TC Energy Corporation (TRP) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure

——Mkt cap — · 52-wk —–— · YTD — · delayed
Updated Sep 22, 2026Q2 FY2026 reviewed
TC Energy transports natural gas and owns power assets that data-center-driven electricity demand depends on.
EBITDA +12% YoY
Q2 2026 comparable EBITDA higher in every business unit.
Backlog >$20B
Origination funnel up from a verbal ~$15B earlier in the year.
AI EBITDA $100M
2026 target, about halfway there with two quarters behind us.
NGTL terms TBD
Canadian investment framework undetermined; progress hoped by end-2026.
The Buildout Takeaway
The demand case rests on geography. Most of the incremental gas-demand outlook sits in the U.S. Heartland, Alberta and Mexico, where TC already owns the pipe, and most future supply comes from basins it connects. The open question is Canadian returns: management says higher returns there will have to be earned.
19 analysts·9 Buy10 Hold0 Sell
Coverage is thin — only 1 price estimate, so no target is shown

2026 comparable EBITDA: upper end of $11.6B–$11.8B · 2028 comparable EBITDA: $12.6B–$13.1B · leverage: 4.75x or better · 2026 AI-related incremental EBITDA target: $100M
Important: The Buildout is a data analytics platform. Content is generated by algorithms and AI agents using public filings, earnings transcripts, and market data. This is not personalized investment advice.
Our View

The Verdict

TC Energy moves natural gas. It owns the pipelines that gather gas in Appalachia and Western Canada, carry it into the U.S. Midwest and Northeast, and ship it to Mexico, LNG terminals and power plants. It also owns power and storage assets, including nuclear generation in Ontario. The AI build-out matters to it indirectly: data centers need large amounts of firm electricity, much of the incremental North American generation is expected to be gas-fired, and that pulls demand for pipeline capacity, laterals and storage. Management says AI also runs inside the company, optimizing its own pipeline network. TC Energy does not sell chips or servers; it sells the transportation and power that sit upstream of them.

Market Cap—
Revenue (TTM)$11.5B
Revenue Growth+24.4%
EBITDA Margin (TTM)64.1%
Net Debt$43.5B
Earnings Beats5 of 7
P/E (TTM)—
EV/EBITDA (TTM)—

What We Like

  • Management's demand outlook calls for ~51 Bcf/d of incremental North American gas demand by 2035, a 40% increase over 2025 levels and an 11 Bcf/d increase from the original outlook; power generation is ~16 Bcf/d, more than half of it.
  • Roughly 70% of that demand sits in the U.S. Heartland, Alberta and Mexico, and more than 60% of supply by 2035 is projected from TC-connected basins. Management frames the growth as brownfield, in-corridor expansions off assets it already owns.
  • The project funnel is disclosed in three buckets: ~$3B sanctioned year-to-date 2026 at a ~12% weighted average unlevered after-tax IRR, ~$7B pending approval (up $1B quarter over quarter), and >$20B in origination, aligned to a 5–7x build-multiple range.
  • Contracted revenue is long-dated: a base of 20-year take-or-pay contracts, plus 25-year transportation service agreements with each of the five LNG Canada joint venture participants on Coastal GasLink.
  • Bruce Power's eight units total about 6,580 MW. Unit 3 returned in June 2026 more than 7 months ahead of the ISO schedule and roughly 15% below Unit 6's cost, and the final two refurbishment units complete in 2031–2032, unlocking $2B–$3B a year of growth capital.

What We’re Watching

  • The NGTL return framework is still to be determined. Management hopes for progress by end of 2026, and about 1/3 of the >$20B origination backlog is penciled for Canadian markets.
  • Funding the 2029–2031 window: management describes a 2- or 3-year gap before Bruce cash flow inflects and says 2028 is the year it puts things in motion. Levers named include capital rotation, hybrids, private credit and common equity.
  • Crossroads: precedent agreements with multiple anchor customers are subject to Board approval, and FID is expected in Q4 2026. Size and detailed economics were not disclosed.
  • Equipment coverage is asserted only for projects sanctioned to date, not for the pending-approval or origination buckets.
Bottom Line

The thesis looks intact and, on the operational evidence, strengthening. Every dated promise in the evidence window was delivered or progressing; the two live gaps are the NGTL investment framework and the funding rank-order. Execution on Bruce Power is corroborated by four other numbers on the same call, and the 2028 comparable EBITDA range of $12.6B–$13.1B was held through two disclosures even as the funnel grew, which reads as a timing question rather than a constraint. The open question is whether the NGTL return framework lands at returns that clear the company's hurdle by end-2026, and how the 2029–2031 funding window gets closed.

Next upThe nearest signpost is the update management pointed to for its November 2026 timeframe, where it promised AI proof points out to 2030. Crossroads FID follows in Q4 2026, with NGTL framework progress targeted by end of 2026.
Last Quarter — Q2 FY2026

Earnings Beat

For the quarter ended June 30, 2026, TC Energy reported revenue of $2.81B and a gross margin of 50.4%, with EBITDA of $1.78B, both above the year-ago quarter on the same basis. Management said comparable EBITDA rose 12% year over year with every business unit higher, and that daily average natural gas pipeline flows were up 3% across the three-country network. Bruce Power availability was 99% in the quarter following Unit 3's return in June.

MetricQ2 FY2026Q1 FY2026Q2 FY2025YoY
Revenue$2.8B$3.0B$2.8B+2.2%
Gross margin50.4%56.7%49.2%+120bps
EBITDA$1.8B$2.1B$1.7B+5.4%
EPS$0.69$0.64$0.61+12.9%
Growth projects sanctioned (YTD 2026)~$3Bn/an/aAt a ~12% weighted average unlevered after-tax IRR
AI-related incremental EBITDA target (2026)$100Mn/an/aAbout halfway there with two quarters behind us
reflect growing demand from natural gas-fired power generation and data center development— Francois Poirier, President and CEO, 2026-07-30

Management tone: Management's commentary on the Q2 2026 call was confident and more expansionary than the prior reporting cycle. Language on investment pace moved from "we could go there if we choose to" to "visibility to increasing" to a stated expectation for 2029, 2030 and beyond. The 2026 comparable EBITDA guide was tilted to the upper end of the range, a new three-bucket backlog was disclosed, and management said it "felt compelled" to show the origination backlog figure. The call was also candid on open items: the NGTL return framework is "still to be determined," and management said the AI pilot gains cannot be linearly extrapolated.

Management Guidance

Management is targeting the upper end of its 2026 comparable EBITDA range of $11.6B–$11.8B and reaffirmed 2028 comparable EBITDA of $12.6B–$13.1B, which it describes as an approximate 6% annualized midpoint growth from 2025 results. It expects to place approximately $3.5B of assets into service by the end of 2026 after about $2B in the first half. On sanctions, management says there is "a very good chance" 2026 sanctioned capital lands in the $6B–$8B range against a typical $3B–$4B a year. Leverage is committed at 4.75x or better, called a firm commitment. The 2026 AI-related incremental EBITDA target is $100M, with the company about halfway there.

Business Trajectory

Trajectory

Revenue was $2.81B in the June 2026 quarter, down from $3.05B in the March quarter, and the code-computed signal labels the revenue trajectory decelerating. EBITDA as reported was $1.78B in the June quarter versus $1.69B a year earlier. On a trailing-twelve-month basis, revenue was $11.49B and EBITDA $7.36B, a 64.1% margin. Margins are expanding: gross +190bps, operating +200bps and EBITDA +150bps in the latest read. Management attributed its tilt to the upper end of the 2026 comparable EBITDA range to operational performance year-to-date rather than to new capital, which is still earning in. The pattern across the two periods in evidence is hold-and-tilt, with nothing cut.

Revenue & Margin Trajectory
RevenueGross margin$0$2.0B$2.7B$2.4B$2.5B$2.9B$2.6B$2.6B$2.4B$2.5B$2.4B$2.3B$2.4B$2.6B$2.7B$2.6B$2.6B$2.8B$2.8B$2.8B$2.7B$3.0B$2.9B$2.9B$2.9B$3.2B$2.6B$2.4B$3.0B$946M$2.5B$2.8B$2.7B$3.0B$3.0B$2.8B41%50%Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2
RevenueGross margin$0$2.0B$2.7B$2.4B$2.5B$2.9B$2.6B$2.6B$2.4B$2.5B$2.4B$2.3B$2.4B$2.6B$2.7B$2.6B$2.6B$2.8B$2.8B$2.8B$2.7B$3.0B$2.9B$2.9B$2.9B$3.2B$2.6B$2.4B$3.0B$946M$2.5B$2.8B$2.7B$3.0B$3.0B$2.8B41%50%Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2
Gross margin as reported.
Share Price — 12 Months
$20$40$60$052-wk high $71Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $50–$71.
Share Price — 12 Months
$20$40$60$052-wk high $71Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $50–$71.
The Numbers

The Model

The model projects FY+1 revenue of $11,814M with EBITDA of $7,655M, a 64.8% margin, and FY+2 revenue of $12,463M with EBITDA of $8,163M, a 65.5% margin. The near term is anchored on assets already placed into service and on the 2026 comparable EBITDA range management is tilting toward its upper end, with about $3.5B of assets due into service by year-end 2026. The FY+2 step-up depends on projects sanctioned now earning in later, on rate-case outcomes, and on the continued operating leverage management describes across its pipeline and storage footprint.

Revenue & EBITDA Projections
REVENUE$10.9B$11.8B$12.5BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$6.8B$7.7B$8.2B65.5%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
REVENUE$10.9B$11.8B$12.5BFY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$6.8B$7.7B$8.2B65.5%FY25FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
Solid bars are reported actuals; outlined bars are model projections — not company guidance.
MetricFY2025Next FY (E)Following FY (E)
Revenue$10.9B$11.8B$12.5B
YoY Growth—+8.4%+5.5%
EBITDA$6.8B$7.7B$8.2B
EBITDA Margin62.3%64.8%65.5%

Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs.

Management is targeting the upper end of its 2026 comparable EBITDA range of $11.6B–$11.8B and reaffirmed 2028 comparable EBITDA of $12.6B–$13.1B, which it describes as an approximate 6% annualized midpoint growth from 2025 results. It expects to place approximately $3.5B of assets into service by the end of 2026 after about $2B in the first half. On sanctions, management says there is "a very good chance" 2026 sanctioned capital lands in the $6B–$8B range against a typical $3B–$4B a year. Leverage is committed at 4.75x or better, called a firm commitment. The 2026 AI-related incremental EBITDA target is $100M, with the company about halfway there.

What Could Go Right — and Wrong

What good looks like
  • 2026 sanctioned capital landing at the top of the $6B–$8B range, roughly 2x the company's stated normal cadence of $3B–$4B a year.
  • The NGTL investment framework resolved by end-2026 with returns that clear the hurdle, unlocking the Canadian third of the >$20B origination backlog.
  • Crossroads sanctioned in Q4 2026 at the larger end of the hinted scope, where current capacity is ~250 MMcf/d and a potential expansion is ~1.5 Bcf/d.
  • The November 2026 update showing the $100M AI-related EBITDA target is a floor rather than a ceiling, with detail out to 2030.
  • Bruce Power's final two refurbishment units completing in 2031–2032 on schedule, unlocking $2B–$3B a year of growth capital.
What could go wrong
  • Crossroads slipping past Q4 2026 or being sanctioned materially smaller than the roughly $1B pending-approval step-up implies, weakening the 2026 sanction ambition.
  • The NGTL framework landing at returns that do not clear hurdle, leaving about 1/3 of the origination backlog without economics and rotating capital to the U.S.
  • The 2029–2031 funding window closed with a cost of capital above current market levels; common equity is explicitly on the list of instruments named.
  • A data-center development pause in a state or province inside TC's footprint, testing the demand outlook directly.
  • Equipment or contractor tightening reaching the ~$7B pending and >$20B origination buckets, which are not covered by the assurance that pipeline equipment is secured for everything sanctioned to date.
What’s Next

Looking Ahead

The next 12 months are largely set by management's own calendar. An update in early November 2026 is the stated venue for AI detail out to 2030, and plausibly for NGTL framework progress and a Crossroads status check. Crossroads FID is expected in Q4 2026, the 2026 sanction tally lands against a $6B–$8B stretch range, the year-end in-service target remains on the calendar, and management hopes to report progress on the NGTL framework by end of 2026. Beyond that, Bruce C technology selection is expected likely next year, funding actions are pointed at 2028, and the final two Bruce refurbishment units complete in 2031–2032.

Catalysts
  • November 2026AI detail to 2030 — Next update, promised with AI proof points out to 2030.
  • Q4 2026Crossroads FID — Board approval and sanction of the Midwest expansion project.
  • End of 2026NGTL framework progress — Return construct for the Canadian third of the origination backlog.
  • FY2026Sanction and in-service tally — $6B–$8B sanction ambition; ~$3.5B of assets into service.
  • 2027Bruce C tech selection — Selection expected before any FID; no FID date given.
  • 2028Funding plan actions — Management points to 2028 for putting funding instruments in motion.
Numbers

Financials

Annual Summary

MetricFY2024FY2025TTMYoY
Revenue$9.0B$10.9B$11.5B+21.2%
Gross Margin50.2%49.9%51.5%35bps
EBITDA$5.9B$6.8B$7.4B+15.9%
EBITDA Margin65.1%62.3%64.1%282bps
Net Income$3.4B$2.5B$2.6B-26.1%
Free Cash Flow$1.1B$1.5B$2.6B—
Net Cash————

Key Ratios (Trailing)

Valuation
  • P/E TTM—
  • EV/EBITDA TTM—
  • EV/Revenue TTM—
  • Price/FCF TTM—
Profitability
  • Gross Margin (TTM)51.5%
  • EBITDA Margin (TTM)64.1%
  • Net Margin (TTM)22.5%
  • ROIC6.6%
  • FCF Conversion35.3%
  • SBC / Revenue0.0%
Reference

The Company

TC Energy describes two core businesses — Natural Gas Pipelines and Power and Energy Solutions — reported through four operating segments plus a Corporate segment. It gathers and moves natural gas, sells transportation and storage capacity, and owns power generation. Its lines feed gas-fired power plants, LNG export terminals and utilities, which is the channel through which data-center electricity demand reaches it: management says the quarter's project announcements reflect growing demand from gas-fired power generation and data-center development.

It operates its systems under different regulators: the Canada Energy Regulator for interprovincial pipelines and provincial regulators within provinces, FERC for the U.S. interstate business, and long-term contracts in Mexico where CFE is the primary counterparty on all existing pipelines. The network spans 94,000 kilometers of pipe and 650 bays of storage across three countries. Bruce Power's eight nuclear units, about 6,580 MW, sit near Tiverton, Ontario. Management says that in less than 18 months since spinning off its Liquids business, it has replaced nearly all of that EBITDA with natural gas and power projects.

Business Segments

U.S. Natural Gas Pipelines
~$14B of origination capital, 10–11 Bcf of capacity
The U.S. interstate footprint across Columbia Gas, ANR, Columbia Gulf, GTN, Northern Border and others, concentrated in Appalachia and the Midwest.
Growth driver: Power generation, data center and coal-to-gas demand
Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines
About 1/3 of the origination backlog is penciled for Canadian markets
NGTL, the Canadian Mainline, Foothills and Coastal GasLink. The Canadian Mainline settlement added ~350 MMcf/d for ~$200M of capital.
Growth driver: Data-center participation in NGTL open seasons
Power and Energy Solutions
Bruce Power: eight units, ~6,580 MW
Nuclear generation at Bruce Power plus cogeneration, wind, solar, RNG and the Crossfield and Edson storage facilities linked to NGTL.
Growth driver: Final two MCR units complete 2031–2032

Competitive Landscape

Management describes TC Energy as the incumbent in the majority of the premium markets it serves, "often the largest provider," which it says allows it to develop cost-competitive expansions; Tina Faraca adds that "incumbency and integration really matter in this market." The one documented competitor quote in the evidence comes from Pembina, which states that the natural gas transportation industry from western Canada to eastern markets "has historically been serviced by companies affiliated with TC Energy." The rest of the competitive set is inferred from the relationship wiring, and those peers are spending into the same demand pool — the sector theme cites Enbridge's backlog at $39B and Williams at five behind-the-meter data center projects.

  • Pembina
    The one documented competitor quote: the western-Canada-to-eastern-markets route "has historically been serviced by companies affiliated with TC Energy."
  • Enbridge
    Inferred in the wiring file and annotated for "AI data center behind-the-meter gas, cross-border pipelines, LNG feed gas."
  • Williams
    Inferred in the wiring file and annotated for "US gas pipeline corridors, LNG feed gas, data center expansions."
  • Named in the relationship wiring as a competitor; not discussed in the source material.
Competitors taken from the 2026-07-08 supply-chain wiring file; only the Pembina quote is documented, the rest are inferred or verified annotations.

Supply Chain

TC Energy sells transportation capacity and power rather than equipment, so its supply side is thin: a small set of named equipment and construction suppliers, and a customer base running from state utilities and Mexico's CFE to LNG terminals and, increasingly, data-center developers.

Supplier
Gas turbine compressor drivers for pipeline compressor stations
Supplier
Construction of a 900 MW combined-cycle generating station
Supplier
Plug Power
Two 30-TPD hydrogen liquefaction systems
Supplier
CNX
Listed in the wiring with the product text "natural gas transportation via interstate pipeline," direction as given in the source
→
Incumbency and in-corridor expansion
TRP
Gas gathering, egress and storage across three countries.
→
CFE
primary counterparty on all Mexico pipelines
Long-term contracts, predominantly denominated in U.S. dollars
LNGC Participants
five JV participants
25-year transportation service agreements with renewal provisions on Coastal GasLink
Data-center developers
Record participation in the 2030–2032 intra-Alberta offering

Analysis updated Sep 22, 2026, reviewing Q2 FY2026. Prices delayed. Built with The Buildout’s published methodology. Not investment advice. No positions held. © The Buildout 2026.

More on TRP: Earnings recap