LandBridge Company LLC (LB) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure
The Verdict
LandBridge owns the surface. It holds fee title to more than 325,000 acres across the Delaware Basin, the west Texas and southeast New Mexico core of the Permian, and charges anyone who wants to use that land. Oil and gas producers pay surface-use fees and buy brackish water and caliche to drill wells. Water midstream operators pay royalties to move and dispose of produced water. Increasingly, data center developers and power generators pay for options on large contiguous tracts that sit near transmission, natural gas and water — and that last group is the AI connection. It is real but early: the announced digital work sits in non-binding options and letters of intent, and recurring data center revenue on the disclosed record is nil.
| Market Cap | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $225M |
| Revenue Growth | +44.0% |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | 70.7% |
| Net Debt | $496M |
| Earnings Beats | 0 of 7 |
| P/E (TTM) | — |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | — |
What We Like
- Fee-based and capital-light: Q2 2026 capex was $1.1 million against $66.8 million of revenue, and company-reported adjusted EBITDA margin was 89%.
- Produced water volumes rose about 15% sequentially in Q2 2026, and WaterBridge's Speedway Phase 1 is online with volumes guided to ramp through 2028.
- The digital funnel went from one announced option to seven counterparties representing more than 10 gigawatts in a single quarter, and management says the disclosed count is a conservative subset of a larger queue.
- Water is the differentiator: about 13.4 million acre-feet of brackish groundwater, plus treated produced water for cooling and pore space for disposal.
- Net leverage of 2.5x sits inside the 2x–2.5x target band, total liquidity is $269.8 million, the revolver is upsized to $375 million with a $475 million accordion, and no debt matures until 2030.
What We’re Watching
- Nothing in the digital pipeline is binding: all seven agreements are LOIs, options or late-stage negotiations, no economics have been disclosed for any of them, and management guides first revenue to the end of 2027 at the earliest.
- Customer concentration is structural: the top three customers were about 47% of FY2025 revenue, WaterBridge alone was 25%, and related-party revenue was 30.7% of Q1 2026.
- Free cash flow margin fell from 80% in Q1 2026 to 60% in Q2 2026 while dollar free cash flow stayed roughly flat; the call did not explain the step-down.
- Power delivery and the ERCOT audit are external timing gates; management calls well-structured, behind-the-meter projects insulated, but no primary document in the source names the directive.
The operating thesis is intact and the base is compounding, but what changed this period was disclosure and structure rather than reported results. Revenue set a record, leverage improved inside target, and the digital funnel moved from a single named option to a counted seven — while none of those agreements is binding and none carries disclosed economics. The business direction only changes when letters of intent and options turn into leases, which management places on a roughly one-year horizon. The open question is the economics: no lease rate, term, acreage per project or revenue per megawatt exists in the disclosed record for any of the seven, so the optionality cannot be sized.
Earnings
LandBridge reported record Q2 2026 revenue of $66.8 million, up 41% year over year and 31% sequentially, at a 96.3% gross margin. Net income was $31.0 million, up 68% year over year, and company-reported adjusted EBITDA was $59.8 million at an 89% margin. The operational standout was produced water volumes, up roughly 15% sequentially, which management attributed to WaterBridge assets coming online earlier than expected. Surface use royalties and revenues rose 41% sequentially, resource sales and royalties rose 1%, and oil and gas royalties rose 20% on higher oil prices while amounting to about 5% of the quarter.
| Metric | Q2 FY2026 | Q1 FY2026 | Q2 FY2025 | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $67M | $51M | $48M | +40.6% |
| Gross margin | 96.3% | 88.1% | 91.4% | +490bps |
| EBITDA | $48M | $34M | $31M | +56.5% |
| EPS | $0.44 | $0.64 | $0.10 | +363.1% |
| Digital counterparties under LOI, option or late talks | 7 | 1 | n/a | — |
| Net leverage ratio | 2.5x | 2.7x | n/a | — |
There was a bit of an acceleration in second quarter. I think, kudos to the WaterBridge team for being able to get some of those assets online earlier than expected.— Scott McNeely, CFO, 2026-08-06
Management tone: Management was more confident and more specific on the Q2 2026 call than on Q1 2026. The funnel was quantified for the first time (seven counterparties, more than 10 gigawatts), the board approved the corporate conversion, and the revolver was upsized. McNeely volunteered that Q2 produced water volumes benefited from a pull-forward — WaterBridge assets came online earlier than expected — and cautioned that the back-half ramp would not be as pronounced as the Q1-to-Q2 move. Asked about the Texas directive halting new data center approvals pending an ERCOT audit, he reframed it as "more of an audit and disclosure exercise than the outright moratorium" and argued behind-the-meter, co-located, water-secured projects would keep moving; no primary document in the source names the directive. Alpha Digital lease economics were declined, with a commitment to disclose on option exercise. Samsung BESS, NRG and ONEOK, all named on prior calls, went unmentioned.
Management Guidance
Management guides FY2026 adjusted EBITDA of $210 million to $230 million — the only metric it guides. The range was raised by $5 million at both ends on the Q1 2026 call and reaffirmed on the Q2 2026 call. The stated basis for the raise was increased visibility in the commercial pipeline for the remainder of the year and a more supportive macroeconomic environment; the transcript's list of tailwinds did not include data center revenue. No revenue, margin, capex, cash-use or tax-rate guidance is provided. Speedway Phase 2 is explicitly not in the current guidance, and management said it will speak to that contribution when it forms the 2027 outlook.
Trajectory
Revenue ran $56.8 million in Q4 FY2025, $51.0 million in Q1 FY2026 — about a 10% sequential decline the source reader called expected — then a record $66.8 million in Q2 FY2026, up 31% sequentially and 41% year over year. Reported figures label the sequential trajectory decelerating through the March quarter, with gross and operating margins compressing and EBITDA margin broadly stable. The mix explains the swing: surface use royalties and revenues rose 41% sequentially on produced water volumes, resource sales and royalties rose 1%, and oil and gas royalties rose 20% on higher oil prices while staying a small slice of revenue. Free cash flow margin stepped down to 60% from 80% even though the dollars were roughly flat.
The Model
The model projects FY+1 revenue of $256 million and EBITDA of $182 million, a 71.2% margin, rising to FY+2 revenue of $305 million and EBITDA of $224 million, a 73.5% margin. The near term rests on the fee-based water and surface base: produced water volumes, a Speedway Phase 1 ramp guided through 2028, and resource sales that grew only 1% sequentially in the latest quarter. The FY+2 step-up would depend on the digital pipeline converting; management places first meaningful data center revenue at the end of 2027 at the earliest, and Speedway Phase 2, targeted at back-half 2027 operational needs, is not yet in guidance.
| Metric | FY2025 | Next FY (E) | Following FY (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199M | $256M | $305M |
| YoY Growth | — | +28.6% | +19.1% |
| EBITDA | $136M | $182M | $224M |
| EBITDA Margin | 68.2% | 71.2% | 73.5% |
Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 28.4% above analyst consensus.
Management guides FY2026 adjusted EBITDA of $210 million to $230 million — the only metric it guides. The range was raised by $5 million at both ends on the Q1 2026 call and reaffirmed on the Q2 2026 call. The stated basis for the raise was increased visibility in the commercial pipeline for the remainder of the year and a more supportive macroeconomic environment; the transcript's list of tailwinds did not include data center revenue. No revenue, margin, capex, cash-use or tax-rate guidance is provided. Speedway Phase 2 is explicitly not in the current guidance, and management said it will speak to that contribution when it forms the 2027 outlook.
What Could Go Right — and Wrong
- Several of the seven LOIs and options convert to firm leases with revenue beginning by the end of 2027, the timeline management calls very realistic.
- Produced water volumes keep ramping as Speedway Phase 1 builds through 2028 and Phase 2 comes online for back-half 2027 operational needs.
- The blended produced water royalty rate moves above the $0.15 per barrel prevailing rate as New Mexico volumes grow along the state line.
- Potentially larger M&A closes in the back half of 2026, adding acreage and revenue on top of the more than 325,000 surface acres already held.
- The conversion to a Texas corporation completes and index eligibility broadens the eligible investor base, as management intends.
- The seven counterparties stay non-binding past the guided end-2027 horizon, and the digital option never reaches the income statement.
- No economics are disclosed on any of the seven, so more than 10 gigawatts cannot be converted into a revenue estimate from the disclosed record.
- A slowdown or change in economics at WaterBridge, which is 25% of revenue and operates the infrastructure behind the largest segment, hits the royalty base directly.
- The free cash flow margin step-down from 80% to 60% proves to be a durable change in cash conversion rather than working-capital timing.
- Competition in the digital niche sharpens: TPL is running a 25 GW pipeline and a Reeves County project with Chevron, and Chevron and Diamondback are pursuing the same counterparties.
Looking Ahead
Over the next twelve months the tests are mostly about conversion. Management expects multiple of the seven digital LOIs and options to become firm leases with revenue kicking on by the end of 2027, says there is room to add counterparties over the next few months, and has flagged potentially larger M&A in the back half of 2026. Speedway Phase 2 is targeted at back-half 2027 operational needs and is not in guidance, and the corporate conversion to a Texas corporation carries no stated date. Running underneath all of it is whether produced water volumes keep ramping after a second quarter that pulled some of the back-half growth forward.
- Back half of 2026Larger M&A — Management flagged a few opportunities potentially larger than recent bolt-ons.
- Over the next few monthsMore digital counterparties — Management says there is room to add to the seven-counterparty pipeline.
- FY2026Guidance outcome — Reported adjusted EBITDA against the $210M–$230M range.
- Back half of 2027Speedway Phase 2 online — Targeted for 2027 operational needs; not yet in guidance.
- End of 2027Digital leases convert — Management calls multiple LOIs and options flipping to leases realistic.
- Late 2027Alpha Digital first power — Option exercise would trigger lease-terms disclosure.
Financials
Annual Summary
| Metric | FY2024 | FY2025 | TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $110M | $199M | $225M | +81.0% |
| Gross Margin | 89.5% | 92.2% | 92.4% | +270bps |
| EBITDA | −$8M | $136M | $159M | +1863.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | -7.0% | 68.2% | 70.7% | +7,521bps |
| Net Income | −$42M | $30M | $46M | +171.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | $67M | $141M | $170M | — |
| Net Cash | — | — | — | — |
Key Ratios (Trailing)
- P/E TTM—
- EV/EBITDA TTM—
- EV/Revenue TTM—
- Price/FCF TTM—
- Gross Margin (TTM)92.4%
- EBITDA Margin (TTM)70.7%
- Net Margin (TTM)20.6%
- ROIC13.4%
- FCF Conversion106.7%
- SBC / Revenue15.0%
The Company
LandBridge is a fee-surface landowner in the Delaware Basin, the west Texas and southeast New Mexico core of the Permian. It does not drill wells and does not build the infrastructure on its land; customers build and operate, and LandBridge collects fees, royalties and easements. The 10-K describes a company that "owns or manages more than 315,000 surface acres," a figure that has walked up across disclosures to more than 320,000 acres on the Q1 2026 call and over 325,000 on the Q2 2026 call. It reports three revenue lines: Surface Use Royalties and Revenues, Resource Sales and Royalties, and Oil and Gas Royalties. The surface line covers payments for oil and gas development, produced water transportation and handling, pipeline and electrical infrastructure, digital infrastructure, a commercial fuel distribution facility and solid waste facilities; the resource line sells brackish water and caliche used to drill wells and collects sand and water royalties; the oil and gas line is a share of production from about 4,400 gross mineral acres, roughly 96% of which underlie the surface acreage.
The model is capital-light by design. Q2 2026 capex was $1.1 million against $66.8 million of revenue, and the 10-K says customers bear most capital costs while LandBridge's revenue comes from "fee-based royalties, leases, and service-related revenues that require minimal capital investment." The 10-K names three surface positions: the Stateline Position at roughly 169,000 acres across Loving, Reeves and Winkler Counties, Texas, and Lea County, New Mexico; the Northern Position at about 61,000 fee-owned plus 33,000 leased acres across Eddy and Lea in New Mexico and Andrews in Texas; and the Southern Position at about 87,000 acres across Reeves, Ward and Pecos Counties, Texas, adjacent to the I-10 and I-20 corridors. The company is currently a Delaware LLC; on 2026-06-15 it formed a special committee to evaluate a corporate conversion, and by the Q2 2026 call the board had unanimously approved converting to a Texas corporation, with management citing index eligibility among the S&P, Russell and CRSP benchmarks.
Business Segments
Competitive Landscape
The 10-K states the risk plainly: LandBridge "compete[s] with other landowners to provide an attractive development site for the limited number of potential customers," and it is geographically concentrated in the Permian. Management argues the position is hard to replicate — fee title rather than leases, pore space that "isn't burdened with the kind of pore pressure concerns that you're seeing in so many areas," 13.4 million acre-feet of brackish groundwater, and large contiguous blocks with community support. The source's own read is that this is the argument, not yet a proven moat: the nearest comparable, TPL, is running a 25-gigawatt pipeline and a desalination project in the same basin, and Chevron and Diamondback are contesting the same counterparties.
- Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)Named as competitor, customer and partner: reciprocal crossing rights plus produced water royalty and revenue sharing across an area of mutual interest, and 14% of FY2025 accounts receivable. The neighbor read-through credits TPL with 25 GW of advanced power and compute conversations, Project Kilby with Chevron in Reeves County, the Orla Phase 2b desalination project, and more than 10,000 acres acquired for about $100 million.
- Chevron (CVX)Flagged in the relationship map for Permian data center development with Microsoft exclusivity. Named in the lower-confidence Wiring file; not discussed in LandBridge's filings or calls.
- Diamondback Energy (FANG)Flagged in the relationship map for marketing Permian land and gas to attract data centers. Named in the lower-confidence Wiring file; not discussed in LandBridge's filings or calls.
- Viper Energy (VNOM)Flagged in the relationship map for mineral and royalty interests. Named in the lower-confidence Wiring file; not discussed in LandBridge's filings or calls.
Supply Chain
LandBridge sits at the land layer of the Permian chain: it owns the surface that producers, water midstream operators and now data center developers pay to use, and it builds nothing itself. No supplied neighbor transcript names LandBridge directly; the closest handoff is Devon Energy mentioning WaterBridge.
More on LB: Earnings recap