Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
Analog Devices sells the analog content that surrounds compute — the chips that sense, convert, condition, control and power electronic systems. In AI data centers that means the optical control path inside transceivers, the power-conversion chain from the grid down to the processor package, and analog and mixed-signal content in automated test equipment. It does not sell compute or networking silicon. Management describes industrial as its most profitable business, with 15- to 20-year average product life cycles, and describes its edge as the highest average selling price in the industry and designs that it says are effectively not substituted once designed in.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.9B |
| Revenue Growth | +33.6% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | 49.7% |
| Net Debt | $6.8B |
| Earnings Beats | 7 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- Data center reached 80% of communications in Q3 FY26 and grew more than 100% year over year in both optical and power.
- EPS was a record $3.45, up 68% year over year and at the high end of guidance.
- Trailing-twelve-month free cash flow was a record $4.9B, or 36% of revenue, with net leverage of 0.9 after the $1.5B cash Empower acquisition.
- Management says the company has delivered above-seasonal growth for nine straight quarters and is guiding to a 10th.
- Management says its 2030 addressable market across data center and energy has more than doubled from a year ago, and extends the data center growth runway to at least 2030.
What We’re Watching
- Gross margin is guided to ~74% with no remaining utilization leverage; management says more cost increases are coming and Q1 carries a seasonal shutdown drag.
- Lead times have started to extend, and management is now scenario-planning whether it needs capacity beyond its current plans.
- Consumer revenue growth slowed from +23% year over year in Q2 FY26 to +6% in Q3 FY26, which management links to memory-driven challenges.
- One distributor was 24% of FY2025 revenue; the two disclosed distributors together were about 37%.
The thesis looks stronger on this evidence: revenue, margins and the guided next quarter all stepped up, and management re-based both its view of the analog market and its own AI opportunity. The main check is that the multi-year claims rest on design wins, pipeline and bookings momentum rather than booked numbers — management declined to put a figure on FY27 or on 2027 communications growth — while a large part of current growth comes from a cyclical recovery it describes as unfinished. The open question is whether that recovery is a base still to be recovered or a comparison that will not repeat.
Earnings Beat
Revenue was $4.02B in FY26 Q3, above the high end of guidance, up 11% sequentially and 40% year over year — the first $4B quarter in company history. Gross margin was 67.3% on an as-reported basis. The standout was data center, which reached 80% of communications and grew more than 100% year over year in both optical and power.
| Metric | Q3 FY2026 | Q2 FY2026 | Q3 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.0B | $3.6B | $2.9B | +39.6% |
| Gross margin | 67.3% | 67.3% | 62.1% | +520bps |
| EBITDA | $2.1B | $1.9B | $1.3B | +61.4% |
| EPS | $2.73 | $2.40 | $1.04 | +161.8% |
| Data center share of communications | 80% | more than 75% | n/a | — |
| Data center y/y growth (optical and power) | more than 100% | more than 90% | n/a | — |
We have talked about this AI exposure as ATE plus our data center business combined. Those are 20% of ADI.— Richard C. Puccio Jr., CFO, 2026-08-19
Management tone: Management's tone stayed confident and expansive, and shifted toward structure rather than the quarter: it escalated data center disclosure, raised the gross margin guide to ~74%, and re-based its view of analog industry growth from a prior 5% to 7% model to a possible double-digit compound. The supply and cost posture tightened at the same time. A quarter earlier management described general calmness among customers and lead times in good shape; on the Q3 call it said lead times have started to extend and that it is scenario-planning capacity. Management volunteered that the full extent of its announced price action is not captured in Q4, and repeated that there is little room for more margin accretion from utilization.
Management Guidance
For Q4 FY26 management guided revenue of $4.3B ±$100M, operating margin of 52% ±100bps, EPS of $3.86 ±$0.15, gross margin of ~74% (an increase of about 150 bps), non-operating expenses of ~$80M and a tax rate of 12% to 14%. Sequentially it guided industrial up high single digits, communications leading with data center up ~10%, consumer up high single digits and automotive up low single digits. Medium term, management says gross margin should hang in at the Q4 exit level 'as long as we maintain the revenue and mix that we expect.' It calls for a brisk growth year in 2027 without giving a number, targets OCS revenue roughly doubling this year with similar growth in 2027, expects the energy business to double by the end of the decade, and puts Maxim synergies at ~$700M in FY26 and $1B+ in 2027. FY26 capital expenditure is expected within 4% to 6% of revenue.
Trajectory
Revenue has risen in each of the last four reported quarters, from $3,076.1M in FY25 Q4 to $3,160.3M, then $3,623.5M, then $4,021.9M in FY26 Q3. EBITDA margin (operating income plus D&A as reported) went from 46.8% in FY25 Q4 to 52.4% in FY26 Q3, and gross margin on the same reported basis went from 63.1% to 67.3%. The drivers management names are broad industrial growth — all industrial businesses up year over year, led by automated test equipment, electronic test and measurement, aerospace and defense, and automation — an automotive cycle that moved from +2% to +16% year over year, and data center growing more than 100%. Pricing adds, in management's words, a couple of points to FY26 growth. The Q4 revenue guide implies roughly 7% sequential growth.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $18,425.0M with EBITDA of $9,996M, a 54.25% margin, and FY+2 revenue of $21,202.0M with EBITDA of $11,608M, a 54.75% margin. The near term is anchored by the Q4 FY26 guidance and by data center growth management says is running above 100% year over year. FY+2 depends on whether data center sustains the runway management describes through at least 2030, whether the industrial recovery continues, and whether Empower's vertical power products turn design-ins into revenue.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.0B | $18.4B | $21.2B |
| YoY Growth | — | +67.2% | +15.1% |
| EBITDA | $4.9B | $10.0B | $11.6B |
| EBITDA Margin | 44.8% | 54.2% | 54.8% |
Projections are the median of 4 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 14.1% above analyst consensus.
For Q4 FY26 management guided revenue of $4.3B ±$100M, operating margin of 52% ±100bps, EPS of $3.86 ±$0.15, gross margin of ~74% (an increase of about 150 bps), non-operating expenses of ~$80M and a tax rate of 12% to 14%. Sequentially it guided industrial up high single digits, communications leading with data center up ~10%, consumer up high single digits and automotive up low single digits. Medium term, management says gross margin should hang in at the Q4 exit level 'as long as we maintain the revenue and mix that we expect.' It calls for a brisk growth year in 2027 without giving a number, targets OCS revenue roughly doubling this year with similar growth in 2027, expects the energy business to double by the end of the decade, and puts Maxim synergies at ~$700M in FY26 and $1B+ in 2027. FY26 capital expenditure is expected within 4% to 6% of revenue.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- Data center keeps growing above 100% year over year in optical and power, moving it from roughly 13% of revenue toward a larger share of the mix.
- The broad industrial recovery continues: management says most of its business is still shipping below historical consumption levels and that it has not seen restocking yet.
- Gross margin holds near the ~74% Q4 exit level, with industrial mix moving above 49% as the stated upside lever.
- The announced price action flows through in Q1 FY27 on top of the Q4 guide without a matching cost step.
- Empower and Alif design-ins convert to revenue; management points to 2027 for the surge in Empower demand.
- AI capital spending slows, which management itself lists as a risk, and communications — now 80% data center — stops compounding.
- Gross margin plateaus at ~74% because utilization leverage is exhausted while inflation persists and Q1 carries a seasonal shutdown drag.
- The recovery proves to be a comparison rather than a base, ending the run of above-seasonal quarters and leaving revenue growth closer to the old analog model.
- Supply tightens further: more than half of wafer requirements come from third-party foundries including TSMC, and lead times are already extending.
- Competitors add capacity at scale across the analog and power landscape, pressuring sockets and pricing over time.
Looking Ahead
The next twelve months turn on whether the guided step-up holds and whether the AI-exposed part of the business keeps compounding. The Q4 FY26 print tests the revenue and ~74% gross margin guide along with the segment directions management gave; Q1 FY27 tests whether the announced price action lifts gross margin above the Q4 exit level against a seasonal shutdown. Beyond that, the packet's milestones are the Empower revenue ramp and Maxim synergies in 2027, the closing of the Alif acquisition with no timing given, and management's stated targets of roughly doubling OCS revenue and doubling the energy business by the end of the decade.
- Q4 FY26Q4 FY26 results — Tests the revenue guide and the ~74% gross margin target.
- Q1 FY27Full price action lands — Announced price increases not fully captured in Q4 flow through.
- FY27Maxim synergies $1B+ — FY26 marker is ~$700M; the FY27 target is $1B+.
- 2027Empower revenue ramp — Vertical power design-ins convert; promise not refreshed after close.
- By end of decadeEnergy business doubles — Management targets doubling a business of $500M plus.
- No timing givenAlif acquisition close — No terms, close date or regulatory timeline disclosed.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.4B | $11.0B | $13.9B | +16.9% |
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 61.3% | 65.8% | +427bps |
| EBITDA | $4.1B | $4.9B | $6.9B | +19.2% |
| EBITDA Margin | 43.9% | 44.8% | 49.7% | +87bps |
| Net Income | $1.6B | $2.3B | $4.1B | +38.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | $3.1B | $4.3B | $4.9B | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)65.8%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)49.7%
- Net Margin (TTM)29.8%
- ROIC9.7%
- FCF Conversion71.5%
- SBC / Revenue2.5%
The Company
Analog Devices designs, manufactures, tests and markets integrated circuits, software and subsystems built on high-performance analog, mixed-signal and digital signal processing technology. Its portfolio spans data converters, amplifiers, power management, radio-frequency ICs, edge processors and sensors. That analog content is what senses, converts, conditions, controls and powers electronic systems, which places ADI alongside the compute rather than inside it — the optical control path, the power-conversion chain and the test content that AI infrastructure needs.
ADI runs a hybrid manufacturing network of internal fabs plus external foundry and back-end partners. Owned wafer fabs are in Wilmington, Massachusetts; Limerick, Ireland; and Beaverton, Oregon, with probe, test and assembly concentrated in Cavite in the Philippines, Chonburi in Thailand, Penang in Malaysia and Chelmsford, Massachusetts. More than half of its wafer requirements come from third-party foundries, including TSMC, and fiscal 2026 capital expenditure is expected within 4% to 6% of revenue. Management says internal capacity has been more than doubled versus pre-COVID.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
Management frames ADI's position around price and stickiness rather than scale alone: the highest average selling price in the industry by its account, roughly 4 to 5 times the industry average, and designs it says are effectively not substituted once designed in. The competitive set is broad — several analog and power rivals name ADI in their own filings, and the relationship graph adds others competing in the same data center power and optical content. Management describes this cycle as different from the late-1990s buildout, citing far greater portfolio breadth and depth, more value per bit and per watt, and what it calls a gravity field of AI pulling everything with it.
- Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)Names ADI among its primary competitors; raised its enterprise data growth floor from 50% to about 85% year over year and its capacity goal from $4B to $6B.
- ON Semiconductor (ON)Names ADI a competitor in its AMG segment. Reports AI data center revenue up 30% sequentially to about $500M in 2026 and energy-storage share approaching about 60%.
- Its filing names ADI among its primary competitors. Reports data center growth above 60% for FY26 and book-to-bill of 1.5:1.
- NXP Semiconductors (NXPI)Names ADI among its key public competitors. Sizes its own data center revenue going from about $200M in 2025 to more than $500M in 2026, control plane only.
- Texas Instruments (TXN)Named in filings; not discussed.
Supply Chain
ADI sits upstream of AI data centers, supplying analog control, power-conversion and grid-to-chip content. More than half its wafers come from third-party foundries including TSMC, and its largest disclosed counterparty is a distributor at 24% of FY2025 revenue. No peer transcript in the packet names ADI directly.
Related companies
See all Silicon Design companies → · How this layer works: Chapter 1, The Chip →
More on ADI: Earnings recap