Cameco Corporation (CCJ) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure

——Mkt cap — · 52-wk —–— · YTD — · delayed
Updated Sep 22, 2026Q2 FY2026 reviewed
Cameco mines uranium and supplies nuclear fuel-cycle products to reactors that AI-driven electricity demand makes more valuable.
230M lbs contracted
Long-term contract book of 230 million pounds as of end-2025.
91-reactor pipeline
Westinghouse AP1000 funnel disclosed in the Q2 FY2026 MD&A.
Uranium price mid-90s
Long-term price seen on its way to 3 digits, before replacement-rate demand.
3 disruptions in 2026
Flood halted McArthur/Key Lake; Cigar Lake suspended post-quarter.
The Buildout Takeaway
Nearly all of Cameco's revenue is nuclear fuel-cycle, so its AI link runs through reactor fleet economics rather than direct sales, and management never names AI on its calls. The growth story is Westinghouse's reactor pipeline and two U.S. government financing tracks, but those projects run roughly 9 to 11 years.
19 analysts·13 Buy4 Hold2 Sell
Coverage is thin — only 5 price estimates, so no target is shown

FY2026: uranium production 19.5-21.5M lbs · fuel services 13-14M kgU · uranium deliveries 29-32M lbs at CAD 85-89/lb · Westinghouse adjusted EBITDA USD 370-430M (Cameco share).
Important: The Buildout is a data analytics platform. Content is generated by algorithms and AI agents using public filings, earnings transcripts, and market data. This is not personalized investment advice.
Our View

The Verdict

Cameco is an integrated nuclear fuel-cycle company. It mines uranium, refines and converts it, manufactures fuel bundles for heavy-water reactors, and co-owns Westinghouse, a reactor-technology maker. The AI buildout reaches Cameco indirectly: data centers raise demand for steady, low-carbon power, which lifts the value of the existing nuclear fleet and the case for new reactors. Cameco supplies the fuel and reactor technology that fleet needs, though management never names AI, data centers or hyperscalers on its calls.

Market Cap—
Revenue (TTM)$2.5B
Revenue Growth−2.0%
EBITDA Margin (TTM)23.4%
Net Cash$73M
Earnings Beats5 of 7
P/E (TTM)—
EV/EBITDA (TTM)—

What We Like

  • Scarce high-grade resource base: the 40-F states tier-one production was 15% of world production in 2025 and claims controlling ownership of the world's largest high-grade mineral reserves.
  • Disciplined contracting: 230 million pounds committed under long-term contracts as of end-2025, with management saying it is holding back volumes for higher future prices.
  • Rising prices: management describes the long-term uranium price in the mid-90s, achieved before replacement-rate demand, with contract floors in the high 70s escalated and ceilings at 160 escalated.
  • Westinghouse economics disclosed: a 40-45% share of AP1000 project value, a roughly 20% average project EBITDA margin, and USD 45M-60M per reactor per year recurring after operation.
  • U.S. policy support: a USD 17.5B DOE conditional commitment for AP1000 long-lead items and a minimum USD 80B financing condition under the Commerce track.

What We’re Watching

  • Operational fragility: three unplanned interruptions in about two months in 2026 — a flood-driven halt at McArthur River and Key Lake, then a Cigar Lake suspension — though guidance held.
  • Westinghouse conversion: the 91-reactor pipeline carries no disclosed conversion probabilities, and neither U.S. government track has named projects yet.
  • Cost guidance was pushed up for 2026, attributed mainly to foreign exchange on purchases.
  • Concentration: five customers account for 56% of U3O8 commitments and 53% of UF6 conversion commitments.
Bottom Line

The operating thesis looks intact. The contracted book, rising realized prices and reaffirmed production guidance all held through the June 2026 quarter despite disruptions. The case is strengthening on the Westinghouse side, where disclosure expanded and two U.S. government financing tracks are live, but the revenue from those projects sits years out. The open question is whether the 91-reactor pipeline converts to signed orders, since management gives no probabilities.

Next upThe next test is the DOE's move to definitive agreements on the USD 17.5B AP1000 long-lead-item program, which would name specific U.S. utilities and show whether the pipeline becomes orders; no date is set. Westinghouse IPO terms are the other pending event, due once the SEC quiet period lifts.
Last Quarter — Q2 FY2026

Earnings Beat

Cameco reported Q2 FY2026 revenue of $573.5 million, down from $644.8 million a year earlier, with gross margin of 21.1% versus 29.3%. Management attributed the year-over-year decline largely to 2025's significant Westinghouse contribution from the Dukovany reactor project, and said the annual plan and production outlook were unchanged.

MetricQ2 FY2026Q1 FY2026Q2 FY2025YoY
Revenue$574M$608M$645M−11.1%
Gross margin21.1%35.7%29.3%-820bps
EBITDA$118M$166M$186M−36.4%
EPS$0.04$0.22$0.54−92.5%
We've never been at this kind of uranium price on the front end of a uranium contracting cycle. We've only ever found ourselves at these prices on the back end.— Grant Isaac, 2026-07-31

Management tone: Management's tone on the July 2026 call was confident on the uranium market and expansive on Westinghouse unit economics, with a step-change in disclosure granularity — a 91-reactor pipeline, project-value share and per-reactor recurring revenue. Management declined repeatedly to discuss the Westinghouse IPO, citing SEC rules, and conceded that cost guidance was raised. Analysts thanked management for the added Westinghouse disclosure.

Management Guidance

For FY2026, management guided uranium production of 19.5-21.5 million pounds (Cameco share), fuel services production of 13-14 million kgU, uranium deliveries of 29-32 million pounds at an average realized price of CAD 85-89/lb, and Westinghouse adjusted EBITDA of USD 370-430 million (Cameco share). The JV Inkai operation is expected to ramp to full capacity of 10.4 million pounds, with Cameco's share at 4.2 million pounds. Management said the annual plan and production outlook were unchanged despite operational disruptions, while cost guidance was pushed up, attributed mainly to FX on purchases.

Business Trajectory

Trajectory

Revenue is lumpy quarter to quarter, which management attributes to customer delivery schedules, product mix and fuel-cycle timing. TTM revenue was $2,497.0 million, with trailing revenue growth of about -2.0% year over year. Margins are compressing across gross, operating and EBITDA lines; the most recent quarter's EBITDA margin was 20.6%, down from 28.8% a year earlier. Management says realized prices continue to improve in uranium and fuel services even as reported revenue moves with deliveries.

Revenue & Margin Trajectory
RevenueGross margin$0$500$341M$254M$380M$609M$223M$296M$229M$674M$246M$387M$284M$431M$231M$290M$285M$368M$318M$433M$281M$387M$508M$364M$424M$637M$468M$438M$533M$823M$549M$645M$442M$874M$608M$574M16%21%crosses into profitQ1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2
RevenueGross margin$0$500$341M$254M$380M$609M$223M$296M$229M$674M$246M$387M$284M$431M$231M$290M$285M$368M$318M$433M$281M$387M$508M$364M$424M$637M$468M$438M$533M$823M$549M$645M$442M$874M$608M$574M16%21%crosses into profitQ1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2
Gross margin as reported.
Share Price — 12 Months
$50$100$052-wk high $134Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $79–$134.
Share Price — 12 Months
$50$100$052-wk high $134Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $79–$134.
The Numbers

The Model

The model projects FY+1 revenue of $2,613.0 million and EBITDA of $675 million, a 25.85% margin, then FY+2 revenue of $2,802.5 million and EBITDA of $799 million, a 28.5% margin. The near-term figure is anchored by the contracted uranium book and the fuel-services business, the disclosed drivers of near-term revenue, with the FY+2 step-up building off that base.

Revenue & EBITDA Projections
REVENUE$2.5B$2.6B$2.8BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$656M$675M$799M28.5%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
REVENUE$2.5B$2.6B$2.8BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$656M$675M$799M28.5%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
Solid bars are reported actuals; outlined bars are model projections — not company guidance.
MetricFY2025Next FY (E)Following FY (E)
Revenue$2.5B$2.6B$2.8B
YoY Growth—+4.1%+7.3%
EBITDA$656M$675M$799M
EBITDA Margin26.1%25.9%28.5%

Projections are the median of 4 independent model runs.

For FY2026, management guided uranium production of 19.5-21.5 million pounds (Cameco share), fuel services production of 13-14 million kgU, uranium deliveries of 29-32 million pounds at an average realized price of CAD 85-89/lb, and Westinghouse adjusted EBITDA of USD 370-430 million (Cameco share). The JV Inkai operation is expected to ramp to full capacity of 10.4 million pounds, with Cameco's share at 4.2 million pounds. Management said the annual plan and production outlook were unchanged despite operational disruptions, while cost guidance was pushed up, attributed mainly to FX on purchases.

What Could Go Right — and Wrong

What good looks like
  • Replacement-rate uranium contracting materializes, confirming the higher-price regime management says has not yet arrived.
  • The 91-reactor AP1000 pipeline converts from FEED-stage opportunity into signed orders and Westinghouse backlog.
  • The DOE and Commerce tracks move from framework to definitive agreements with named U.S. utilities.
  • Contract floors and ceilings keep rising, improving economics on the 230-million-pound book.
  • Cigar Lake and the other Tier 1 assets run without further interruption, keeping production within the 19.5-21.5 million pound plan.
What could go wrong
  • Uranium prices stall before replacement-rate demand arrives, and disciplined withholding leaves volume unsold into a weaker market.
  • AP1000 pipeline conversion is slower than the funnel implies, since no probabilities are disclosed.
  • DOE definitive agreements slip, or the Commerce track's minimum USD 80B financing condition is never met.
  • A further Tier 1 operational disruption breaks the 19.5-21.5 million pound production plan.
  • Competitors discount contract floors and ceilings, or utilities prefer spot-linked structures, and Cameco loses volume it declines to chase.
What’s Next

Looking Ahead

The next 12 months turn on whether the two U.S. government financing tracks become named projects. Management pointed to definitive agreements as the DOE's next step and to project announcements with the Department of Commerce, though neither has a fixed date. Westinghouse IPO terms will emerge once the SEC quiet period lifts. On the fuel side, the markers are replacement-rate uranium contracting and the restart of Cigar Lake.

Catalysts
  • A couple of weeks (from July 2026)Cigar Lake restart — McClean Lake mill repairs; tests the annual production plan.
  • Next step (no date)DOE definitive agreements — Would name U.S. utilities and DOE; converts USD 17.5B to orders.
  • No date givenCommerce project announcements — Pairs foreign-direct investors with Commerce; the USD 80B condition.
  • After SEC quiet periodWestinghouse IPO terms — Shares offered and price range are not yet determined.
  • OngoingAP1000 FEED-to-FID conversion — Movement in FEED-stage or first-project units would fill backlog.
  • 2027India contract deliveries begin — Uranium concentrate under a 22M lb contract running 2027-2035.
Numbers

Financials

Annual Summary

MetricFY2024FY2025TTMYoY
Revenue$2.3B$2.5B$2.5B+11.0%
Gross Margin25.9%30.8%27.9%+485bps
EBITDA$571M$656M$583M+14.9%
EBITDA Margin25.2%26.1%23.4%+90bps
Net Income$121M$429M$257M+255.4%
Free Cash Flow$491M$784M$390M—
Net Cash————

Key Ratios (Trailing)

Valuation
  • P/E TTM—
  • EV/EBITDA TTM—
  • EV/Revenue TTM—
  • Price/FCF TTM—
Profitability
  • Gross Margin (TTM)27.9%
  • EBITDA Margin (TTM)23.4%
  • Net Margin (TTM)10.3%
  • ROIC5.8%
  • FCF Conversion66.8%
  • SBC / Revenue0.2%
Reference

The Company

Cameco describes itself as an integrated nuclear fuel cycle company spanning exploration through fuel services. It produces uranium concentrate, refines and converts uranium, and manufactures fuel bundles for heavy-water reactors. Its output feeds commercial nuclear reactors that generate steady, low-carbon power. The 40-F calls uranium production the biggest value driver of the nuclear fuel cycle and of Cameco's business.

Cameco runs a small number of very high-grade assets. The 40-F describes McArthur River as the world's largest, high-grade uranium mine, Cigar Lake as the world's highest-grade uranium mine, and Key Lake as the world's largest uranium mill. In Ontario it holds the Blind River refinery and the Port Hope conversion facility, described in the filing as the only uranium conversion facility in Canada. A 49% interest in Westinghouse, co-owned with Brookfield, adds reactor technology and fuel fabrication in the U.S., UK and Sweden, and Cameco holds a development-stage stake in Global Laser Enrichment.

Business Segments

Uranium
Tier-one production was 15% of world production in 2025
Uranium concentrate (U3O8) from high-grade Saskatchewan mines and the Inkai JV in Kazakhstan.
Growth driver: Rising long-term uranium prices and contracting
Fuel Services
About 18% of world primary conversion capacity
Refining, conversion to UF6 and UO2, and CANDU fuel-bundle manufacturing.
Growth driver: Conversion contracts lengthening to 10-15 year tenors
Westinghouse (49%)
91-reactor AP1000 pipeline
Reactor-technology OEM and aftermarket services; AP1000, AP300 and eVinci designs.
Growth driver: AP1000 pipeline converting to FID and backlog

Competitive Landscape

Management describes incumbency as the advantage in a supply-constrained fuel cycle. Grant Isaac said suppliers promising new supply with unknown technology tend to be doubted by utilities, and that proven operators would be the primary beneficiary of higher prices. Competition shows up most on contract structure: some rivals discount contract floors and ceilings to win business, which Cameco says it will not do. Its contract model also differs from NexGen's fully spot-linked agreements.

  • Names Cameco as a competitor in nuclear services; also a merchant supplier into AP1000 long-lead procurement.
  • NexGen (NXE)
    Competitor; contracts with full spot-price exposure, unlike Cameco's collar structure.
  • Uranium Energy Corp (UEC)
    Dual-labeled customer and competitor; announced an end-to-end mining, refining and conversion ambition.
  • KEPCO / KHNP
    Resolved its technology and export dispute with Westinghouse in January 2025; their global deployments are not in Cameco's 91-reactor AP1000 pipeline.
  • Kazatomprom (KAP.L)
    Named a competitor; also supplies uranium concentrate from the Inkai JV.
Competitors drawn from the supply-chain wiring and the 40-F; BWXT is the only competitor that names Cameco directly.

Supply Chain

Cameco sits upstream and mid-cycle in the nuclear fuel chain, mining uranium and turning it into reactor fuel. ATI is the only neighbor that names Cameco directly; Brookfield and BWXT name Westinghouse.

Supplier
Zirconium and hafnium for fuel cladding, spacers and channel boxes
Supplier
Kazatomprom (KAP.L)
Uranium concentrate from the Inkai JV (40% stake)
Supplier
Steam turbine-generator packages for AP1000 new builds
Supplier
Linde (LIN)
Industrial gases for conversion and mining
→
High-grade assets and conversion incumbency
CCJ
Integrated fuel cycle: mining, refining, conversion and fuel fabrication
→
U.S. utilities (top five)
56% of U3O8 commitments
Five customers hold 56% of uranium commitments
UF6 conversion buyers (top five)
53% of commitments
Five customers hold 53% of conversion commitments
Uranium concentrate and UF6 conversion for 21 reactors
India Dept. of Atomic Energy
Uranium concentrate, 22M lbs over 2027-2035
Bruce Power
CANDU fuel bundles; a substantial portion of CFM's business

Analysis updated Sep 22, 2026, reviewing Q2 FY2026. Prices delayed. Built with The Buildout’s published methodology. Not investment advice. No positions held. © The Buildout 2026.

More on CCJ: Earnings recap