Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure

——Mkt cap — · 52-wk —–— · YTD — · delayed
Updated Sep 22, 2026Q2 FY2026 reviewed
Constellation Energy sells firm, clean electricity and capacity from the largest U.S. nuclear fleet to data centers and large customers.
920 MW deals signed
Long-term nuclear PPAs averaging 18.5 years, investment grade.
Guide raised
FY26 adjusted operating EPS lifted to $11.50–$12.50.
~30% contracted
Share of clean baseload output under long-term agreements.
70% uncontracted
Most clean baseload still sells into merchant markets.
The Buildout Takeaway
Constellation sells power, not AI hardware, so the buildout reaches it through long-dated contracts for plants that already exist. It turned a quarter of customer hesitation into signed deals and a raised guide; the open question is how much of its remaining uncontracted output follows, and at what price.
20 analysts·14 Buy6 Hold0 Sell
Median target$364  Range $296–$441 · 11 estimates

FY26 adjusted operating EPS of $11.50–$12.50, raised from $11.00–$12.00
Important: The Buildout is a data analytics platform. Content is generated by algorithms and AI agents using public filings, earnings transcripts, and market data. This is not personalized investment advice.
Our View

The Verdict

Constellation Energy produces and sells electricity and capacity. After the January 2026 Calpine merger it operates the largest private-sector power fleet in the world, built around the largest nuclear fleet in the United States, with gas, geothermal, hydro, wind and solar alongside it. It sells that output under long-term contracts to hyperscalers, data center developers, businesses, utilities and financial counterparties. For the AI buildout, that makes it a supplier of the input that is increasingly the binding constraint — already-built, already-interconnected firm power — rather than a technology vendor. Its growth depends less on inventing anything than on signing long-dated agreements for plants that already exist, which is why regulatory decisions about how large loads connect to the grid matter so much to its story.

Market Cap—
Revenue (TTM)$31.3B
Revenue Growth+26.0%
EBITDA Margin (TTM)23.1%
Net Debt$23.6B
Earnings Beats5 of 7
P/E (TTM)—
EV/EBITDA (TTM)—

What We Like

  • About 920 MW of long-term nuclear deals were signed in Q2 2026, at an 18.5-year average duration, with investment-grade counterparties.
  • FY26 adjusted operating EPS guidance was raised mid-year to $11.50–$12.50 from $11.00–$12.00; management said the midpoint is now what used to be the top end of the guide.
  • The 2030 nuclear PTC strike price rose to $50.88/MWh from $49.88, which management said adds about $0.30 per share to 2030 base earnings.
  • The DOJ overhang from the Calpine deal closed: Brazos Valley sold to LS Power for $860M, or about $1,420/kW, taking total required divestitures to roughly $5.9B in gross proceeds.
  • Management guided to $11.5B–$13B of free cash flow before growth over 2028–29, about 45% above the $8.4B expected in 2026–27.

What We’re Watching

  • About 70% of clean baseload output remains uncontracted, so the AI re-pricing runway is largely unbooked merchant exposure.
  • The marquee data-center transaction management previously telegraphed has still not been announced.
  • Illinois's ZEC program ends May 2027, and management says it has nothing separately under negotiation with the state.
  • The PJM capacity auction, co-location rules, an EPA decision on the 50-hour backup-generator limit and ERCOT's Batch Zero process all remain open.
Bottom Line

The thesis is strengthening on operational and regulatory evidence and still unproven on the demand confirmation that matters most. Guidance was raised, contracting converted after a quarter in which management said some customers paused, two Crane regulatory gates cleared, and the Calpine divestiture overhang closed. Against that, roughly 70% of clean baseload is uncontracted, the previously telegraphed data-center transaction has not been announced, and management says it is not in a position to commit to new build until it sees more detail from PJM. The open question is whether the Q2 contracting wave was the start of a durable trend or a catch-up quarter ahead of a slower grind.

Next upThe next scheduled tests are a PJM co-location response expected around November 2026 and a FERC order expected in Q1–Q2 2027; both will show whether the rules gating new large-load connections arrive on schedule.
Last Quarter — Q2 FY2026

Earnings Beat

In Q2 2026 Constellation reported revenue of $7,506M and EBITDA of $1,277M, a 17.0% EBITDA margin. GAAP earnings per share were $1.42; adjusted operating earnings per share were $2.55, $0.64 above the year-ago quarter. Contracting was the standout: about 920 MW of long-term nuclear deals signed since the prior call, averaging 18.5 years with investment-grade counterparties, taking contracted clean baseload to roughly 30%. Management raised FY26 adjusted operating EPS guidance to $11.50–$12.50 from $11.00–$12.00.

MetricQ2 FY2026Q1 FY2026Q2 FY2025YoY
Revenue$7.5B$11.1B$6.1B+23.0%
Gross margin100.0%42.9%18.0%+8200bps
EBITDA$1.3B$3.5B$1.8B−27.9%
EPS$1.45$4.53$2.67−45.8%
Long-term nuclear deals signed~920 MWn/an/a—
Clean baseload contracted long-term~30%n/an/a—
Our midpoint is now what used to be the top end of the guide, and we still have many opportunities to deliver more value this year.— Joseph Dominguez, 2026-08-06

Management tone: The tone moved from waiting for clarity to acting on early clarity. On the Q1 2026 call management affirmed guidance and described some customers choosing to pause and wait for regulatory clarity; on the Q2 2026 call it raised the guide, disclosed about 920 MW of signed contracts, and described the speed at which FERC is requiring PJM to move as unprecedented. Management declined to name counterparties or narrow the disclosed $20–$50/MWh price range, gave what it called a nonanswer on which site contracts next, and tempered new-nuclear expectations by saying nothing was imminently on the horizon. It also acknowledged co-location was moving slower than it wanted.

Management Guidance

Management raised FY26 adjusted operating EPS guidance to $11.50–$12.50 from $11.00–$12.00, attributing the increase to strong commercial execution and disciplined capital allocation. On the Q1 2026 call it guided to $8.4B of free cash flow before growth for 2026–27 and $11.5B–$13B for 2028–29, about a 45% increase, and did not restate those figures on the Q2 call. It also updated the 2029 capital-allocation sensitivity to a $0.20 per-share floor with more than $0.75 of upside, and revised the 2030 nuclear PTC strike price to $50.88/MWh from $49.88 — about $0.30 per share of 2030 base earnings — assuming a 2.8% adjustment for 2025 and 2% annual inflation thereafter, with more upside if inflation runs higher.

Business Trajectory

Trajectory

Revenue grew 64% year over year in Q1 2026, to $11,122M from $6,788M, as Calpine entered the consolidated numbers for a full quarter. Q2 2026 revenue was $7,506M, up 23% from $6,101M a year earlier, with EBITDA of $1,277M at a 17.0% margin. The code-computed signals flag revenue as accelerating and gross, operating and EBITDA margins as expanding, but mix explains much of it: Q1 2026 carried $3,581M of 'other revenue sources' — largely derivative and trading marks — against $682M a year earlier. Nuclear generation was steady at roughly 40 TWh in each of Q1 and Q2 2026, at capacity factors of 92.3% and 93%, and management attributes the improved results to Calpine accretion, higher PJM capacity prices and commercial margin capture in volatile markets. Free cash flow is the weak spot: negative $850M in Q1 2026 and negative $118M in Q2 2026.

Revenue & Margin Trajectory
RevenueGross margin$0$5.0B$10.0B$5.0B$4.4B$4.9B$4.2B$4.8B$4.7B$5.5B$4.6B$5.3B$5.1B$5.3B$4.2B$4.8B$4.6B$4.7B$3.9B$4.7B$4.3B$5.6B$4.2B$4.4B$5.5B$5.6B$5.5B$6.1B$7.3B$7.6B$5.4B$6.1B$5.8B$6.2B$5.5B$6.5B$5.4B$6.8B$6.1B$7.2B$5.5B$11.1B$7.5B25%100%crosses into profitQ3'16Q4Q1'17Q2Q3Q4Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2
RevenueGross margin$0$5.0B$10.0B$5.0B$4.4B$4.9B$4.2B$4.8B$4.7B$5.5B$4.6B$5.3B$5.1B$5.3B$4.2B$4.8B$4.6B$4.7B$3.9B$4.7B$4.3B$5.6B$4.2B$4.4B$5.5B$5.6B$5.5B$6.1B$7.3B$7.6B$5.4B$6.1B$5.8B$6.2B$5.5B$6.5B$5.4B$6.8B$6.1B$7.2B$5.5B$11.1B$7.5B25%100%crosses into profitQ3'16Q4Q1'17Q2Q3Q4Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2
Gross margin as reported.
Share Price — 12 Months
$200$400$052-wk high $390Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $242–$390.
Share Price — 12 Months
$200$400$052-wk high $390Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $242–$390.
The Numbers

The Model

The model projects FY+1 revenue of $34,500M with EBITDA of $8,004M, a 23.2% margin, then FY+2 revenue of $36,000M with EBITDA of $9,000M, a 25.0% margin. The near-term anchor is the full run-rate of the Calpine assets plus higher PJM capacity prices and the raised earnings guide; the FY+2 step implies EBITDA margin expanding by 1.8 percentage points, which would require more of the nuclear fleet to be contracted long-term and a mix shift toward the higher-margin nuclear-heavy regions. The five runs behind the locked numbers spread 14% on FY+1 revenue and 13% on FY+2.

Revenue & EBITDA Projections
REVENUE$25.5B$34.5B$36.0BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$5.3B$8.0B$9.0B25.0%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
REVENUE$25.5B$34.5B$36.0BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$5.3B$8.0B$9.0B25.0%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
Solid bars are reported actuals; outlined bars are model projections — not company guidance.
MetricFY2025Next FY (E)Following FY (E)
Revenue$25.5B$34.5B$36.0B
YoY Growth—+35.1%+4.3%
EBITDA$5.3B$8.0B$9.0B
EBITDA Margin20.7%23.2%25.0%

Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 16.4% above analyst consensus.

Management raised FY26 adjusted operating EPS guidance to $11.50–$12.50 from $11.00–$12.00, attributing the increase to strong commercial execution and disciplined capital allocation. On the Q1 2026 call it guided to $8.4B of free cash flow before growth for 2026–27 and $11.5B–$13B for 2028–29, about a 45% increase, and did not restate those figures on the Q2 call. It also updated the 2029 capital-allocation sensitivity to a $0.20 per-share floor with more than $0.75 of upside, and revised the 2030 nuclear PTC strike price to $50.88/MWh from $49.88 — about $0.30 per share of 2030 base earnings — assuming a 2.8% adjustment for 2025 and 2% annual inflation thereafter, with more upside if inflation runs higher.

What Could Go Right — and Wrong

What good looks like
  • The roughly 70% of clean baseload still uncontracted signs long-term inside the disclosed $20–$50/MWh range.
  • The marquee data-center transaction management previously telegraphed is announced.
  • PJM's capacity auction and co-location rules land on the stated timeline, letting more large loads connect to existing generation.
  • Crane returns to service in H2 2027 as targeted, and the Byron and Braidwood uprates begin adding to earnings from 2030.
  • Free cash flow before growth reaches the guided $11.5B–$13B for 2028–29.
What could go wrong
  • Regulatory clarity slips past the stated windows, re-creating the customer pause management described in Q1 2026.
  • The remaining uncontracted baseload signs at the low end of the price band, or does not sign at all.
  • ERCOT stays soft, with batteries arriving on the grid ahead of data-center load.
  • Planned nuclear refueling outages run long again and pull capacity factor down further.
  • The EPA does not carve out FERC-directed curtailments from the 50-hour annual limit on data-center backup generators.
What’s Next

Looking Ahead

The next twelve months turn on two tracks: whether the contracting wave that started in Q2 2026 continues, and whether the rules that gate large-load connections arrive when management says they will. Management has dated overall PJM clarity to year-end, the capacity auction to this fall with results by year-end, and its co-location response to around November 2026, with a FERC order expected in Q1–Q2 2027. The company says it will not commit to new build until it sees more detail from PJM, the Illinois ZEC program ends in May 2027 with no confirmed replacement, and the CyrusOne Freestone substation timeline it gave in Q1 was not updated in Q2.

Catalysts
  • Fall 2026PJM capacity auction — Procurement auction targeted at 6.8 GW, with results by year-end.
  • ~November 2026PJM co-location response — PJM's response on connecting large loads to existing generation.
  • Q1–Q2 2027FERC co-location order — Order expected on the rules for co-located load.
  • May 2027Illinois ZEC program ends — State program expires; no replacement mechanism confirmed.
  • H2 2027Crane restart — Three Mile Island Unit 1 targeted to return to service.
Numbers

Financials

Annual Summary

MetricFY2024FY2025TTMYoY
Revenue$23.6B$25.5B$31.3B+8.3%
Gross Margin25.3%85.5%94.9%+6,012bps
EBITDA$7.1B$5.3B$7.2B-25.1%
EBITDA Margin29.9%20.7%23.1%923bps
Net Income$3.7B$2.3B$3.5B-38.1%
Free Cash Flow−$5.0B$1.3B$309M—
Net Cash————

Key Ratios (Trailing)

Valuation
  • P/E TTM—
  • EV/EBITDA TTM—
  • EV/Revenue TTM—
  • Price/FCF TTM—
Profitability
  • Gross Margin (TTM)94.9%
  • EBITDA Margin (TTM)23.1%
  • Net Margin (TTM)11.1%
  • ROIC6.5%
  • FCF Conversion4.3%
  • SBC / Revenue0.0%
Reference

The Company

Constellation sells electricity and capacity rather than equipment or software. Its defining asset is its nuclear fleet, and around that it has wrapped a competitive retail supply platform and, with Calpine, a gas, geothermal, solar, battery and development engine. The 10-K self-describes the company as the largest private-sector power producer in the world, the nation's largest producer of clean and reliable energy with 55 GW of capacity, and the largest nuclear energy company in the U.S. It serves roughly 2.5 million customer accounts, including three-fourths of the Fortune 100 in the 10-K — a figure management updated to over 80% on the Q1 2026 call — and delivers about 275 million megawatt hours of electricity and 800 Bcf of natural gas a year across 40 states. Its customer products include CORe+, an hourly carbon-free energy product that matches carbon-free generation to a customer's load every hour, and Constellation Navigator.

The January 2026 Calpine merger changed the company's shape, adding roughly 23 GW and a development platform in new natural gas, solar and battery storage, plus capability in natural gas data center transactions. Constellation now reports four regional segments — Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, ERCOT and Other Power Regions — with Calpine still reported separately in the Q1 2026 10-Q. Several plants are only partly owned: Quad Cities at 75%, Peach Bottom at 50%, Salem at 42.59%, Nine Mile Point 2 at 82% and South Texas Project at 44%. The fleet's value rests on license life; management says the vast majority of its generation is secured through 2050 and beyond.

Business Segments

Mid-Atlantic
$1,847M Q1 2026 segment revenue
The eastern half of PJM — New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Delaware, DC and parts of Pennsylvania and North Carolina.
Growth driver: Higher PJM energy and capacity prices
Midwest
$1,732M Q1 2026 segment revenue
The western half of PJM and the U.S. footprint of MISO, excluding MISO's Southern Region.
Growth driver: Illinois nuclear fleet and contracting
ERCOT
$370M Q1 2026 segment revenue
The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, where Constellation is siting data centers next to its own generation.
Growth driver: Powered Land data center co-location

Competitive Landscape

The competitive set for large-load power is mostly other nuclear and gas generators. Supply-chain wiring names Talen, Vistra, NextEra, NRG, AES, PPL, NET Power, Hallador and LNG, with Hut 8 labeled a verified competitor, and PSEG appearing as both a competitor and a co-owner of the Salem units. Constellation's filings describe it as the largest nuclear energy company in the U.S., and management says the fleet's licenses extend through 2050 and beyond, so the material does not read the fleet itself as easily replaced. The competitive risk it identifies is that other suppliers sign the same hyperscalers first, or that co-location rules settle on a structure Constellation is less able to serve.

  • Talen
    Named in supply-chain wiring as competing on nuclear-backed AI data center power deals; not discussed by Constellation.
  • Vistra
    Named in the wiring as competing on nuclear and gas generation, battery storage and AI hyperscaler PPAs; not discussed by Constellation.
  • NextEra
    Named in the wiring for nuclear PPAs for data centers and an NVIDIA program; not discussed by Constellation.
  • NRG
    Named in the wiring as supplying power generation for data centers, including nuclear PPAs; not discussed by Constellation.
  • Hut 8
    Labeled a verified competitor in the supply-chain intelligence; not discussed by Constellation.
All competitor names come from the supply-chain wiring and are inferred, except Hut 8, which the supply-chain intelligence labels a verified competitor; none is discussed by Constellation itself.

Supply Chain

Constellation sits between fuel, equipment and construction suppliers and the utilities, businesses and data centers that buy its power. No neighboring company named Constellation on its own earnings call, so most supply-chain links are read-throughs rather than disclosed relationships.

Supplier
Uranium concentrate and UF6 conversion for 21 reactors including the Three Mile Island restart (inferred)
Supplier
Centrus
Enrichment SWU for the nuclear fleet (inferred)
Supplier
Fluor
EPC contractor for the Crane restart and nuclear projects (inferred)
Supplier
GE Vernova
Gas turbine O&M and new units, nuclear services and transformers (inferred)
→
Firm, carbon-free, already-connected generation
CEG
A 55 GW fleet across six fuel types, with the U.S.'s largest nuclear fleet at its center.
→
20-year nuclear PPA supporting the Crane restart (835 MW per wiring)
Meta
PPA for the output of the Clinton nuclear plant (1,121 MW per wiring)
Walmart
Long-term agreement for Dresden nuclear power (176 MW per wiring)
CyrusOne
380 MW
Powered Land co-location at the Freestone Energy Center, plus a Phase 2 exclusive for another 380 MW

Analysis updated Sep 22, 2026, reviewing Q2 FY2026. Prices delayed. Built with The Buildout’s published methodology. Not investment advice. No positions held. © The Buildout 2026.

More on CEG: Earnings recap