Ideal Power Inc. (IPWR) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
Ideal Power is a single-business, fabless power semiconductor company in Austin, Texas. It is developing one device: B-TRAN, a bidirectional transistor rated at 1200 volts that conducts and blocks current in both directions in a single switch, where silicon carbide MOSFETs and JFETs need at least two devices back-to-back. Its two launched products — a discrete B-TRAN die and the SymCool power module — are designed for solid-state circuit protection and electric vehicle contactors. The AI link runs through one architecture: the migration of data center power distribution from 400-volt AC to 800-volt DC, a shift NVIDIA has been driving through its GPU platform roadmap. That architecture requires solid-state circuit breakers for ultrafast fault handling, and B-TRAN is designed to be the switch inside them.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0M |
| Net Cash | $41M |
| Earnings Beats | 3 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- A long-term supply agreement with a high-volume, automotive-qualified wafer foundry in Asia — explicitly not China — that has built more than 1 billion power semiconductors; functional first silicon was achieved roughly a quarter after discussions began.
- Existing foundry relationships carry capacity for 2-plus years, and the new agreement is tied to management's 40%-plus gross margin target at scale.
- $41.3 million of cash at June 30, 2026, after a $27.7 million net registered direct offering led by the company's largest institutional shareholders; management said it gives partners confidence the company has adequate capital for several years.
- 105 issued patents, with the double-sided wafer process flow held as a trade secret rather than patented — management says a competitor studying the patents would still lack the know-how to fabricate the device.
- Two named commercial relationships: a late-2024 SSCB design win with one of the largest circuit protection equipment manufacturers in Asia, and a 2022 product development agreement with Stellantis for a custom B-TRAN power module.
What We’re Watching
- Q4 2026 is the load-bearing window: lead Asia customer prototype orders, hyperscaler prototype delivery, the Stellantis project milestone, and industrial JEDEC qualification completion all land in the same quarter.
- Both customer-controlled commitments moved in the same quarter: Stellantis deliverable timing was 'impacted,' shifting the next milestone from mid-2026 to Q4 2026, and automotive qualification went from 'this summer' to 'align with customer timelines.'
- Funnel conversion: the more than $400 million sales opportunity funnel is a management-defined opportunity metric, not backlog, and management calls converting it 'our top priority.'
- Industry timing: the 800V DC data center rollout those products serve is expected to start in the second half of 2027, with adoption into 2028 — well after the 2026 prototype milestones.
The case strengthened structurally and stayed unproven commercially. In one quarter the company signed a long-term foundry agreement, lifted its stated funnel above $400 million, and took cash to $41.3 million, while reported revenue rounded to zero and both customer-controlled commitments moved. The pattern across the last two calls is a company that keeps the items it controls and reframes the ones it does not. The open question is whether the Q4 2026 prototypes convert into orders and eventually production revenue, on a timeline where the industry's 800V DC rollout does not begin until the second half of 2027.
Earnings
Ideal Power reported effectively no revenue in the quarter ended June 30, 2026; the figure rounds to $0.0 million, consistent with management's description of 'modest revenue.' Gross margin was 30.9% on that minimal revenue, against -172.7% in the year-ago quarter. EBITDA was -$3.5 million and the net loss $3.4 million. Cash burn was $2.5 million, at the low end of the $2.5 million to $2.7 million guidance, and cash and equivalents stood at $41.3 million at June 30 after the May raise.
| Metric | Q2 FY2026 | Q1 FY2026 | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0M | $0M | $0M | — |
| Gross margin | 30.9% | — | -172.7% | +20360bps |
| EBITDA | −$4M | −$4M | −$3M | +16.7% |
| EPS | $-0.20 | $-0.32 | $-0.33 | −39.0% |
| Cash burn | $2.5M | $2.3M | $2.5M | flat |
| Sales opportunity funnel | >$400M | >$300M | n/a | — |
While growing funnel is encouraging, converting it into design wins, production orders and revenue remains our top priority.— David Somo, CEO, 2026-08-13
Management tone: The tone shifted on qualification posture and balance sheet. In May, management said it was 'making progress towards completing automotive reliability testing this summer'; in August it re-sequenced to industrial-first and said automotive testing 'will be planned to align with customer time lines.' On capital, May's call sat on $16.4 million of cash; August's sat on $41.3 million, with management describing capital as adequate for several years. Management was also direct that the strategy does not change because of the larger balance sheet, and it declined to put a date on the hyperscaler evaluation, saying the timing was 'difficult to call.'
Management Guidance
Full-year 2026 cash burn is guided to approximately $10 million to $10.5 million. Quarter-to-quarter variability in operating expenses is tied partly to the timing of semiconductor fabrication runs. No revenue guidance was given; the Q1 2026 filing said only that the company expects to recognize modest revenue from product sales and development agreements in the remainder of 2026.
Trajectory
Revenue has been effectively zero for several quarters: $0 in Q1 2026 and a figure rounding to $0.0 million in Q2 2026, against FY2025 commercial revenue of $37,728. Losses are steady rather than improving — EBITDA of -$3.5 million in Q2 2026 versus -$3.0 million a year earlier, and a net loss of $3.4 million versus $3.0 million. Gross margin was 30.9% in Q2 2026 against -172.7% in Q2 2025, on negligible revenue. What actually changed is the balance sheet and the forward pipeline: cash went from $16.4 million at March 31 to $41.3 million at June 30 after the $27.7 million net raise, and the stated sales opportunity funnel rose from about $300 million in May to over $400 million in August.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $0.2 million with EBITDA of -$14 million (-6700% margin), and FY+2 revenue of $2.0 million with EBITDA still -$14 million (-725% margin). Across the five independent runs the FY+2 revenue spread is 300%, ranging from $2 million to $8 million, so the projection is wide. The near term is anchored on sampling and development-kit orders and NRE fees, which is what management says near-term customer revenue consists of. FY+2 depends on whether the Q4 2026 prototypes convert into orders and whether the 800V DC data center rollout — which management expects to start in the second half of 2027, with adoption into 2028 — carries volume.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0M | $0M | $2M |
| YoY Growth | — | — | +900.0% |
| EBITDA | −$10M | −$14M | −$14M |
| EBITDA Margin | — | -6700.0% | -725.0% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs.
Full-year 2026 cash burn is guided to approximately $10 million to $10.5 million. Quarter-to-quarter variability in operating expenses is tied partly to the timing of semiconductor fabrication runs. No revenue guidance was given; the Q1 2026 filing said only that the company expects to recognize modest revenue from product sales and development agreements in the remainder of 2026.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- The lead Asia customer places initial low-volume orders in Q4 2026, converting the stated funnel into contracted revenue for the first time.
- The intelligent SSCB prototype is delivered for the hyperscaler's NVIDIA Rubin Ultra evaluation, the expected purchase order arrives, and follow-on evaluations with additional hyperscalers materialize.
- Industrial JEDEC qualification completes in Q4 2026, unlocking the AI data center, energy storage, and grid opportunities management calls its nearest-term revenue.
- Stellantis completes the remaining purchase-order deliverables on the Q4 2026 milestone and moves toward a production decision on the EV contactor program.
- Volume orders ship from the new foundry and gross margin approaches the 40%-plus target tied to that foundry's cost structure.
- The funnel does not convert: no production order arrives, and reported revenue stays near zero.
- Stellantis deliverables slip again past Q4 2026, or automotive qualification remains undated.
- The 800V DC data center rollout slips materially past the second half of 2027, pushing volume revenue into 2028 and beyond.
- A competitor or a system integrator's in-house solution takes the socket — silicon carbide or JFET switches, or integrator programs such as Eaton's acquired Resilient Power, ABB's Advantics, or Vertiv's own solid-state development.
- Cash burn overshoots the FY2026 guide of $10.3 million to $10.5 million, or the company draws on its shelf registration.
Looking Ahead
The next twelve months run through a dense Q4 2026 cluster: initial low-volume orders for the lead Asia customer's prototype builds, delivery of the intelligent SSCB prototype for the hyperscaler's NVIDIA Rubin Ultra evaluation, the next Stellantis project milestone, and completion of industrial JEDEC qualification — with the low-current SSCB prototype having shipped to the Asia customer in August and the intelligent SSCB concept introduced at the Open Compute Project Global Summit in October 2026. Every forward commitment in the record is a development, prototype, qualification, or supply-chain milestone rather than a contracted order, and no backlog value has been disclosed. The industry rollout those milestones feed is expected to start in the second half of 2027.
- August 2026Asia prototype shipment — Low-current SSCB prototype shipped to the lead Asia customer for testing.
- October 2026OCP Summit introduction — Intelligent SSCB prototype concept introduced with the industry partner.
- Q4 2026Asia initial orders — Initial low-volume orders to support the customer's prototype builds.
- Q4 2026Hyperscaler prototype delivery — Intelligent SSCB prototype due for NVIDIA Rubin Ultra evaluation.
- Q4 2026Industrial qualification — JEDEC qualification completes, gating near-term AI and grid revenue.
- Q4 2026Stellantis milestone — Next project milestone supported by completed PO deliverables.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0M | $0M | $0M | -100.0% |
| Gross Margin | -345.5% | -112.1% | — | +23,339bps |
| EBITDA | −$11M | −$10M | −$12M | +2.8% |
| EBITDA Margin | -10700.0% | — | — | — |
| Net Income | −$10M | −$10M | −$12M | +0.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | −$9M | −$9M | −$9M | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- ROIC-602.4%
The Company
Ideal Power makes one thing: the B-TRAN bidirectional switch. Unlike silicon carbide MOSFETs and JFETs, which need at least two devices back-to-back to conduct and block in both directions, a single B-TRAN does both, is rated at 1200 volts, and handles faults in microseconds. The company has launched two commercial products built on it — a discrete packaged B-TRAN die and the multi-die SymCool power module — both designed to meet the very low conduction loss needs of solid-state circuit protection and electric vehicle contactor markets. It has extended to the system level with solid-state circuit breakers, an intelligent SSCB prototype, SSCB reference design kits aimed at incumbent electromechanical breaker makers, and earliest-stage solid-state transformers. The AI relevance is the 800-volt DC power distribution that next-generation AI racks require, where solid-state breakers provide the ultrafast fault handling.
Ideal Power is fabless. Wafer fabrication and packaging are outsourced, and the counterparties are deliberately unnamed: management treats the double-sided wafer process flow as a trade secret and says that even a competitor studying its patents would lack the know-how to fabricate the device. Foundries and packaging houses are chosen exclusively in countries the company says have a history of respecting intellectual property rights, and customers can learn the foundry's identity under NDA. Its only disclosed facility is a leased 5,775 square-foot office and laboratory in Austin, Texas, and it reports a single operating segment. Operations have been funded primarily through the sale of common stock and pre-funded warrants. It holds 105 issued patents and has added a Europe sales director, applications engineering support in Asia, and a quality hire supporting automotive qualification.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
The 10-K lists the leading players in the global power semiconductor market as competitors: Infineon Technologies, Texas Instruments, onsemi, Fuji Electric, STMicroelectronics, Mitsubishi Electric, Rohm Semiconductor, and Renesas Electronics. Management's differentiation is technical rather than commercial: B-TRAN conducts and blocks in both directions in a single 1200-volt device, while JFETs and silicon carbide MOSFETs need at least two devices in back-to-back configuration. No design win against silicon carbide appears in the record. The second source of competitive pressure comes from the system integrators buying or building the capability themselves — Eaton acquired Resilient Power for medium-voltage solid-state transformers, ABB acquired Advantics for DC and silicon-carbide technology, and Vertiv describes its own solid-state work as project development.
- Infineon Technologies AGNamed in the 10-K's leading-players list; also referenced in Q&A as the maker of a CoolSiC JFET comparison.
- Texas InstrumentsNamed in filings; not discussed.
- onsemiNamed in filings; not discussed.
- Fuji ElectricNamed in filings; not discussed.
- STMicroelectronicsNamed in filings; not discussed.
Supply Chain
Ideal Power sits upstream of circuit-protection OEMs and contactor makers: it designs the switch, outsources wafers and packaging, and sells into breakers and contactors that eventually reach data centers. No neighbor transcript in the source material mentions Ideal Power by name.
Related companies
See all Silicon Design companies → · How this layer works: Chapter 1, The Chip →
More on IPWR: Earnings recap