Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) | The Buildout — AI Infrastructure

——Mkt cap — · 52-wk —–— · YTD — · delayed
Updated Sep 22, 2026Q4 FY2026 reviewed
Supermicro integrates GPUs and CPUs into rack-scale AI servers and bundles cooling, networking and software around them.
Orders $60B+
Q4 FY26 orders, ~70% described as pure AI.
FY26 revenue +78%
FY26 revenue $39.1B, up from about $22B in FY25.
9 $1B customers
Up from 4 in FY25.
Margin 10.9%
FY26 non-GAAP gross margin fell from 11.2% in FY25.
The Buildout Takeaway
The order book is the strongest evidence in the story — over $60B of new Q4 orders against $39.1B of FY26 revenue, with a step-change FY27 guide. The open question is conversion: customer site power and cooling readiness has pushed revenue later for three straight quarters, and the Q4 margin spike resets lower in Q1.
25 analysts·9 Buy14 Hold2 Sell
Coverage is thin — only 5 price estimates, so no target is shown

Q1 FY27 revenue $14.5B–$15.5B · gross margin 10.4%–10.8% · FY27 revenue $65B–$72B
Important: The Buildout is a data analytics platform. Content is generated by algorithms and AI agents using public filings, earnings transcripts, and market data. This is not personalized investment advice.
Our View

The Verdict

Supermicro builds the machines that go inside AI data centers. It buys GPUs and CPUs from chipmakers, integrates them into dense rack-scale systems, and sells the racks to cloud service providers, large data centers and enterprises. Under its DCBBS banner it is bundling more of the surrounding data center: liquid cooling, networking, data-center management software and lifecycle services. The company positions this integration, and the speed at which a customer can get a rack running, as its value. It sits one layer below the silicon — it does not design the processors its systems depend on — and it competes with server vendors and contract manufacturers that assemble similar machines.

Market Cap—
Revenue (TTM)$39.1B
Revenue Growth+77.8%
EBITDA Margin (TTM)7.3%
Net Cash$841M
Earnings Beats3 of 7
P/E (TTM)—
EV/EBITDA (TTM)—

What We Like

  • New Q4 FY26 orders were larger than the entire $39.1B FY26 revenue line; about 70% described as pure AI.
  • FY27 revenue guided to $65B–$72B, a step-change from FY26.
  • The customer base widened to 9 customers above $1B in FY26 from 4 in FY25, and the largest customer fell from 63% of revenue in Q2 FY26 to 27% in Q3 FY26.
  • FY26 non-GAAP operating margin expanded to 8.1% from 7.1%; the Q4 non-GAAP operating margin was 14.3%.
  • Balance sheet: $7.5B cash and $6.7B total debt — a net cash position of about $841M at quarter-end.

What We’re Watching

  • Q1 FY27 gross margin: management guided 10.4%–10.8% after Q4's 17.5%, with roughly 75% of the Q4 gain from mix including deferred contracts and about 25% from lower tariffs and lower inventory reserves.
  • Customer site readiness: the same power, cooling and networking delays have now pushed revenue later in three consecutive quarters.
  • Working capital: FY26 operating cash flow was −$6.8B, the cash conversion cycle reached 149 days and DPO fell to 29 days; the CFO expects it to normalize on current backlog terms.
  • Legal and regulatory: the independent investigation was completed on 2026-08-20, but officer-and-director investigations were announced on 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-11, and the 10-Q describes a per-consignee, per-country export volume cap.
Bottom Line

The demand case is strengthening on disclosed numbers — a record order book and a step-change FY27 guide. The margin and cash cases are not settled. Q4's gross margin was lifted by deferred contracts and items management calls nonrecurring, and the working-capital drain required a $5.6B raise. The open question is whether the order book converts on schedule and whether the DCBBS and enterprise mix makes the margin durable — or whether Q4 was a one-quarter timing artifact on a still-low-margin hardware model.

Next upThe Q1 FY27 report is the first test: it must show revenue inside the guided range and hold gross margin at the guided 10.4%–10.8% after the Q4 spike. Management also said it expects to provide a Board investigation update shortly.
Last Quarter — Q4 FY2026

Earnings

Q4 FY26 revenue was $11.1B, up 93% year over year and 9% quarter over quarter, landing near the low end of the $11.0B–$12.5B guide because customer site readiness delayed shipments. Gross margin was 17.5%, far above the guided 8.2%–8.4%, on favorable mix. The quarter's standout was the order book: management disclosed record new orders.

MetricQ4 FY2026Q3 FY2026Q4 FY2025YoY
Revenue$11.1B$10.2B$5.8B+93.2%
Gross margin17.5%9.9%9.5%+800bps
EBITDA$1.5B$649M$247M+515.8%
EPS$1.69$0.72$0.31+440.7%
New ordersover $60Bn/an/a—
AI solutions (% of revenue)~60%>80%n/a—
In our preannouncement, we disclosed over $60 billion in new orders, driving our order book and backlog to new record levels as we enter fiscal year 2027.— Charles Liang, Founder, President and CEO, 2026-08-11

Management tone: Management was expansive on demand and strategy, and guarded on the two topics the skeptics press on. The Q4 call opened with the record order disclosure and a step-change FY27 guide, and spent little of the prepared remarks on the revenue miss. On the Q1 FY27 gross-margin reset, the disclosure was direct. Asked for a full-year FY27 margin framework, management pointed to the Q1 range rather than giving one. Asked for a Board investigation update, it said it expects to provide one shortly.

Management Guidance

For Q1 FY27, management guided net sales of $14.5B–$15.5B, gross margin of 10.4%–10.8% ("Based on the expected customer and product mix"), GAAP diluted EPS of $0.89–$0.98 and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $1.01–$1.10. It guided GAAP opex to about $453M including roughly $127M of stock-based compensation, other income/expense to a net expense of about $45M, tax to 20.1% GAAP and 20.5% non-GAAP, and CapEx to $50M–$60M. For the full year FY27, it guided net sales of $65B–$72B. It also said it has no plans to use its ATM program, that AI-related revenue should be greater than 80% going forward, and that it expects the cash conversion cycle to normalize based on terms in the current backlog.

Business Trajectory

Trajectory

FY26 revenue was $39.1B, up 78% from about $22B in FY25, and the revenue direction is accelerating. Q4 revenue of $11.1B rose 93% year over year but only 9% sequentially, because customer readiness delays pushed shipments out. Gross margin has been volatile: 6.3% in Q2 FY26, 9.9% in Q3 and 17.5% in Q4, with Q1 FY27 guided back to 10.4%–10.8%. For the full year, non-GAAP gross margin was 10.9% versus 11.2% in FY25 — the annual margin compressed even as the Q4 exit rate spiked. Operating and EBITDA margins are expanding. The weak spot is cash: FY26 operating cash flow was −$6.8B and the cash conversion cycle reached 149 days.

Revenue & Margin Trajectory
RevenueGross margin$0$5.0B$10.0B$529M$663M$615M$673M$717M$827M$835M$982M$971M$932M$744M$854M$800M$871M$772M$896M$762M$830M$896M$1.1B$1.0B$1.2B$1.4B$1.6B$1.9B$1.8B$1.3B$2.2B$2.1B$5.4B$5.9B$5.4B$5.9B$5.7B$4.6B$5.8B$5.0B$12.7B$10.2B$11.1B16%18%Q1'17Q2Q3Q4Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2Q3Q4
RevenueGross margin$0$5.0B$10.0B$529M$663M$615M$673M$717M$827M$835M$982M$971M$932M$744M$854M$800M$871M$772M$896M$762M$830M$896M$1.1B$1.0B$1.2B$1.4B$1.6B$1.9B$1.8B$1.3B$2.2B$2.1B$5.4B$5.9B$5.4B$5.9B$5.7B$4.6B$5.8B$5.0B$12.7B$10.2B$11.1B16%18%Q1'17Q2Q3Q4Q1'18Q2Q3Q4Q1'19Q2Q3Q4Q1'20Q2Q3Q4Q1'21Q2Q3Q4Q1'22Q2Q3Q4Q1'23Q2Q3Q4Q1'24Q2Q3Q4Q1'25Q2Q3Q4Q1'26Q2Q3Q4
Gross margin as reported.
Share Price — 12 Months
$20$40$60$052-wk high $59Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $21–$59.
Share Price — 12 Months
$20$40$60$052-wk high $59Sep '25DecMar '26JunSep '26
52-week range $21–$59.
The Numbers

The Model

The model projects FY+1 revenue of $70,000M and EBITDA of $5,810M (8.3% margin), and FY+2 revenue of $88,000M and EBITDA of $7,920M (9.0% margin). Near term, the FY+1 revenue figure sits inside management's guided fiscal-2027 range of $65B–$72B, so it is anchored to the order book and the guided ramp. The FY+2 step-up assumes that order book converts and that the mix shift toward enterprise, DCBBS and software lifts the EBITDA margin toward 9.0%. Across the five model runs, FY+2 revenue spans $86,000M to $95,000M.

Revenue & EBITDA Projections
REVENUE$39.1B$70.0B$88.0BFY26FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$2.9B$5.8B$7.9B9.0%FY26FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
REVENUE$39.1B$70.0B$88.0BFY26FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)EBITDA & MARGIN$2.9B$5.8B$7.9B9.0%FY26FY+1 (E)FY+2 (E)
Solid bars are reported actuals; outlined bars are model projections — not company guidance.
MetricFY2026Next FY (E)Following FY (E)
Revenue$39.1B$70.0B$88.0B
YoY Growth—+79.2%+25.7%
EBITDA$2.9B$5.8B$7.9B
EBITDA Margin7.3%8.3%9.0%

Projections are the median of 5 independent model runs. The model’s revenue sits 46.3% above analyst consensus.

For Q1 FY27, management guided net sales of $14.5B–$15.5B, gross margin of 10.4%–10.8% ("Based on the expected customer and product mix"), GAAP diluted EPS of $0.89–$0.98 and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $1.01–$1.10. It guided GAAP opex to about $453M including roughly $127M of stock-based compensation, other income/expense to a net expense of about $45M, tax to 20.1% GAAP and 20.5% non-GAAP, and CapEx to $50M–$60M. For the full year FY27, it guided net sales of $65B–$72B. It also said it has no plans to use its ATM program, that AI-related revenue should be greater than 80% going forward, and that it expects the cash conversion cycle to normalize based on terms in the current backlog.

What Could Go Right — and Wrong

What good looks like
  • The record order book converts on schedule and FY27 revenue lands at or above the $65B–$72B guide.
  • Q1 FY27 gross margin holds at or above the guided 10.4%–10.8%, and the DCBBS and enterprise mix lifts margin durably.
  • The cash conversion cycle normalizes on improved backlog terms, making the FY27 ramp self-funding.
  • DCBBS is quantified and moves toward management's stated 20% gross-profit contribution.
  • Customer diversification continues: more large customers and a lower largest-customer share.
What could go wrong
  • Customer site readiness slips a fourth consecutive quarter and the order book converts slower than guided.
  • Gross margin re-compresses toward the FY26 full-year 10.9% or below, showing Q4 was a timing artifact.
  • Working capital worsens — the cash conversion cycle rises above 149 days — and requires another raise.
  • A large customer shifts volume to a competitor as ODMs sell direct.
  • A legal or regulatory outcome names the company, or the export volume cap binds its largest customers.
What’s Next

Looking Ahead

The next twelve months turn on one question: whether the record order book converts. Management guides FY27 revenue to a step-change from FY26. The Q1 FY27 report tests both the revenue ramp and the margin reset. On the product side, Supermicro says it is shipping NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 systems, preparing what it calls first-to-market Vera Rubin systems, and building out a 32-acre Silicon Valley campus that brings its total US footprint to nearly 4 million square feet. DCBBS remains unquantified. The legal overhang is not closed: the independent investigation was completed on 2026-08-20, and officer-and-director investigations were announced in late August and September 2026.

Catalysts
  • Q1 FY27Q1 FY27 results — Tests the Q1 revenue guide and the margin reset.
  • Q1 FY27DCBBS software update — More features and service products promised online early next quarter.
  • FY27FY27 full-year results — Tests the FY27 revenue guide.
Numbers

Financials

Annual Summary

MetricFY2025FY2026TTMYoY
Revenue$22.0B$39.1B$39.1B+77.8%
Gross Margin11.0%10.8%10.8%25bps
EBITDA$1.3B$2.9B$2.9B+118.8%
EBITDA Margin6.0%7.3%7.3%+138bps
Net Income$1.0B$2.2B$2.2B+112.7%
Free Cash Flow$1.5B−$7.0B−$7.0B—
Net Cash————

Key Ratios (Trailing)

Valuation
  • P/E TTM—
  • EV/EBITDA TTM—
  • EV/Revenue TTM—
  • Price/FCF TTM—
Profitability
  • Gross Margin (TTM)10.8%
  • EBITDA Margin (TTM)7.3%
  • Net Margin (TTM)5.7%
  • ROIC16.0%
  • FCF Conversion-243.0%
  • SBC / Revenue0.3%
Reference

The Company

Supermicro builds the servers that go inside AI data centers. It buys GPUs from NVIDIA and AMD and CPUs from AMD and Intel, then integrates them into rack-scale systems — the GB300 NVL72, HGX B300 and similar high-density platforms — sold to cloud service providers, large data centers and enterprises. Under its DCBBS banner it is bundling more of the surrounding data center: direct liquid cooling, CDUs, chilled doors, water towers, high-speed networking, data-center management software and lifecycle services. Management describes the company as moving from a US-based server designer and manufacturer toward a total data center solution provider.

Supermicro designs and manufactures in the United States, Taiwan, Malaysia and the Netherlands, and it owns rather than leases nearly all of that manufacturing space. Its San Jose, California headquarters and production site is about 1,601,000 square feet and owned; it also owns roughly 954,000 square feet in Taoyuan, Taiwan and about 590,000 square feet in Malaysia on 30 acres, and leases about 350,000 square feet of office and manufacturing in Den Bosch, Netherlands. A new 32-acre Silicon Valley campus brings the total US footprint to nearly 4 million square feet. Two related-party suppliers, Ablecom and Compuware, manufactured about 94% of chassis and about 92% of power supplies purchased in the March 2026 quarter.

Business Segments

OEM appliance and large data center
69% of FY26 revenue
Rack-scale GPU AI systems for Neoclouds, CSPs and sovereign AI. Q4 revenue $5.5B, down 26% sequentially.
Growth driver: Large GPU rack deployments (NVIDIA, AMD).
Enterprise and channel
31% of FY26 revenue
CPU server, storage and IoT sold to enterprises and through channel. Q4 revenue $5.6B, up 172% year over year.
Growth driver: Enterprise infrastructure upgrades; higher margin mix.
DCBBS
Target: 20% of gross profit
Bundled data center stack spanning servers, storage, liquid cooling, networking, software and services.
Growth driver: Total-solution attach; management cites >20% segment margin.

Competitive Landscape

The 10-K names global technology vendors Cisco, Dell, Hewlett-Packard Enterprise and Lenovo, and ODMs Foxconn, Quanta Computer and Wiwynn, as competitors. The competitive question the evidence raises is whether large data center and cloud customers buy through integrators like Supermicro or go directly to ODMs. Asked about that on the Q4 call, management focused on power and data-center readiness and liquid cooling and described the company as "both ODM and OEM, we will continue to grow in both ways" rather than directly rebutting the concern. The criticality assessment notes that multiple alternative server assemblers exist and switching would take months.

  • Dell
    Named in the FY2025 10-K as a global technology vendor competitor; not discussed individually.
  • Hewlett-Packard Enterprise
    Named in the FY2025 10-K as a global technology vendor competitor; not discussed individually.
  • Lenovo
    Named in the FY2025 10-K as a competitor; separately named as the OEM for a new GB300 cluster on HIVE's latest call.
  • Cisco
    Named in the FY2025 10-K as a global technology vendor competitor; not discussed individually.
  • Foxconn, Quanta Computer, Wiwynn
    Named in the FY2025 10-K as ODM competitors; not discussed individually.
All names come from the FY2025 10-K competitor list, plus HIVE's disclosure naming Lenovo; no competitor is discussed individually in the source beyond the list.

Supply Chain

Supermicro sits between chipmakers and data center operators. It buys GPUs, CPUs, memory, switching and cooling parts, then integrates them into racks. AMD named Supermicro by name as a fifth-generation EPYC platform partner; most other neighbors did not name it.

Supplier
NVIDIA
GB300/B200/Vera Rubin GPUs, NVSwitch 5, ConnectX-8 SuperNICs
Supplier
AMD
MI350/MI355X GPUs, EPYC CPUs, Helios
Supplier
Intel
Xeon 6+ CPUs and server management silicon
Supplier
Tomahawk 6 Ethernet switches, PCIe switches, NICs
Supplier
Ablecom / Compuware
Related-party contract manufacturing of chassis and power supplies
→
Time-to-online DCBBS total solutions
SMCI
Designs and manufactures total data center building blocks in the USA, Taiwan, Malaysia and the Netherlands.
→
India Yotta AI project: 20,736 B300 + 5,120 B200 cards and networking.
Nutanix (NTNX)
NX series hardware platforms; sole source.
Rubrik (RBRK)
Rubrik-branded appliances; sole source.
Large data center / CSP customer
28% of FY26 revenue
Unnamed in filings.

Analysis updated Sep 22, 2026, reviewing Q4 FY2026. Prices delayed. Built with The Buildout’s published methodology. Not investment advice. No positions held. © The Buildout 2026.

More on SMCI: Earnings recap