incremental layer lands in FY2027.
- 6G funded development converts to named wins ahead of the March 2029 standard, and the product refresh contributes NPI revenue.
- Supply stays the governor for several quarters or into 2028, capping revenue conversion while orders keep building.
- Hyperscaler capex digests; the direct cohort is roughly 10% of business but has broad downstream influence, hitting wireline first.
- The tariff lift rolls off and FY2027 margins disappoint against 'upper 60s' gross margin and the 40% incremental framework.
- Customer consolidation in communications or large-order contractual liabilities hurts revenue or gross margin.
- Competitive share loss during the supply-constrained window, continued EISG margin mix pressure, or further ADG deceleration.
Looking Ahead
Over the next 12 months, the key test is the Q4 FY2026 report expected in Nov 2026, when management is expected to report against $1.930B–$1.950B revenue and $3.34–$3.40 EPS and give Q1 FY2027 guidance. Investors watch whether supply eases, whether wireline stays above wireless, and whether the AI business is resized or redefined. 6G activity remains funded development ahead of the first standard targeted for March 2029.
- Sep 11, 2026Investor fireside chat — Satish Dhanasekaran and Neil Dougherty participate.
- Nov 2026 (expected)Q4 FY2026 report — Tests Q4 guide, Q1 FY2027 guidance, and synergy run-rate.
- Next several quartersSupply deconstraining — Watch whether supply shifts from governor to easing.
- March 20296G first standard — Tests funded development conversion ahead of standard.
- Multi-quarter / multi-yearProduct refresh rollout — Biggest core RF/microwave and high-speed digital refresh.
- Through 2030AI capacity runway — Management cites a few hundred gigawatts of capacity through 2030.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.0B | $5.4B | $6.6B | +8.0% |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 62.1% | 64.7% | 80bps |
| EBITDA | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.6B | +4.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 22.2% | 21.4% | 24.8% | 74bps |
| Net Income | $614M | $846M | $1.3B | +37.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | $898M | $1.4B | $1.5B | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)64.7%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)24.8%
- Net Margin (TTM)19.1%
- ROIC15.7%
- FCF Conversion89.9%
- SBC / Revenue3.3%
The Company
Keysight makes design and test solutions for computing, communications, and electronics. Its instruments, software, and emulation systems are used to design, characterize, validate, and production-test chips, optical transceivers, network gear, and data-center racks and clusters. Revenue is primarily from R&D applications, and customers are in over 100 countries across communications, aerospace/defense, automotive, energy, industrial, and semiconductor end markets.
The company reports in two segments, CSG and EISG. Manufacturing is centered in Penang, Malaysia, described in the 10-K as its largest facility for final assembly, tuning, calibration, and test, with significant U.S. manufacturing in California and Colorado and technology centers in Santa Rosa, Colorado Springs, and Boeblingen. Keysight says it is vertically integrated for a significant portion of its highly specialized chips and assemblies, and management says memory is a small portion of its bill of materials.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
Keysight competes across test and measurement against a broad set of named companies, including Rohde & Schwarz, Anritsu, Advantest, Teledyne, Viavi, Fortive/Tektronix, Teradyne, Ametek, Emerson/NI PXI, Ralliant, Cadence, Silvaco, Arista, NetScout, McGrath RentCorp, and RADCOM. The source material says several competitor filings name Keysight, and Keysight's own 10-K warns that custom parts are 'not readily available from alternate suppliers.' The evidence says Keysight's differentiation is strongest where portfolio breadth matters, but competitors are also inflecting.
- Rohde & SchwarzNamed in Keysight's competitor map and Ralliant's filing as a main T&M competitor.
- ViaviNamed as a competitor in network test, optical field/transport, and high-speed Ethernet; Viavi's filing names Keysight among its NSE competitors.
- TeradyneNamed as a competitor in semiconductor ATE and wireless test; Teradyne's filing names Keysight among its Product Test competitors.
- RalliantRalliant's filing says its Test and Measurement segment main competitors include Keysight, Rohde & Schwarz, Ametek, and Teledyne.
- AristaArista's filing says its DANZ Monitoring Fabric competes with Keysight in the network packet broker market.
Supply Chain
Keysight sits in the validation layer of the AI build-out, supplying test and measurement systems to chip, optical, networking, and hyperscaler customers. Supplier identities come mainly from an automation-sourced relationship map, not the 10-K, and no neighbor named Keysight.
More on KEYS: Earnings recap